Contractual Notice Requirement vs. Statutory Public Utility Termination
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe dispute centered on whether a contractual stipulation requiring mandatory prior written notification for contract termination, established in a concession agreement, was overridden by a subsequent legislative act permitting termination based on a finding of public utility without such prior notice. The court reasoned that the subsequent legislation, being a matter of public order, implicitly derogated from the contractual notice requirement because the legislative intent was to allow the immediate termination of the concession in the public interest, rendering adherence to the prior contractual formalities incompatible with the statutory objective of rapid public utility realization.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAContractual Notice Requirement vs. Statutory Public Utility Termination: The court reasoned that the subsequent legislation, being a matter of public order, implicitly derogated from the contractual notice requirement because the legislative intent was to allow the immediate termination of the concession in the public interest, rendering adherence to the prior contractual formalities incompatible with the statutory objective of rapid public utility realization.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IATexte complet
A/2549/2008
### [ATAS/1065/2008](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1962029) du 25.09.2008 ( CHOMAG ) , RETIRE
[](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2008/0010/ATAS_001065_2008_A_2549_2008.pdf)
* /