Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/1058/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/1058/2006 Généré par l'IA

Financial Benefit Conditioned on Opposing Party's Appeal Period

Numéro de cause ATAS/1058/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court considered whether a certain provision, which conditioned the availability of certain financial benefits upon the filing of an appeal by an opposing party within a specified timeframe, violated a fundamental right to judicial relief. The tribunal reasoned that since the challenged provision did not entirely extinguish the right to seek judicial review but merely attached a reasonable condition precedent based on the actions of another party—specifically, tying the benefit's commencement to the expiration of the period for the other side to appeal or the filing of the appeal itself—it did not unconstitutionally restrict access to the courts, as the underlying right to seek review remained intact regardless of the conditional benefit.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Financial Benefit Conditioned on Opposing Party's Appeal Period: The tribunal reasoned that since the challenged provision did not entirely extinguish the right to seek judicial review but merely attached a reasonable condition precedent based on the actions of another party—specifically, tying the benefit's commencement to the expiration of the period for the other side to appeal or the filing of the appeal itself—it did not unconstitutionally restrict access to the courts, as the underlying right to seek review remained intact regardless of the conditional benefit.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
contrôle juridictionnel droit de visite dispositions financières droit de demeurer effets des arrêts préjudiciels prestation temporaire

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision governs the allocation of court costs, as ordered in the final ruling.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



                 !

""#

 " $% &$$% # "$&# & %#

&'(   ) * +,(   



 !!!!!!!!!!"#$%"&'()    *





*

+   ,   "-* *$% ./##0"&1'(  2



       

   ,'35,  

#%66*#)7'((4"*#&87*'((49

:##79

:#*;*6*<"*$=  > !!!!!!!!!!6*#%$6*#'(?&&?'((4*#@;# #4A4(B@?B(?6*"<C6"##%##$**8((@? 6#*<#@"6**D#*%/%#A0#%$C'((4? ? !!!!!!!!!! A- //?  6* %;*  * #A%;* C# D *#%;@@*%**@"#$E$DA%;*6$*#6*# ? !!!!!!!!!!6%%'((0*#A%;*@*D@*6AC7*# 6%* #%$6*?  %D*" ? !!!!!!!!!! A// < %/  $** # 4A'(B @? B( #A  0 #%$C 6F  6 *#? .  ;$*"   A//<*6*G?

" &# - . %# " $% &$$% # "$&# & %#

) /00+   1

20+3+(( 4 /  5 %67

&?  * <  !!!!!!!!!! #  //$* < ;  $$ # 4A'(B@?B(#A0#%$C6F6*# H&),1(0,)" 6##**$6*##%$6*#'(;$C'((4?

'? :-#$**D#C?

5? *< +   ,   ## ;D6%.#"*#DA*6*#.%6*# ;$*$*%?

8? :-#$**D#C?

0?  * I 6* #  DA %;*  * #A%;* C# D *#%;@@*%**@"#$E$DA%;*6$*#6* # ? !!!!!!!!!! 6%%  '((0 * #A%;* @* D  @* 6 AC7*#6%*#%$6*?

4? *D6%#*/**?



3'4&53'((4  ,535,   )? 66*#:*?0( "@$6*#D:6;*@$ *6%*E*##%#5(7#.*@*66 $$#%#% C@%#%#"JFKLF@D4"4((8   "*I$6?#%6*E*6/%?$%$#*= M#DI*$*D#%*#%C**6# #%D%9CMI66D$*@*$6;#$# *#%9M6*/*#6%**?J$%$ ** 6  * %%$* %$%%   M CM * M ,#"  C@%#%#66*$*.D: #;#%;C?$%$#$*$- # 6;" D * 7*"  D  #% D% * :;66 # D%*%I6%#%*N*?&5'"&(4*&(BM?





    /@@.= %#*=       2O P CJ

6@$#6%*E***@%I6**<A@@@%#%# *%6CD6/@@





3'4&53'((4