Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/1054/2008 • CJ GE ATAS/1054/2008 Généré par l'IA

Judicial Review of Professional Disciplinary Action

Numéro de cause ATAS/1054/2008
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige struck_off
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The situation involved a challenge to the validity of a decision by a professional regulatory body regarding the professional conduct of a member, where the member contested the decision on procedural and substantive grounds, primarily focusing on the evidence presented and the impartiality of the decision-makers. The court reasoned that the professional body, in its disciplinary proceedings, had followed the requisite procedural safeguards and that the findings of fact, supported by the substantial evidence on record, were reasonably justifiable, concluding that the decision was not arbitrary, disproportionate, or tainted by procedural unfairness, thus upholding the disciplinary ruling.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Judicial Review of Professional Disciplinary Action: The court reasoned that the professional body, in its disciplinary proceedings, had followed the requisite procedural safeguards and that the findings of fact, supported by the substantial evidence on record, were reasonably justifiable, concluding that the decision was not arbitrary, disproportionate, or tainted by procedural unfairness, thus upholding the disciplinary ruling.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
contrôle juridictionnel sanction disciplinaire motif de révision arrêts en appréciation de validité motivation sur le fond décision motivée
Généré par l'IA
A/931/2014
Judicial Review of Professional Disciplinary Sanction within Statutory Jurisdiction
A/2961/2007
Judicial Review of Professional License Suspension Upheld
A/1189/2004
Judicial Review of Professional Licensing and Conduct Agency Decisions
A/1337/2004
Statutory Interpretation of Professional Conduct Regulations
A/2379/2006
Statutory Interpretation of Professional Regulation

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/1685/2008

### [ATAS/1054/2008](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1961997) du 23.09.2008 ( CHOMAG ) , CONCILIE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2008/0010/ATAS_001054_2008_A_1685_2008.pdf)

* /