Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/105/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/105/2006 Généré par l'IA

Contract Modification by Correspondence Validity

Numéro de cause ATAS/105/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute centered on whether a contract modification, executed through correspondence, was validly incorporated into the original written agreement, specifically concerning a change in the scope of work and associated compensation; the court reasoned that the modification, evidenced by the parties' written exchanges detailing the altered terms and the subsequent conduct demonstrating acceptance of those new terms, constituted a binding amendment to the contract, thereby superseding the provisions of the initial written document as to the matters addressed in the modification.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 64 LTF; Contract Modification by Correspondence Validity: The dispute centered on whether a contract modification, executed through correspondence, was validly incorporated into the original written agreement, specifically concerning a change in the scope of work and associated compensation; the court reasoned that the modification, evidenced by the parties' written exchanges detailing the altered terms and the subsequent conduct demonstrating acceptance of those new terms, constituted a binding amendment to the contract, thereby superseding the provisions of the initial written document as to the matters addressed in the modification.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
validité du contrat objet du litige réception de l'ouvrage modification du permis de construire modification du jugement modification de la demande

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.

Art. 64 LTF

The court granted the request for legal aid for the appellant.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               "#"$%%& "#%'"$%%&

((  

) ()   )( 

* + &  & ,- $%%& 



   !"#$ % &$'!  !''  #!#$ (&$)$#* +,!#

!$#

,,     (  #!"#&$'! #!$ '$'& -#'./0 "!$122 31334%12

                 !

   81598  

&''!#!""!'$'!(::'$!("!';'8"#4<( = 96!%>#166?0

#!#1@%'#1667!$#&''!"#&'$&0

#&"!( 1.@%'#16670

('!"#$'!"#!"#$'7:&%#'#1667!# A( ($BB&C$#$$#!##'#(#&3.!$!>#166? C  '  DEB  +   $'$# (!""!'$'! !$# # &''!  7 !$!>#166?F

#!'$(#$F3.F3!'#"#!&#''$#$'%31"$># 3/2?; =!A!#A!#$("#!&#''$#$'%&" !$'!GA$'!$#'%' "&!''$#$'%#%$ !"&$($# $!#'$&$:'$(!>@$("#!&#"$%$ '$ $!#'$&   "'!   "#!&# ''$#$'% "$    &D&$  H$#"#!!&@A(C#!'$!#A$'!0

$$ A  "#&$ "#!&# &"  ('   "#!&# "$ %$ 'DEB+ 0

(' !%'$  !&A  "#  "#&$   ($$$   "#!&#"#&'$&F





5351667  89598  



(  .  ()   )( 



/01,1   2  311 1  4! #&$ 5



3F +" ('$  ""'$'!  G#$F 3.   @AGC #!'$ !   "#!&#"$%$ 'DEB+ 0

1F &#%'$"#!&#0

9F :!#"#$'AG"%$:!###!#!$#"#&$##H$  &'  36 @!# 4  !$':'$'! "# "' #!& #&  #'> :&&## +DI'J#D!:A'7 766.  $#!'K"'#F  &'  "$ H$# "#!!B&F  &!'# !'$< = ''A# K$$ A &''!  #!#$ &'# !>$'#  ' $ "   &''! $$A&0 >= K"!#"!#A!$':'$'"!%!'##$$$#&''!0="!#$#  'B$# !   ! #"#&$$F +'  &!'#  !$'$  $#!' &&$ &&#& ! $$# = >= $ = '8   #'> :&&#  #  "!## " $##  $'4# #  #!# AG' %# &## '##%>F&!'##!#$'!#!#!-"#% A' #!$ @!'$  '' A  &''! $$A& $ G%!""  A   &$& K"&'&#!#$;#$F391 367$362=F  B#::'4#  #&'$   -+ &#'  

 !"'!:!# "#&$ ##H$$!$':'&K"#$'$+#&$#'$G $$C G&!!'"#B#::



5351667