Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/1046/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/1046/2005 Généré par l'IA

Tax Assessment Justification and Lump-Sum Method Challenge

Numéro de cause ATAS/1046/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant challenged a decision that partially rejected their appeal regarding a tax assessment, arguing that the administrative authority failed to properly justify the adjustments made to their income, specifically disputing the tax authority's power to apply a lump-sum assessment method and its failure to consider all submitted evidence. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the administrative authority provided sufficient justification for the assessment method used, which was deemed appropriate given the taxpayer's failure to adequately substantiate their reported income, and that the administrative review process sufficiently addressed the evidence presented by the taxpayer.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Tax Assessment Justification and Lump-Sum Method Challenge: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the administrative authority provided sufficient justification for the assessment method used, which was deemed appropriate given the taxpayer's failure to adequately substantiate their reported income, and that the administrative review process sufficiently addressed the evidence presented by the taxpayer.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
impôt forfaitaire taxations fiscales autorité fiscale déclaration des revenus appréciation des preuves recours contre des décisions administratives
Généré par l'IA
A/1397/2004
Tax Assessment Valuation Method Challenge
A/4090/2006
Tax Assessment Challenge Affirmed
A/1362/2006
Tax Assessment Validity and Valuation Methodology Challenge
A/414/2004
Taxpayer Challenge to Business Asset Valuation Methodology Upheld
A/2950/2018
Tax Assessment Appeal Rejection Regarding Inflated Rental Payments

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/276/2005

### [ATAS/1046/2005](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1958590) du 30.11.2005 ( AI ) , REJETE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2005/0010/ATAS_001046_2005_A_276_2005.pdf)

* /