Appeal Timeliness Based on Judgment Entry Date
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appellant sought review of a decision finding that the statutory period for appeal had expired because the notice of appeal was filed more than the allowed time after the judgment was entered, despite the appellant's claim that the time limit should be calculated from a later date when a specific post-judgment order was entered. The court reasoned that the applicable statute clearly dictates that the appeal period commences upon entry of the judgment, and subsequent discretionary or clarifying orders do not restart this timeline unless they modify the underlying judgment in a substantive way, which the order in question did not do; thus, the appeal was untimely.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Timeliness Based on Judgment Entry Date: The court reasoned that the applicable statute clearly dictates that the appeal period commences upon entry of the judgment, and subsequent discretionary or clarifying orders do not restart this timeline unless they modify the underlying judgment in a substantive way, which the order in question did not do; thus, the appeal was untimely.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAImposed the costs of the federal proceedings on the appellant.
Texte complet
! "##$ #%!"##$
&' (' ) & ') )
)*+, - ./., "##$
!"#$%&# %%& !& '!&(&% )
&%
' ++ , % & ! -./"#
,404,
6 &7! '66 &'%, # &!8 ,$%"9 ' :2.; 455/'%6&%&&'&% %&6%!$%8 ,$%"%%&:<
%%, %$%!&!$%#&45=&455/<
! ' & !2>$&?%455/&7! 2.; 455/<
&&% &@'%&A31A1 6!!%%$%& B!!%% & % C &?% 4555 8 : ;@DE D# $%!# E D&% &! %% D%% $& % !%% ! ! % $$ & &%@%%!&!6%!<
&&'$"<
' # &!@!%%%%?;&&%-% %F<
%& &! /35 6%A % ! E %%& E )%B' & !A
) 0 (' ) & ') )
2A !%%%?;&<
4A -%F<
1A ' E#%% &!/356%AE%%&< B%66 "% $%! & -+ !%
$ 6%$%!&%%G&&& 6 !7$%& @DED66 6!!% % $%B%66
012320455/