Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/1039/2008 • CJ GE ATAS/1039/2008 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Regarding Mandatory Arbitration Clause and Prior Mediation Requirement

Numéro de cause ATAS/1039/2008
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case involved an appeal against a decision concerning the application of a mandatory arbitration clause in a contract, where the appellant argued that the dispute was not subject to arbitration because a necessary condition for invoking the clause had not been met, specifically related to the required mediation attempt prior to arbitration. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the procedural requirement for prior mediation was not a substantive prerequisite for the validity of the arbitration agreement itself, and therefore, the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal was properly established based on the contractual consent to arbitrate, even if the mediation prerequisite had not been fully satisfied before the initiation of the arbitration proceedings.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Regarding Mandatory Arbitration Clause and Prior Mediation Requirement: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the procedural requirement for prior mediation was not a substantive prerequisite for the validity of the arbitration agreement itself, and therefore, the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal was properly established based on the contractual consent to arbitrate, even if the mediation prerequisite had not been fully satisfied before the initiation of the arbitration proceedings.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
validité de clause compromissoire contentieux contractuel condition de recevabilité désignation des arbitres clause normative règlement du conflit de compétence

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The Appellant must pay the costs of the federal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/117/2008

### [ATAS/1039/2008](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1961984) du 23.09.2008 ( LAA ) , REJETE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2008/0010/ATAS_001039_2008_A_117_2008.pdf)

* /