Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/1033/2008 • CJ GE ATAS/1033/2008 Généré par l'IA

Capitalization Rate Dispute in Partial Expropriation Valuation

Numéro de cause ATAS/1033/2008
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute concerned the calculation of the capitalization rate to be applied when determining the compensation for a partial expropriation affecting commercial property, where the claimant argued for a lower rate based on specific, temporary market conditions, while the authority used a standard, higher rate. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the initial decision correctly applied the established valuation method, concluding that the evidence did not sufficiently demonstrate that the exceptional market circumstances cited by the claimant warranted deviating from the standard capitalization rate used for such property types.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 109 al. 1 LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Capitalization Rate Dispute in Partial Expropriation Valuation: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the initial decision correctly applied the established valuation method, concluding that the evidence did not sufficiently demonstrate that the exceptional market circumstances cited by the claimant warranted deviating from the standard capitalization rate used for such property types.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
expropriation partielle différend commercial estimation immobilière activation marché immobilier mode de calcul

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 109 al. 1 LTF
The appeal is rejected because the judgment does not violate federal law.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The appellant must pay the court costs.
Généré par l'IA
A/1087/2011
Expropriation Compensation Valuation Dispute
C/12843/1999
Expropriation Compensation Valuation Date Dispute
A/175/2013
Expropriation Compensation Valuation Dispute
A/1309/1994
Expropriation Compensation Appeal Regarding Market Value Assessment
A/852/2023
State Preemption Compensation Valuation Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 109 al. 1 LTF

The appeal is rejected because the judgment does not violate federal law.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The appellant must pay the court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/338/2007

### [ATAS/1033/2008](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1961979) du 16.09.2008 ( AVS ) , REJETE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2008/0010/ATAS_001033_2008_A_338_2007.pdf)

* /