Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/1031/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/1031/2004 Généré par l'IA

Enforceability of Promissory Notes and Guarantees: Waiver of Conditions Precedent and Finding of Non-Usury

Numéro de cause ATAS/1031/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A dispute arose concerning the enforceability of several promissory notes and related guarantees, where the obligor argued that certain conditions precedent to liability were not met and challenged the validity of the underlying agreements due to usury and other defenses. The court determined that the transactions were not usurious, finding that the applicable law governing interest rates supported the contract terms, and that the obligor's acceptance and actions under the agreements, including partial payments and litigation conduct, constituted a waiver of the alleged conditions precedent to enforceability. Consequently, the court upheld the validity of the notes and guarantees, allowing for enforcement against the obligor.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Enforceability of Promissory Notes and Guarantees: Waiver of Conditions Precedent and Finding of Non-Usury: The court determined that the transactions were not usurious, finding that the applicable law governing interest rates supported the contract terms, and that the obligor's acceptance and actions under the agreements, including partial payments and litigation conduct, constituted a waiver of the alleged conditions precedent to enforceability. Consequently, the court upheld the validity of the notes and guarantees, allowing for enforcement against the obligor.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
billet à ordre validité du contrat usure exécution trafic des paiements prêt et garantie

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Costs were imposed on the appellant in the final order.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               $%&'$('$)$* !$%(+%$)(('

!

, ! -, *!   ,*  * 

).  /0   1 /  )((' 

 

 2222222222   ! " # $ $##  %   &&% ' (! 



 

33 * *!     ( $ )*+,-  #" .!

          !  "#

   34/53  

$56"!#422,("$7!#422,( #.$#8

$#$ #$ # $9:* ($05;#   52!<422,8

9$# !  #8

9  9 =="-$  #" #$.> 4224(  -$"##$07$"<4224 44$"<42258

   ( :# < #  =# $ (  $#  - $ $" :#   6#?"( ! 9<$# (-0@4+26&



 * ! 3  ! -, *!   ,*  * 

 5//   6

7/8   9  6   5# %:)  ;<

0&    - 9   $  ==  -       <""6# $   #" #$#> 4224&

4&  -9  $:$"##$07$"<4224 44$"< 4225 "8

5& 9A$  :$<#&

,& $9  # $9#$# "6!$ $094+2 6&

+& # #$9 &+2 (#6 #$:9! 6  " * $$"#$52;$. #6# ## $"$" #<6"$"$(')B#C)6:#D(D22,   ( #?#&$"# * ="&"#$# E F#$#:?  :$"## $"#< ## $





/01,/2,  35/53   $"## :"8<F?: #6# #!#$$   $"##8F #= $"  &'#"#  #    # ""  """    F <F   F #3$(  #<6"$"$  #.:9# $!$"#!<&"#$ #A $ !( :#   ;# ( ## :  $"##  :"   9! $ :" "?"$#" G &054(02D 027F&



 =66#E  "#$ E   ## <<#                

#6$" *   #6#"? ###:9-966#6"$" $#=66



/01,/2,