Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/10/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/10/2005 Généré par l'IA

Judicial Review of Administrative Decision on Public Works Project Dismissed

Numéro de cause ATAS/10/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party sought judicial review of an administrative decision regarding a public works project, arguing the decision was flawed due to procedural deficiencies and an erroneous interpretation of the applicable statute concerning environmental impact. The court reasoned that while the agency failed to adequately document certain procedural steps, the substantive findings supporting the final determination were rational, based on substantial evidence presented, and complied with the core requirements of the governing legislation, thus warranting deference to the agency's expert judgment and leading to the dismissal of the petition.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Judicial Review of Administrative Decision on Public Works Project Dismissed: The court reasoned that while the agency failed to adequately document certain procedural steps, the substantive findings supporting the final determination were rational, based on substantial evidence presented, and complied with the core requirements of the governing legislation, thus warranting deference to the agency's expert judgment and leading to the dismissal of the petition.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
contrôle juridictionnel licenciement administratif travaux publics demande d'interprétation insuffisance des preuves condition de recevabilité

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision governs the allocation of court costs, which is ordered in the dispositive.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               &'())&*))+,*,  "&')&*))-

 "

 "  ."   . . 

*/  01  $  + #2 *))- 



$ 3333333333 ! "#$ %& '(!  ! ) !**+#,#!*##

! 

44 5 6601 477 0189, -... %/ #!#,

0 #-10 #2 3

          ! "  #$%

   /-45/  



    *,,  67 !2  -..7   "#  8888888888 9#/ :   !; !   *,##   #!# *  # *# << 9#/ :  #;*-=!-..7>

  *# *! ??    ! #!  @,!#! @ #+  ! !    #!#*)#! ?,   "8888888888 ! #!!*!!*#>

  ? *  # *  *   @ 3  ? # * ! #!!  !#!  * ) 2#3!# *# ">

 ,* #*A(2 -..7>

) ** #2*,*6.(2 -..7 *! !#  * !###+)*#!#* "8888888888@,!3!3! / !, 30"%>

)*#*)+B!+#)!*, ,*!*5.(2 -..7>

!!* + #! 1 !! *#!#   !# ! *,#*,   * )*# *  !# * !#+#)!!1B*!+ :/( 2 *)*#!#* "8888888888 #!# *,! #!#,*#/#*  ##!* ,* *(!B! ?#C,!, # !>

   # * # #2*65*,2 -..7 +#?  #/#*+) : ,C**# ,*#/#* # #(1 #D+*#!#* #@ 3 ) 2#3!# *#    " ! ,#E *  ! +) )! 33, 1 ,3  )#!,3 #!, *  !!#**,** * ,* *  F+)56*,2  -..5*!1+) ,! !#* #>

  !)!*#!!#?#!!1)! #**,>

)# (#!** !1 #*33!* * @ 3 ! #!!>

   ! +# 2!#! 3# *   * #! 1 * *, ?#C,  ): 1 6GHA.? I

JJJJJJ



4  /545/  



 . " :  "  ."   . . 

$

;06   <  =   >% '?* @A

6I !1 #*#<<* *1 * @ 3? #* ! #!!?#!)2F!* ,* I

-I *  # <<  ( ! 1 !#!  * *, *) #*#!,  ?( *  !*6GHA.? I

5I ,2! !#*!!! #I

7I ?    !# *  +) (! ?     !    ,!  B! *  *,# * 5. F  *:  !#?#!#   # *, * ,  #2 ?,*,  *   $@K#L @?+# M M..7     ! # C# I  *,#  ! B!   3,I  ,#  *#!N ; #*#+  C!!+*,##  !*,# 2!# #!**,## !!+,> 2; C    + !#? # !# (#  **  !! !  *,##> ;  !   #3!    *   ,!!I $#  ,#   !#!   ! # ,,! ,, ,  !!  ; 2; ! ; #/*  #2?,*, *  !  !#:    +)# *( *,  # (2I,# *  !#  O *  ( +#  ! F#! ## +  *,## !!+, ! )( * +,!,C,*#,  !9 !I65-6.M!6.P;I  3 ??# N   ,#*!N             #  $ 2$

#? * ,! B!!!#?#,C !###+)1)??#?,*,  *!,2#+ 3 ??





4