Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/10/2003 • CJ GE ATAS/10/2003 Généré par l'IA

Review of Demurrer Sustained Without Leave for Failure to Plead Fiduciary Duty in Investment Advice Case

Numéro de cause ATAS/10/2003
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party sought a review of a ruling that sustained a demurrer without leave to amend against their complaint alleging causes of action including professional negligence and breach of fiduciary duty related to investment management and advice. The court reasoned that the complaint failed to state a cause of action because the pleaded allegations, even if taken as true, did not establish the requisite duty owed by the defendant to the plaintiff, noting that a broad contractual relationship alone does not automatically create a fiduciary duty, and the facts alleged did not rise to the level of an attorney-client or other recognized fiduciary relationship sufficient to support the claims asserted.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Review of Demurrer Sustained Without Leave for Failure to Plead Fiduciary Duty in Investment Advice Case: The court reasoned that the complaint failed to state a cause of action because the pleaded allegations, even if taken as true, did not establish the requisite duty owed by the defendant to the plaintiff, noting that a broad contractual relationship alone does not automatically create a fiduciary duty, and the facts alleged did not rise to the level of an attorney-client or other recognized fiduciary relationship sufficient to support the claims asserted.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
fiduciaire manquement au devoir violation du devoir de motiver conseil en placement cause de la demande défaut de preuve de solvabilité

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Cited in the dispositive to regulate court costs.
Généré par l'IA
C/1242/2018
Appeal Regarding Fiduciary Reimbursement and Procedural Standards
C/15503/2018
Appellate Review of Damages Award in Fiduciary Fee Dispute Involving Procedural Joinder Error and Contractual Admission
A/1190/2005
Agent Fiduciary Duty Breach Financial Instruments Disclosure Upheld
C/27386/2009
Investment Manager Breach of Conservative Mandate
C/28984/2009
Shareholder Suit Against Directors for Breach of Fiduciary Duty Regarding Investment Strategy Upheld on Appeal

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Cited in the dispositive to regulate court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



         

    #$%&$#'(($ )#$(#'((%

*)

 )  )+    +

" ' , - '((%

$. / -





   01111111111 2" 





 +00 )+    3 45)  !" #!##$   #%  

               !"   "

#$%&$#'(($    $!&'$ 

 0)

 ) *+,-)........../01+0,2#3 '+450!%64 #31()78$,4+00+0#654#339)+044+!!654#339/ 4  5+4 + ,4 4  :0 5 ;;  # 654 #339+55)

*+, -)..........  +00  !! ,2 #331 < + =;;4  + =$454+40 >4$< = ?  +,+ 54 @ =4 +=  +=454+40) =  4    +A0 +=454+40 + #((B + # 64  %( 5,2 #333/ 4 + "(B >;) 0 + 1 654 !((#?)+044+!954!((#/*+,-)..........00,4200;4 +=  4</ 0 040 C  +4 @   4< @ , + # +0,2#333/2+A0+=454+40+"(B/+D;4C= E44+55)

)  4  5+4 + ,4  0+0 @  F + +4  040 C  +44 +=4 +=  + 55 =04040,4) +</+044+!1,2!((#/ 4;,0=400C +554044,0C +404 0+4@+,4$+=454+40+4#2!((#) 4040C + +044 + 44 45 8 4 50 @  4 4 +004,)

) *+,-)..........460!12+4 +044/+0C

G6  ,+  C4 6  4;4   +44  4C=@ =0C + , ,4A 5  A45;/6=54!(6=40504+ ++H+,44;4C454#%& 1  9   540 @  ;,  4) 7 4 ,0+46,4+04+0+C46=54E48 +=I 0 +    + 4 , ;4  0 

&#% #&!((# $%&'$ 

,E:4CC40424+0040/+6;; 6+=E4 / 4C= +,4$  ,= 00 +0J

  054 + ## 654 !((!/  4   6 +    6C=G0+0C=0200;4+4,0,4/ ,4+=24A4+454,22,I+0J)



 +)

 ;,K

  460 < +  ,,44  +  7$ ,4/>41  7'3 ?52)

00,4+=;;40 42;,0,@ =4 %/ ) % +  4 + #  5,2 !((! ,+4;4  4  =A44 6+444>?)



;+K

#)  +044 + !9 54 !((#/ *+, -).......... 54  I ,4  200;4 +=  4< +=454+40 ;,0, @ =4 % ) #  /8,+C455L5;E4+44,0,@   + 545 + M$544  545  @   + M$454+40/4200;44+=+=454+404<) = 050C450)



&#% #&!((# $ &'$ 

!)  +044 + !1 ,2 !((#/  4 44,0  + 4+00 C =0  ,44  040   +44 +=4 += +554+<4,0+4@4<+=454+40)

;;/4*+,-)..........=+4@+55/ =4+=+,4$I54A0+<#+0,2#333/+@, +C+A0+=454+40+"(B400)

%) 7=4!% 7K

N555;+4@4/+0<+ 64/44;)N

N74,408;+55+5;K

) ;+64+00+0C4/++0</5454 ,0A ,, 5  55   5;  C4  44545/+M4!"/%40O

2)  ; 44   + M4 !"/ % 40/ C4/ ++0</5454,0A,,555 5;C4+064545)N

N +4 @   + 55  + 5; + 4  ,4 6 + ,4 C4 4  +0< + 64 / CM ; 44  +0 ;,0,  ! 40/2/,46+,445M+4)N

) =4!  74CK

N  +450  4,40 @  55  @  5;K

) 744;C,4A+0 ,4+48O 2) 74,4A+0,4+484+454 <C+4504 "05O 74+#105<C+450 4 "05)N



&#% #&!((# $"&'$ 

-+C=+=;C= =54 "05++450!%64#31() =44 +4@+550CI,4200;4+ =4 %)# ),;+0)



&#% #&!((# $'&'$ 

  +)0  )  )+    +

"

 6 7  #) P4O  " 7

#) 6O  !) ;,4+CM5;,0I +  +04 + %( 6 +<  4;44  4 ,,+0 +0  42;0+0+/7EQ4HE;C4'/'((   /4 8,4)  ,0,4 +4 K ? 4+4C 8, C +044  +04244++044C0O2?8 C,4;4,54+,++044O? 4A++0) 74,0,44 400,0,00?2??4$+/ 42;0+0 +,4<CM4+5+0 452)  ,0,4 +  ,4   ,: + 5/ C4  64  ,0,4 M4 MA4 + 4<  4 + ) 7 0A, 64  ,0,4  +044 C0  M5 + C0080+40>)#%!/#('#(1?)  

A;;4<K 04+K  *4$4  R 4S   







0I,,4C04;448444C=@=;;4;0+0 +4A;;



&#% #&!((#