Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATA/96/2015 • CJ GE ATA/96/2015 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Dismissed: Administrative Penalty Time-Bar Argument Rejected Due to Interruption of Limitation Period

Numéro de cause ATA/96/2015
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case involves a rejection of an appeal concerning the application of an administrative penalty, where the appellant argued that the penalty was time-barred due to the expiration of the statutory limitation period. The court ruled that the limitation period was effectively interrupted by the initiation of prior proceedings, which were deemed valid for the purpose of resetting the time limit for imposing the penalty, thus upholding the decision to dismiss the appeal as unfounded.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 93 LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Dismissed: Administrative Penalty Time-Bar Argument Rejected Due to Interruption of Limitation Period: The court ruled that the limitation period was effectively interrupted by the initiation of prior proceedings, which were deemed valid for the purpose of resetting the time limit for imposing the penalty, thus upholding the decision to dismiss the appeal as unfounded.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
interruption de la prescription prescription de peine délai de péremption légal licenciement administratif détention excessive durée de l'infraction

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 93 LTF
The appeal was rejected, indicating this article was likely the basis for the decision regarding the procedural outcome.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This article governs the allocation of costs, which was decided in the final orders.
Généré par l'IA
A/3197/2018
Appeal Struck Due to Time-Barred Prosecution
A/4005/2021
Taxpayer Appeal Dismissed as Time-Barred
A/3081/2022
Appeal Dismissed as Untimely Despite Jurisprudence Argument
A/654/2005
Appeal Dismissed as Time-Barred Despite Illness Argument
P/6829/2018
Appeal of Time-Barred Penalty Opposition Ruling

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 93 LTF

The appeal was rejected, indicating this article was likely the basis for the decision regarding the procedural outcome.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article governs the allocation of costs, which was decided in the final orders.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/2195/2013

### [ATA/96/2015](/apps/decis/fr/ata/show/1887427) du 20.01.2015 sur JTAPI/649/2014 ( ICCIFD ) , REJETE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/ata/file/2015/0000/ATA_000096_2015_A_2195_2013.pdf)

* /