Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATA/95/2015 • CJ GE ATA/95/2015 Généré par l'IA

Contractor Compensation Claim Denial in Public Works Dispute

Numéro de cause ATA/95/2015
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case involved a challenge to a decision by the administrative tribunal concerning a request for compensation related to damage allegedly sustained by a contractor due to the termination of a public works contract. The court rejected the appeal, upholding the tribunal's finding that the contractor had not demonstrated a causal link between the purported damage and the specific actions or faults attributed to the contracting authority, concluding that the termination itself, under the contract's terms, did not automatically entitle the contractor to the specific damages claimed, thus affirming the initial dismissal of the compensation claim.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 109 al. 1 LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contractor Compensation Claim Denial in Public Works Dispute: The court rejected the appeal, upholding the tribunal's finding that the contractor had not demonstrated a causal link between the purported damage and the specific actions or faults attributed to the contracting authority, concluding that the termination itself, under the contract's terms, did not automatically entitle the contractor to the specific damages claimed, thus affirming the initial dismissal of the compensation claim.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
travaux publics entrepreneur licenciement ou résiliation de contrat action en indemnité contrat de droit administratif droit de la fonction publique

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 109 al. 1 LTF

This provision was used to declare the appeal inadmissible.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision dictates the allocation of court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/2193/2013

### [ATA/95/2015](/apps/decis/fr/ata/show/1887426) du 20.01.2015 sur JTAPI/647/2014 ( ICCIFD ) , REJETE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/ata/file/2015/0000/ATA_000095_2015_A_2193_2013.pdf)

* /