Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATA/802/2005 • CJ GE ATA/802/2005 Généré par l'IA

Contract Term Validity Upheld Against Unconscionability Claim

Numéro de cause ATA/802/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party initiated an action seeking a declaration that a particular contract term was void as unconscionable, arguing it was both substantively and procedurally unfair due to unequal bargaining power and oppressive terms relating to limitations on remedies and liability waivers for specific types of damages. The court, after reviewing the circumstances surrounding the contract's formation and the specific clauses in question, concluded that while there were some imbalances in the negotiation, the contractual provisions did not rise to the level of unconscionability required to void the term, primarily because the complaining party had a meaningful opportunity to review and object to the terms and the resulting limitations were not so extreme as to shock the conscience, thus upholding the validity of the contract term.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Contract Term Validity Upheld Against Unconscionability Claim: The court, after reviewing the circumstances surrounding the contract's formation and the specific clauses in question, concluded that while there were some imbalances in the negotiation, the contractual provisions did not rise to the level of unconscionability required to void the term, primarily because the complaining party had a meaningful opportunity to review and object to the terms and the resulting limitations were not so extreme as to shock the conscience, thus upholding the validity of the contract term.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
validité du contrat clauses abusives responsabilité contractuelle action en indemnité clause compromissoire compétence en matière de contrats conclus par les consommateurs
Généré par l'IA
A/2831/2005
Contract Enforcement Upheld Despite Unconscionability Claim
A/1568/2002
Arbitration Clause Validity and Unconscionability Finding
A/2410/2006
Contract Enforceability and Unconscionability Dispute
A/3226/2005
Contract Amendment Validity: Consideration and Unconscionability
A/247/2004
Contract Enforcement and Validity Dispute

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

         

       

 



      

 !"#$!

%$"!%$!%&$ '%'!((!% 





%'!$)* 



 +     +,  



     !"# 

   ()) *)  #+ , !''% *  -)  ./)    -)0)1) *234 5)67)89999999999*.))  (0)   (0): 6 ) *(-);:  ) ;) )))  )-(<)(0)*()=:7-(<)*> *.))?*()@

 -2A()/())*()(@

 -   (*( * 78 89999999999  ) ()) *   !B *./!''%@

 -?).*)**)+B-./!''%@

 -*)*((*(*7889999999999*;A) ?0*)C(/).6?)0)())4 @

 -  (.))  4   ? * 6  . *-))  ))  *.)  ) 6 78 89999999999  ?  ?)   *(*(()-6*)*(.)(@

      

.>D.*-))@

))*.))67889999999999@

?) 6 )  -(<)  (0) *() =:   7   -(<) *>*.)?*()??)*( *()))(**)*(E-./!''%@

(-;)*(F>?6)F0(;@

) > ;.(. A ) E&  )-   ) ;(( G0)) F))):  *( ()) * D *(: * -)    ) .)));:   )A F 2  );)): * -  )/ ;((@  .(.))))>):.);.C*-*  )0.)@)()A.*) .)  )/ ;((: +'''  +$@  *( ())   *)2  *)  : )->( .. .C  *-: )- D F) 6 G-)@

"#$%&"!''% #"# 

..)>  *( ()):  *): 6 7) 89999999999 )) >G -)./)-)0)8

  *() )/.)));3     =8C<2 

*);.())((..)>(A*)8

 2-:  0;;)23         

"#$%&"!''%