Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATA/798/2004 • CJ GE ATA/798/2004 Généré par l'IA

Contract Amendment Validity and Mutual Assent

Numéro de cause ATA/798/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerns a dispute over the validity and enforcement of a contract amendment that modified obligations, where one party alleged the amendment was invalid due to lack of mutual assent, citing various inconsistencies and ambiguities in the drafting and subsequent conduct regarding key terms like payment schedules and contract scope. The court ultimately upheld the trial court's finding that the parties had objectively manifested assent to the contract amendment, reasoning that despite some ambiguities, the parties' consistent course of performance and documentation demonstrated a mutual understanding and intent to be bound by the revised terms, thereby validating the amendment's enforceability.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 64 LTF; Contract Amendment Validity and Mutual Assent: The court ultimately upheld the trial court's finding that the parties had objectively manifested assent to the contract amendment, reasoning that despite some ambiguities, the parties' consistent course of performance and documentation demonstrated a mutual understanding and intent to be bound by the revised terms, thereby validating the amendment's enforceability.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
validité du contrat contrat bilatéral imparfait objet du litige modification de la demande clause compromissoire cadre commun de référence

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied to order the appellant to pay the court costs.

Art. 64 LTF

Applied to grant the request for legal aid to the appellant.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

        

        

 

   

 !"







#### 



$$ $$ $

"

$### 





     !"# 

$ 

$(  %)*!''#+*,-.* /,0*12//344 /35****/-*/)/4,6+*)*,  2)*(  37** 3 /2 -+ -* 8 3//-**)  *6*4*6**,.-*$9:''/*,!''%1 +2;2+4*//;.* /,0/ < 1+/2#(

!(    2* *)/*+ = 44  22 )* 8  *+ *   3/*( ( ((8(.* /,0 (1+(>((<( (8,-.* /,0 >(1(

   ( 5 >( -* )2  /2**+ 5  * -* 4*  ))*5*72/83)6)***(

  <344>(+/*=3*3**2*-** ?>$@'(  ?> #A:( + * 3 * 3*;)*  ?> $9'%:(   ?> B9@$:( +  */4C+58=+ ?>$@'(  ?>$9'!:( /*,(

    D2+ ( //*  * /  / <  8 ?> $#:(   ?>B'(   /*,(  * *)/ 3**2* C*  ?> $#@(   ?>!A:( /*,(/*=3*3*;)*32;* ?>$&'(   ?>B''( /*,( =*/4+/*=** ?>#'(   ?>$A@( /*,(

%(   44  22 E2 /  7/  ; 4)2 /  *+   ))6-*22;**/=/2*)*,F**5+)* /)/4,6+**5/*)*,2-//) 6( )3E+);222*628 (+3//2**76  344  22 5*4*2 3=( 344  >( 2* *44*   7* -*)(

#(  3-* 3F**  );2  5*  22 /6*2   >* 3-* 44**.* /,0> 1!@F*!''#(

:(   *  %' F* !''#+ >(  **  *6 )***4 3 ( /*7-*+)***2**/*/,*5 4*=*4*/*)62+/*-*7 * 6*  6  2** /-* )**  **(  7* 5   );2 2;// 8 32)* 7-*( <*  2** 2* 4*)2+**/)*** /*6( 83*2****7*8 5);2***62(

"$%&!"!''# %"# 

B(  -*2 8  2)*+  *  8 3*-6**2  +  7*4 3*//*2 *-52  /- G ( 344 3 ( 2* ) )* );2(

A(   2**  $: F* !''#+  -* /2*  *6 )***4  F2  5G 344 /*4+ /, 5  /*  4 2)*2 8  27(

@(  */*728 (4**/)2)* 4+- *6)***4-)*H42I(

$% 

$(  F22**=F/2-/3*$:3 *   );2 /6*  !: -)6 $&&# . J   B ':1+ -  F*** )/2    3* % *2 $   * *  * 3  8 ;283 *);2/6*$!F*$&&A.B':(''K *1+-6/*-(

!(  <3*B$*/2)***-$!/)6$&@: .    : $'1+   /- G 4)2 / -**  *+ E )/* 3=,  36  /-* 3//2**+ ** 5 / * *=  *)/,  4* /*(  -;+  F*** )***- 3 / )/2 / //2* 3//*2   2** 52+ 4 =/* /2-/*(

  3/,+7*44)2/>(,-/2*2)3//*2+  )   2** **7*+ )*   ,7 )*  / /  27*5*3*6*);2/6*(7 5  );2 2;// 8 ,-  )  /*  /2*+  **5 6*);*=*(

  ,+22*-6(

%(  -*+2))/2+ ?>$3:''( +)*8 ;7.(@A 1(

&'$% ( $   

2*-6*F2%'F*!''#/(>(<( (2** *,-$F-*!''$L

"$%&!"!''# #"# 

)8;72)) ?>$3:''( L

))*5/2G8(>(<( (**598*,-8 (<( ((

<*270J(E;,+/2*+J)-E?*+J( ;2*+J)+F7(

) *6 )***40

744*, F*F(0  /2*0     J( * >(E;,  

/*4)G22))*52=/*(

 ,-+  744*,0           

"$%&!"!''#