Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATA/774/2005 • CJ GE ATA/774/2005 Généré par l'IA

Financing Agreement Breach and Damages Appeal

Numéro de cause ATA/774/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerns an appeal challenging a lower court's finding of liability and an associated monetary award arising from a contractual dispute, specifically concerning the provision of services under a financing agreement. The appellate court reasoned that the evidence presented, including the written contract terms and the parties' subsequent actions, sufficiently supported the finding that the appellant breached the agreement by failing to adhere to stipulated performance metrics or obligations, and that the lower court did not err in its interpretation of the contract's governing clauses or in its calculation of damages, thus affirming the judgment below.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Financing Agreement Breach and Damages Appeal: The appellate court reasoned that the evidence presented, including the written contract terms and the parties' subsequent actions, sufficiently supported the finding that the appellant breached the agreement by failing to adhere to stipulated performance metrics or obligations, and that the lower court did not err in its interpretation of the contract's governing clauses or in its calculation of damages, thus affirming the judgment below.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
interprétation du contrat action en indemnité notion de décision prestation de services compétence en matière de contrats conclus par les consommateurs contrat de prêt

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

        

       

 

       

 !"









#$" %&&&&&&&

 







'()%% 





     !"# 

) 

)*  +,#+-.!%%(/01*2222222+3  1. -1114   5+  5* * 61 +3 7 5+8 +391,+19-1*

  :+,1,-+,-9:1,,1,;,+; 9<$%+-. !%%(/0**2222222+=,;5+;  1  ,  1 1 >1 41 + 9 ;  ,1 : --  ?@ )%*  +  41 :1-  =39 ; :1 : -.-41-,1A*

  5  / 1 ++1  1. -1114   11  11B/   1.    1 61 +3 7 58 :,1 + -+, +    -+11    ,1  C1 +19:111;1,B-+11+>11, :B/+,>+1/9:1+>111D :91+11+*

!*  5+,+)>-.!%%(119/+13;:++1/>1 -., ; 0**2222222  ?@ )%*  9: >1 ,1* 5+ 11 ; :++,11  1.  , :++1,  -  1  5*

$*    9<  CB ,,B,/ 0* *2222222   +,1, 9:1 ,1 -111,;1*

) * 

)*  +1)C>1!%%%/ 1.-1114:1,+,1 11    -13 -111> 6* (E * )   1  :B11C111!!>-.)&#)   !%(8*

!*  >13:A-191,+B10**2222222*5 :1E%.1+,-111>)!+-.)&F( 6    ( )%8/  91, + 1/   + 91 =, 1-+,111,<1B+1;9:1 ,-141,*

  :1E%. -<-+,9:1)%$1 4,, :B11 C111  )E ,-. )&#$ 6  5 )'$*))%8

6 "!(&"!%%!  )# -1 !%%!   C1+ 1,8*   1

"$%&'"!%%( $"# 

>1  1,< +19 ; :-11  / 1 9  -11 1 ++ ; 1 +  >B/   ,-19/ -,1  1,

6 @ ) *#'"!%%!  )E >1 !%%! 1* $ G )!)  $& 1* !" +* #$ G *0H/1-1114+11B11  -13  +1  :>1- 1  !%%)/ +* !#F/ * !(!  *    *I00 0 //1 * *0 /1 :>1-7-1J>11/)&&!/+*))'8* 1,< 1   <  6 @ ! *!'("!%%!  )! -1 !%%$ 1* )*!8*  1.,,C;:1CB91:1 .1 >1 ,, ,11, :>1 + :1,<  ; 1  :11 :A+1  11 41B  1 1 6 "(#F"!%%#  )( C1 !%%#8*

$*  :+3/0**2222222.B1+195+1>, -- ?@)%* 1,-1+1-*

  11++,:1,<,1 :1E% * 44/1 1:++,1--- -1,B---K:1,6 "E#%"!%%(!'+-. !%%(8*+/1.A:++-1111:.1 -1=;:1/1+991 >11+,1C1/,+,-1/1 <=,+ 5-+11,:B + 1.-1114+441->*

  ,-1+,/+-1 5*

#*  :111B/1++L:,--1,:1-1, 6* F'  8*  / 91 B1  +/ :3B + >1 A+,  41+11++,*

 MMMMM

'()*  )       

, 1>. 1C,#+-.!%%(+01*2222222 5+ 5* *G

19:1:++L:,--1,:1-1,G

--19+,<;01*2222222119:;5+ 5* *

"$%&'"!%%( #"# 

51,B7 0->N/+,1/0*N=3/0-?1/0* =,1/0-/ CB*

- 1.-11147

B4413 C1C*7  >1 +,17     0* 1 *>N  

+14-<,,--19,A+1*

 3>/  B44137           

"$%&'"!%%(