Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATA/693/2005 • CJ GE ATA/693/2005 Généré par l'IA

Appellate Decision on Compelling Arbitration of Fraudulent Inducement Claims

Numéro de cause ATA/693/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellate court reviewed a ruling that denied a motion to compel arbitration, stemming from a dispute where one party alleged they were fraudulently induced into signing an agreement containing an arbitration clause. The court reasoned that because the challenge was directed at the contract as a whole, including the inducement claim, the validity of the arbitration clause itself was governed by the contract's stated terms, which mandated that the arbitrator, not the court, decide gateway issues of contract formation and validity, thus reversing the lower court's decision to compel arbitration.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 64 LTF; Appellate Decision on Compelling Arbitration of Fraudulent Inducement Claims: The court reasoned that because the challenge was directed at the contract as a whole, including the inducement claim, the validity of the arbitration clause itself was governed by the contract's stated terms, which mandated that the arbitrator, not the court, decide gateway issues of contract formation and validity, thus reversing the lower court's decision to compel arbitration.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
validité de clause compromissoire juge arbitre dol principal partie au contrat justes motifs adjudication aux enchères

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied for the allocation of court costs.

Art. 64 LTF

Applied for the granting of legal aid.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

        

       

 

      

 !

"# !$!%&



  &$%! '((((((((((         )** ) *    )* +*)  ,  -          *)  +*)



     !"# 

 

)*   +,,  % - !''(. ,/,+  0 121 3 4,.  11,,     4,  +5 6, 478  9  /,1++,,:,,,4++,,4

4+,+.47 ,-1,,,/*

$*   ,  )# - !''(. +4+  0 121 ; : 1,+44+,+.,-+,+:,, /,@,/,,433,5+5,,14,.; 4, :,A-,,+.  +, +B+  , )& - !''( ; )!B'' 4 14++,,,@,.34+1,/ 1C4A*

5// ,-1,,,//,@:,,,/1++4D, *

+,341,/4,*

  F@,.://,++5+;05*

 * 

)*  0+  14 , A  0,,, 14+.    A-4,A6*(% ,G5,,0,,,!! A1-)?#)   !'(H*&*(*)'*),:44,, ,/+++0:+-,1+5)%0,)?EEI F I>!*)'9*

!*   44,,  :, )' ,+ ! F .  ,- 1,,,/ ,30@,,A,,*

     ++ +4,+ 4  ,- 1,,,/  )# - !''(*+,11+;,71,+B+,A, !# - !''(*    0 ,.  ,-  + 4  +, 4+,+*

"$%$&"!''( $"# 

$*  F G, %( ,+ )  . G   ,  4, :,A-,,+.  +,5,   +,, @+   ,  *

   :47.    ++ J1 ,/1+ @    ,/,,433,5,*+,4+4A,/1,  ++ +*  :C  /, + ,.  1,7 ,147  K. @1,:+B+/,3+.B+,*

  C,74:,A-,,+.,, 6*&! 9*

#*   +11  L> $''*   1, ;  B5   6* E&  9* MMMMM

+) *         

+,,11,,4,+5% -!''(H

1;B5+11 L>$''* H

, @. /1+1 3 , ?&  ,A   , /++ G5,, 0,,,.4+2424+.4A,,1,,,/.   0 7  ,/,,. 4 A  ,- /++H  1+1,  ,,,@,.1,/1C4A4,5 1,H,,2+,314,1, ,- /++. )'''  )#H  4+ 2   4,7  4,  .,A@+111C4A.,A20,;GA,H

  4,  +5. ; ://,,  4,. ; ://,    44,. ,, @:; ://, /++  :,11,5,.  :,+5,   :+1,5,*

F,+58 <*CB7.4+,.<* B+,<1.05*





"$%$&"!''( #"# 

1 ,-1,,,/8

5//,7 0,0*8  4+,8     <* , >*CB7   

4,/12++11,@+34,*

 7A.  5//,78           

"$%$&"!''(