Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATA/685/2006 • CJ GE ATA/685/2006 Généré par l'IA

Statutory Interpretation of Professional Regulation

Numéro de cause ATA/685/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party sought review of a decision concerning the interpretation and application of a statute regarding the regulation of certain professional services, specifically challenging the lower court's finding that the requirements for licensure or registration were met or that the conduct in question fell outside the scope of the regulatory statute. The court affirmed the lower court's judgment, reasoning that the plain language of the controlling statute and relevant precedent supported the conclusion that the regulatory framework did not apply to the specific activities undertaken by the party, or alternatively, that the party had substantially complied with the statutory prerequisites, thereby resolving the dispute in favor of the opposing party based on the established legal construction.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 64 LTF; Statutory Interpretation of Professional Regulation: The court affirmed the lower court's judgment, reasoning that the plain language of the controlling statute and relevant precedent supported the conclusion that the regulatory framework did not apply to the specific activities undertaken by the party, or alternatively, that the party had substantially complied with the statutory prerequisites, thereby resolving the dispute in favor of the opposing party based on the established legal construction.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
interprétation de l'arrêt condition légale pouvoir d'examen profession judiciaire décision-cadre application des lois

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Cited in the dispositive for ordering the payment of court fees.

Art. 64 LTF

Cited in the dispositive to rule on the request for legal aid.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



        

       

  

    

 !"

# $%&'(





))  



+ , ++ -- ++ + ,. - 





     !"# 

+ 

0/30!63,7)&&$*

!*  8/5/ /7,///9./ 00,/2///2.13//5,/ /5/:,/50)$,/!''$/4/ 0407/00*

$*  !(;/!''#1!$<$=.4/00// 3/ +>/ ///0,?,,13/&!@,"< :41/0//,/01('@,"<* //.,A0/00/ #@,"<.05,00!%@,"<*

,7/    3/A/ B/ 52C 8 D :4 40/ 5 4 

 0 :  ,7/ 0/ / 5 4   ,/*  0/ //57:453:440/53:44F5/:  / 5 :  43/ 5 0  3/   5 50*

:43/005<A5</05+>//3/5>0 4,*//.43//5 499/ 0/ 0A0*  40/  3/  / </ ,/ 52  9/:4:/9//G4FA00H*

5/500/44/9/53 ;/9/9/:440/53;9/*

,,//:0500/,//3/5>0*G  53/5?575<A/0705, //://7A0//99//H*



"!$%&"!''( $"# 

/5,//5F,/55//4/)(7 /0)/900///2)!0,7)&#=B   8 %6)*')D*  8   9/F0  :/0   ,   ,5  400!''$*

0// 50/0 5   != ;/ !''(* ,, F5/:0   ,7F /.40/5330</* 9/05 5,//*

0/3/:4//:0/ *

 /.  / 0 5/0  9/, 4//  )! 5,7 !''( :4 0/7/44/9/*

)$*   /  !% 5,7 !''(.  8   /9,0  /7

$)I!''(*

  )$7!''(.8 9/,0 /7,///9:5/ $)I!''(/0/33,/G/1H*

)6*   5/  00   /  ,5/ 5  )#3,7!''(*

$'3,7 !''( /  00 /,5/ 5 ,,/: 4   

:50. /7,///9A/1;A40 /*

)#*  ;//4?.4;50/ 1, /7*

+ - 

)*  ;0  ,5 / 3  ;/// ,50.    37   5/  3 B* #(    /  JA// ;///  !!3,7)&6)    !'#K*($*)/*/50 ,///3)!5,7)&=#    #)'D*

"!$%&"!''( 6"# 

!*  8 4/ !!  .  5/ /3 7 1  /  9/   50 :4 //  ,?,*    09  7//2./7554/37//0 /B "(%'"!''()!0,7!''(D*

  /70:40/1 ,50/0://009,0)#3,7!''(*

   0:.  /7 ,///9 5 4/37//0  5097/*

$*  0,, LM6''* ,/1<AB*=%  D*

 NNNNN

/  +-  +    

0//3/,7/3/A/!;/!''(/ /5,//50F,/K

,1<A0,, LM6''* K

3/A///:41J99/9001*

8/0AC +,3>.50/.++*><2 <0/.;A*

, /7,///9C

A99/2 ;/C  3/ 50/C     */ 8/A/ *3>   

"!$%&"!''( #"# 

5/9,?00,,/:0F5/*

 23.  A99/2C           

"!$%&"!''(