Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATA/68/2015 • CJ GE ATA/68/2015 Généré par l'IA

Promissory Note Endorsement Validity and Statute of Limitations

Numéro de cause ATA/68/2015
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appeal concerned a dispute over the validity of a debt claim arising from an agreement related to the transfer of business assets, where the appellant challenged the initial finding regarding the timing and effect of an endorsement on a promissory note. The court upheld the initial decision, reasoning that the relevant statutory provision dictated that an endorsement, irrespective of the date it was physically written, was only legally effective from the date it was legally perfected, thus confirming that the claim was time-barred at the time the action was initiated.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Promissory Note Endorsement Validity and Statute of Limitations: The court upheld the initial decision, reasoning that the relevant statutory provision dictated that an endorsement, irrespective of the date it was physically written, was only legally effective from the date it was legally perfected, thus confirming that the claim was time-barred at the time the action was initiated.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
billet à ordre délai de prescription endossement date de début du droit validité de la reconnaissance de dette validité du testament
Généré par l'IA
A/447/2007
Creditor v. Debtor: Promissory Note Validity Appeal
A/1393/2004
Promissory Note Validity and Consideration Dispute
A/3837/2007
Promissory Note Validity and Guarantee Enforceability
C/7917/2020
Appeal Regarding Validity of Instruments Labeled "Promissory Note Guaranteed" as Bills of Exchange
A/4227/2007
Promissory Note Validity and Guarantee Enforcement

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/3351/2014

### [ATA/68/2015](/apps/decis/fr/ata/show/1887355) du 14.01.2015 ( FORMA ) , ACCORDE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/ata/file/2015/0000/ATA_000068_2015_A_3351_2014.pdf)

* /