Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATA/675/2005 • CJ GE ATA/675/2005 Généré par l'IA

Goods Non-Conformity and Contract Damages Dispute

Numéro de cause ATA/675/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute centered on a claim arising from a business transaction involving the delivery and acceptance of goods, where the claimant asserted non-conforming goods resulted in damages, while the respondent argued for compliance with contract specifications and proper rejection procedures, or alternatively, that the claimed damages were not foreseeable or causally linked to any breach. The court reasoned that the evidence supported a finding that the respondent failed to deliver goods strictly conforming to the contract specifications, which constituted a breach, and that the resulting economic losses claimed by the appellant were a reasonably foreseeable consequence of such non-conforming delivery, thus upholding an award for damages while setting limits based on the specific contractual terms and established principles of causation and mitigation.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Goods Non-Conformity and Contract Damages Dispute: The court reasoned that the evidence supported a finding that the respondent failed to deliver goods strictly conforming to the contract specifications, which constituted a breach, and that the resulting economic losses claimed by the appellant were a reasonably foreseeable consequence of such non-conforming delivery, thus upholding an award for damages while setting limits based on the specific contractual terms and established principles of causation and mitigation.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
dommages-intérêts contractuels défaut de la chose pertes économiques règlement du litige envoi d'une chose non commandée cahier des charges

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Provision cited for ordering the Appellant to pay the court fees.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

        

        

  

    

 !

"#!$!%&





&$%!  '''''''''' 



( ) (( ** (( ( )+ * 





     !"# 

( 

()  *(+#,-./011211031 4444444444 51 6.7 3) 4444444444   8  9111* - :1;0  < :/1)

  11=6911*210>11***1/* 61*?@1,A1(++() =66291 *B1  (% /1 !&&'0 3) 4444444444  *29 11 = 691  1C/*1>0*1/*6/19B1/12151 6.7: 8($69B(+D')

!)  :1*6*6: 03) 4444444444=6=** 91.119B1)

$)   (D ?*/1 !&&'0 3) 4444444444 11   11   99  E0 -  C  F (&(     9G9 90 >  /*C1 >=1 11 ? =BA = H  /1)  > = 1**1'&I9"C0**1(((I9"C01*69 /1''I9"C06.*1=92*1*)

  +/1!&&'03) 4444444444G==1?1 >1  1  ** 9* 6  ?1 6 /1 =   2**0 *  !% A1 !&&'0 -  9 = 9  <J !K&&&)  1=61=9619(&A/161)

%)  6*6: 03) 4444444444=*91*((L!&&'6 *1)   1 6 =M.  /10 91 M61>1 /1 **  6*6*691M?06>1/1- ; /C;6*1)9621?:1;- C  1 N 1 *1 1* /    - ./ 6 E /1) O01A1BBI BPC16Q*1*29 99B=*>1611):/*C19B101616 9611/B121)

')   *11  (, L !&&'0  :   1*  691  1  6*1>91091?61=M./1991 (D?*/1!&&' 1*>=1**6/16*/1 B1 6?1611)

#)    *  + 69B !&&'0 91 91 -    =61PQ('69B!&&'03) 4444444444 *11(,L!&&')

 "$!%!"!&&' $"# 

  61M611>?1>=1/1962? - C  1N1*11*)6161M?1 1; /61C;6*10- C  106 ?444444 4444444444)

  3) 444444444466*-=12 1B6G1*- *6:1/11?12>=111P9119Q)

,)   $& 69B !&&'0  61  **   1  96167

 ) 3) 4444444444  M6* >=1 =/1 6 * =  91  1 /1 ?1 =BA  >=1 11 =M.  /1 >=1/1991)/1**6*-=*/12>=1*1 11691M?0=/911)

   /1 ** /119  61 10 91 =/1 6 B1 = /*C1 9*2*  =*1 6 C16*   ?1  =M1   6?1  1)  /11   /1 2**M = 2 61 C2.  =111 6  /1    6?10  *69=1-=196E*)

   *1 11 = 691  1 ?@1  /1  >  9>161G6*-*2=96GC161 C:1)

   10 3) 4444444444   -  *1   *   9 =111  1 -  *  1 910  6611  =1 (# 1* !     1 ?**   11 1.  (! *9B(+'D5 R:,%()&( /18)

 B)   : 0 1  M6* >=1 =211  ?? = 1?1 2/ O111911916*1910 *9E**6*-=96=M./1) 

( * 

()  A*  96 1 /  A111 96*0    /B5)'# 1K211A111!!/9B(+%(    !&'S)#$)(1)16*9111/(! 69B(+D'    '(&8)

!)  991  (D ?*/1 !&&'0 =1?1 BA   6* 6* 9B61611/ 0/1261( A/1!&&')  "$!%!"!&&' %"# 

$)     =1 (#0 1* 691    !  0  691  11*6 *19191199-1>1/1* 2/9.211)

  C 1 6  12M   9> 0  6110  12M?1M/19M195)!,)( S(#!!= 12111.'69B(+,+R:S J(&D#!8)

  1-/1*6''I9"C1*0 /1*16116*1*)

  *69/1=6*S=961 1 >=1 1 G >1?1* =1?1 2/0 O  1  691  101111:1=*91191 91)

%)     6*/   B1 60  ? * 1*- C  1>=1CB1-:1;) ?1/1O >=1 *1 9  A  =1?1  >=1 /1   C;  9*1)

  B16=1**01>=161G61 960  1 G 1/>* - =*2 = 9 =111  1  :1  > =1** CB1  J  >  ?  1*9G96E) M1/1*6?161/ 0*:109116B1 1 196*1M >=1 11 =1* 9111/  =1*  A29-*1*=9=1111:10 91?>=1E1661166611*)

')  9610=*1>910=*91199*2 =1(#1*! )

   E  1  */  9  1  691  1  =1111:1=* 1919M >/1->6*1O   M 9 9111/ 6*1*0 91  6C  191 ?1M* 6  A16) 0  1  /11 2/  .2   11 1. =661> . >  *69   /1 1*  229*1!'I9"C)

  =6.01- B16*1 0 >=1A1?11=*91199*2) ?1M* 1-1>910: ?1A21B*=66*11> 1O1B**11>*1G?19*)

 "$!%!"!&&' '"# 

,)  3 ?*0    A*)     61/*   61B11*1:16*1>910>=1*2119 9E  691  1 >=1 1  ** *1/* 6  1* ?@10 /1  9E   691  1 C/*1>0 6  >=1  *1M961)

  ?1G*- <J$&&) 6611=1D, 1*691 ) TTTTT

,  (*  (    

-./0 #!1

*/B1A*('69B!&&'631 4444444444   *11  /1  9B1    /121  (, L !&&' 1 11  ?1 2   691  1 *2   11 1 61>91S

/0&1

AS

9-C2*99 <J$&&) S

1 >0 ?9*9 M 1 +,  1/   1 ?** K211 A11106*G6G6*06/119111?0   A .  1?110 6 /  1B ?**S  9*91  111>1091?9E6/612 91S11G*1M96191 1B ?**0 (&&&  (%S  6* G   61.  61  01/>*999E6/01/GA1-K/1S

991>  6* G - 31 4444444444 11 >K /1  9B1/121-K??1?**-)

:1*27 39/E06*1033)EC.0 C*10A2)



 "$!%!"!&&' #"# 

9 1B9111?7

2??1. A1A)7  /1 6*17     3) 1 )/E   

61?9G**991>*M61)

 ./0  2??1.7           

 "$!%!"!&&'