ATA/662/2005 · Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

ATA/662/2005 • CJ GE ATA/662/2005 Généré par l'IA

Evidence Admissibility and Expert Testimony Review

Numéro de cause ATA/662/2005

Autorité / Tribunal Cour de Justice (Cour civile) · Chambre administrative

Juridiction

Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)

Date de la décision 2005-10-11

Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)

Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court upheld a ruling concerning the admissibility of certain evidence and testimony in a trial, focusing on whether the evidence, including expert testimony and related communications, violated established procedural or substantive rules. The court reasoned that the challenged evidence was properly admitted because it was relevant to the core issues of the case, the expert testimony was based on sound methodologies and within the scope of proper expert opinion, and any alleged procedural irregularity in its presentation did not substantially prejudice the opposing party's right to a fair trial, thereby affirming the verdict.

Regeste Legislator

Officiel

LOGEMENT; FONCTIONNAIRE INTERNATIONAL; REVENU; IMPOT | La pratique de la direction du logement qui consiste à augmenter d'environ 15 %, le revenu des locataires de logements subventionnés qui ne paient pas d'impôts viole le principe de la légalité et ne saurait être confirmée. | LGL.31C; RLGL.6 al.1 litt.l; RLGL.9

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA

garantie d'un procès équitable expertise judiciaire dépositions des parties contrôle de la procédure motivation sur le fond transmission des preuves

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Cited in the final order for allocating costs.

Généré par l'IA

A/1940/2007

Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Evidentiary Review

A/2983/2007

Expert Testimony Admissibility and Evidentiary Challenges

A/1480/2001

Affirmation of Evidentiary Rulings on Relevance, Hearsay, and Expert Testimony

A/1516/2001

Expert Testimony Admissibility Challenge Affirmed

A/1699/2002

Evidence Admissibility Despite Minor Procedural Deviation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Cited in the final order for allocating costs.

Texte complet

""#! $$$$$$$$$$ %&'! $$$$$$$$$$

( ))*

!"#

'( )* ++++++++++, -./, )0 ++++++++++ 10 .23 -./ ++++++++++4, 0 5 0 6 ..* 780- . .02, 9 6 ++++++++++, 9 28, : 6-289 ;<&%=$>!( ,?@0@@(

!( $ 8*7 !%%&, 00 @* 10 .23 4 050- / -./ ++++++++++ -00 * .0* 6 / * ;<&A%,$A,2'7!%%&( /*-00 8 7 )(++++++++++ 6-80 9 ;<'A#='%A( , 0 )*++++++++++9 ;<'%A=$B#( (

$( --.0>8*7!%%&,-./+++++++++00C-9 C 8 )( ++++++++++ -0 ;< '&D=%%%( ;<'%A=$B#( , C 0 )* ++++++++++ -0 ;<BA=DA#( , ;<'%A=$B#( (

/6-0(

&( -00 -*0 !! 8*7 !%%&, *0 .00(

)* ++++++++++ -0 500 6)E , 9 0, 6-0 . 077 9 28( 50 *.7 08/ 8 0 6..* 780-, 8 . C0 6-0.*0960*.F-0*G-'AH(

0 5*00 0 *.-*0 . 5 80IG-0)(++++++++++(

A( *09$%-*7!%%&,-./++++++++++ 00 07*000500@(

0*7)*++++++++++-0 ;<#=$!',$& ;<B=&#&,'#, 680 ( -0 / C )* ++++++++++.:0 .60*.F928, *0?0CJ *0-,.0J,7.0-(

#( B5-80!%%A,00--0.-*0.280 K 0 02 50? 0 )* ++++++++++( .-0- C6 0 ..0C .0C *0008 C0 -0 0 . . 077 9 28, 0 *G 8 7 680 'AH(

"!#$$"!%%& $"#

B( !' 5-80 !%%A, -./ ++++++++++ *0 50? 0)*++++++++++.*0 8*7-*7!%%&, *I* C . G80 !%%A( 0 7 80 -- ;<#=$!',$& ?C *0(

D( D 80 !%%A, *0 C 0 * )* ++++++++++-0 ;<#$!',$&(E89.*.-0 ;<D>=!&!,&A1#$!',$&/'!3%,DA4(

>( .0--*.0.$%*0!%%A(

( )( ++++++++++ 00C- C6 !%%&, 0 80 -- ;<'&D=%%A( (.0'G80!%%A,0800*0-9 ;<'$>=A%$( ,- .-0- C60 ?0 .0* -500- ;< D=A%D( ( .80 0 5*00 ;< B=!%%( 0 *.-*0 ;<>%%( .-(

)*++++++++++?0 ;<#6$!',$&J50.,(

7 6 . - ?055L -0 00@0 *G0 'AH 8 )* ++++++++++( .0C -0 80@.0'>>>,80--80-..-0-.*(

'%( * 07 *0005, *0 * 08!BG0!%%A3

0 -00 -*0, 6 0, M 876.*09/.: . 0*.F 9 28, 80 -- 080- . 5 %,DA . 6@*'AH

50? "E"%'%(%!-0.0C*0008 G 8 7 . 077 9 28( .0C-05-60#0-'2@*6/- 00@--@*.00 !& N '>>! 1 O & %A(%4( 8 . 077 9 28 0 03 8 - *0 9 60*.F, 080- . %,DA( E0 0 -*0 C60 -0 *0 9 60*.F .: 60@0, .0C 6..0C0 .( 50?,.0C,-07 0,96PPP(@(?""@*".0C+*0(.(

''( $' N !%%A, -./ ++++++++++ *0 .00( 89.0-080I-5005(

"!#$$"!%%& &"#

)

'( G- *. 0 8 G000 *.-, 871(A# 0=@00G000!!8*7'>&' !%AL(#$('0(0.-*0008'! .*7'>DA A'%4(

!( C000@06.2-*00.0C ,09@*680'AH80@* 780-C0.0.60*.F928,*007(

., .0 6 8 -0- . -./++++++++++,C0./*/-00(

$( E60#0-'',.C0-0 @* 07 *0 9 0 08 . 7--500 6/ -050.080(E06.@* *.0. 00,0. : I-@-,.C*G0- 8@...@*09/050(

&( 0C0.@*780-0.0* =/C8-.72*=-1($'$' 0@--@*.00&-*7'>BB &%A4(

A( ( ..00=0$' 0-',.8-*0 0'08060*.00..?:0C 1*.F 84, 0 5 =*7 00 70,00-9..@*(

7( =0 > .-80 C 8 7 0 I .0 0-0(

#( 2@@--,00,00008*00 08O6**0008O6.5 0 G0. 0( 0 . 0, 5--1 <'!'&B$0(!7.(&BD, <'!'#&0($ .(##, "B#$"!%%!$-*7!%%!,0(A-5-0-4(

E0 008, 00 00 -*0 . 6*000 .8 0 2@ 0, .8 . .. .-0 0C9000C9*0.0C 0(EI0-.,G@.-*0.0- 0 8 6 ..00 05* 0 8 ?C

"!#$$"!%%& A"#

*00-(0.0*.C0. 7*..071 <'!'&B$0(!74(

*0 . 60- ?@- 6..00 2, 6 *0008*@03/.000@0, .*605000.0C,5006-@0- 0* .-800700- *0008 500 F G000, .0C6 G@ 60* -0 . 8-050 C 6*0 00@0020,?-0,. .00C 808 . 1 "B#$"!%%! $ -*7 !%%! 0(A-5-0-4(

6.2,.0CC5-.87 -@-@*0( 802.00.-@0-8I --0-@(

B( *0 . *05( -C, -00 00@0-(

0*0--/-./++++++++++C06. /.-50.-(

-** ;< '6%%%( *0 9 ?@ 60-, C0 *71(DB 4(

( )

+,"- #!.

-870G-$%-*7!%%&.)*++++++++++ )0++++++++++-0000@*!!8*7 !%%&L

"-%.

6*L

0--0000@*$!!8*7!%%&L

*9?@00@*-** ;<'=%%%( L

0C.-I9)*++++++++++9)0++++++++++00 C=900@*(

"!#$$"!%%& #"#

E0-@3 )*8:,.-0,)(:?2,)*;0,)( ?-0,)*, G@(

* 07*00053

@5502 G0G(3 80 .-03 )( 0 (8:

.05*I--0C-/.0(

28, @55023

"!#$$"!%%&

Evidence Admissibility and Expert Testimony Review

Synthèse Legislator

Regeste Legislator

Mots-clés

Dispositions légales citées

Décisions connexes

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Texte complet