Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATA/633/2005 • CJ GE ATA/633/2005 Généré par l'IA

Statute's Equal Protection Challenge Based on Classification of Governmental Entities

Numéro de cause ATA/633/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute concerned the validity of a specific section of a statute, with the central issue being whether that section was facially unconstitutional because it applied only to certain governmental entities, thereby failing to provide equal protection under the law. The court reasoned that the classification created by the statute, distinguishing between governmental entities, was not rationally related to a legitimate state interest, as the statutory distinction served no discernible purpose beyond the differential treatment of similarly situated entities, and thus the law violated the equal protection guarantees of the state constitution.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Statute's Equal Protection Challenge Based on Classification of Governmental Entities: The court reasoned that the classification created by the statute, distinguishing between governmental entities, was not rationally related to a legitimate state interest, as the statutory distinction served no discernible purpose beyond the differential treatment of similarly situated entities, and thus the law violated the equal protection guarantees of the state constitution.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
égalité de traitement constitution protection de l'État statut en droit international privé égalité en matière de droit de vote discrimination raciale

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied to determine the costs of the federal procedure.
Généré par l'IA
A/2420/2007
Statutory Interpretation and Equal Protection Challenge
A/2800/2005
Property Transfer Statute Constitutionality Challenge
A/1538/2002
Tax Entity Classification and Assessment Dispute
A/1480/2006
Property Tax Assessment Validity and Constitutional Challenge
A/798/2006
Tax Interest Disparity Equal Protection Challenge

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied to determine the costs of the federal procedure.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

        

       

  

   

 !"#





 $$! %%%%%%%%%%  !"#$$$$$$$$$$%"&#  " 

   





     '()*'

& 

-/   0    -1 2#  (,,.% 3# 3  #  + "4  (,,.%  #5 6##  #&  2   " # 2   !6 $$$$$$$$$$%    !"# $$$$$$$$$$ 7#'89 !6 $$$$$$$$$$ "  6 :# #;""  #8< =#>  /

  6"6  ?@.,,/' 6#<=;!6$$$$$$$$$$/

(/      (1 "4  (,,.% 6#  606 2" <    > #  " % !6 $$$$$$$$$$  A  6 #" "  >6"6  B# # A#    #&#;/  C A"#   A#" #"   #  #"  #& 3 "#  #A#   "# #B 7 D E ,/-,+/(:%  A#;"E#-F 65-11(%##B #F%1  +* " #  #"& "& #"#-FA#-1117  /' E-,-:/ &#%# #B;6 8;6 &#%6"6   #6#   6 #8 6##  #A  +, 2#  -1FG B#  " #   >3 #"## 8"3"6 #8"#  "# #B/

   # 5###%6 &# "A"#B> 3" A   #"  ";66  A##"    #"D  #  #" &##8# ##&"# /

+/   -1  65 (,,.%  6     #&"6 B    #  ;<2;/

&  

-/   > #FH#*"#"6##  #A -(  65 -1F. 7  '  . -,:%  #5 6##  #&      6 #"C  # 3&#"%6"6  #6# 0   2## #"/ 6 #""# 0 "+,2"8 " #&# #""" #/

   >8%  6  " #  A"#  #  # "    3# #">0 # ; A#(12# (,,.%"B# "   >0   -1 2#  (,,.    3#  #6 % "#   + "4  (,,.%< "#/

  6 #" A5/

)+,-.)(,,. '+)*'

(/  ## B  6   "8 '606% #   % #  " #  #" & >#6"  3  "  ; #   6 #8  " I 2###" #" "/

   5 ; "  8A6  > 6"6    " #   > #FH # /E"0 "6 #6 % #B>#  #  #'606  # <  # "%   8 "3  "2< "##" 7&/" / )((.)(,,. -1A#(,,.  )-(-)(,,((G&A#(,,(:/

+/  E>;#    &#3 #"      #6# %  2## #" ## #" > 8 ; "A"# ># #"% B# >  #6#  B  ># # #">5# #7 ).H1)(,,+(+2# (,,+  )--*)(,,( (G&A#(,,(:/

  8;6 # #B6 %#>C>3 #" ##  #6   &#   "    # B# "65  6 #8  "#  "# #B/  #% > # (   8;6  &#3  63#66  >6"6  < ?@-,J,,,/'% A"# < ?@-.J,,,/'   "   #" ##"  #&&#  ##8/

 ># A #  #"&##8#"6  #">6"6 / "< ;"#> B##   6#  >"; # >#6   A   #"  ";66  #"    A##"% " B    3" #  A< #-2A#(,,*/  #8> &&# "  5#  6    6 / '# >3"   #  #"  6#8&&#66 "68 "B>#0 #"# #"  #5  /  #  #" &##8 > 2 ##5 >     # 8&#3 #">6"6 / 6"6;#  #   ## B  >65   2## #" < >#  #" > "#    2;6 " #   # 8/

 %  >8% >&&# A#  " 66  " # <  #  "6 #"" #/" &"A# " " #8""A; #"%B>#& 36#A"#B> B# / 8 "%  "" > 6"6  0  < ?@.,,/' "#  <  A#; #86  63#66  #&  ?@-,J,,,/'   <   #86  63#66 5" ?@-.J,,,/'  86"  =< " # #B">;  >5# #/ &#% #  >C  #   #6 &"%  6  #   B#5&#># 2##B/

*/  "B% 6 #"2 /E" %B#"65%  " &"#  "6 <  6"6  "    "

7 ).F()(,,.+,"4 (,,.:/

)+,-.)(,,. '*)*'

KKKKK

  &  &   

'($)*#!+

 A5  6 #"  (1 "4  (,,.  !6 $$$$$$$$$$ "  >0  #56##  #&-12# (,,.D

$)*,9

2 D

# BJ#J LJ6"6 D

"66#B    0  < !6 $$$$$$$$$$    !"# $$$$$$$$$$%"&#  #5&"#&"6 #"7/.11)(,,.:/

E#; 9 !6"AC%# %!/C=8%!6?#%!/ =#%!6"% 2;/

"6 #56##  #&9

;&&#8'2# 2/9  A#'# 9     !/ ""# /"AC  

"#"&"6 0  "66#B3 #/

 8A%  ;&&#89         

)+,-.)(,,.