Contract Damages Calculation Dispute Affirmation
Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAA litigant challenged a calculation of damages related to a contract dispute, arguing that the trial court erred by applying a standard that resulted in a lower award than they believed they were entitled to under the contract's terms, particularly concerning certain interest or penalty provisions dependent on specific contractual breaches or timing. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, reasoning that the trial court correctly interpreted the applicable contractual clauses and relevant case law, finding that the factual predicates necessary to trigger the higher damage calculations asserted by the appellant were not met, thereby upholding the damage amount calculated based on the breach that was successfully proven.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contract Damages Calculation Dispute Affirmation: The appellate court affirmed the judgment, reasoning that the trial court correctly interpreted the applicable contractual clauses and relevant case law, finding that the factual predicates necessary to trigger the higher damage calculations asserted by the appellant were not met, thereby upholding the damage amount calculated based on the breach that was successfully proven.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe court ordered the appellant to pay the procedural costs.
Texte complet
! "##$%
& '$(($%& &)$*&"(
+ +++
+++
!"#
)** +,-*) . * / 0*11** !&2*!''#+
324 5 676 6 8 9) * - *:
-3/ *- , 8 9) /;** * ,* 4 , *+ 11 *1* * < /2* * /= ) ) > :
0 %'2*!''#+ 8,) ) ?2* 8@8 ) +* 2 ), / , * 6.676 6A* , <B/ , * 3 , )- 8 5 * * / 11 , *1:
0 ), 11 , *1 * <0 + ( 2* !''#+ * ; +/4* 8 9) *+ 676 60* , * 11 8 8 * ) ; / , * A C. $#D6 5 C. $(D6 ,*< , * /**) * + C. $&'6E5 C. #?D6 ,*< 11 C. $('6 5 C. ?''6 ,*< , * /*98 * + C. DDD6 5 C.%/%''6 ,*< , F , , ) , 3+ /4* * ,* 4 *+ *< /0* , 8,* 9* 9 4 + 88 , ;*) * * ,* 4 :
B
; )** , ) 8 ;) 8* 5 G * 8 9) ,-* !D 0 8- $((#+ ) 0*4 , <0 ( ) 8- $((?A H I'D3:
;G* 2 ) 8, * 0 2 ** * 8,) + 8- +5 , 8*< 0 + 0- , * 0 A 6$D H+ 6%6$ ! 6 * * *G 59) 5G * 8 9),-*$! 2*$((? H I6'D6'3:
; G ,G 11 , *1A 6$?6$ H3:
; 1 *+ G * ) , + G 11* 8 + G 11 , *1 5 , ; * * , * 11*88 1 ) ;G * ) @ ,-* , *0), ), ) G= ,, A 6$?6! H3+ 1 8 * G*,* G * II*)! * , ) 8** *0 $! , 8- $(&DA D$':)** 676 6%'8 !''$3:
;G* ) * / F8* * , ) , * J11*88 1 )JA 6$?6! H3:
; / , * 1* 0 * +/4* 8 9)/;** * *+;/ 8,4* 4 0 * ; * 8 9) 0* ,*@ *-)+ * * , 8 * ), * - :
"$%&#"!''# "$%(!"!''# %"#
;/ ;* 8 9) *15/;** * ,* 4 + 0) ;/ 1 ** * <0 5 * F*1 ,* 8- ) +; 9* 9 4 8;* , )** ) ;/ 8, * , )** ;*0* ) ), * :
;/** 0 + 8 9) *+; *, * * )* ) , G H0* 5, )4 G* ) @ ,-* , , **, G *- * +, )*)8 , ; , )1) ; 8- 4 *, * :
; + * + 8 9) */ ,+ , *81* +11*88 1 ), ; *-* * / 11 , *1:
; 8 9) ,* 4 /= ,) ) *-)+/ 11 , *1 , @ * ) 5 )** 5 )4 *1 A 6 7 + * ) * 8** *1+ 9K $(&#+ ,6 (!%: .6 L+ JG 11 , *1 8 , 0** , ) 8** *0 J+ * B . $(?I+ ,6 !!$ !!D: 6 M + )* * 8** *1+#<8 )6+K . 1 "H*$(($+,6!#!N$'?(3:
; 0 /* ;@ * * / 11 , *1+ , ) )** , @ ;/ 676 6/* / * ) 8* *A 6 ?! 3:
; 1 * 2 * ) 0)2;G5 * 24)1 :
0 G * II *) ! * , ) 8** *0 $! , 8- $(&D:
0G * D <4 8 *-8** *1%' O $((#:
, "-$ '.&" $*%$ '"/ *,#, 0"*"&%',%"(
2 8 * * / 11 , *1F :
) 0 1 * 2 * 2;/5 * 24)1 :
88*; , ) )** + ,* +56.676 6**;G5* <0 5/ , * 676 65 8P 6
"$%&#"!''# "$%(!"!''# #"#
* )* *- 8** *1B 6 0=
,* 1 8 )** ) ) 88*;) F, * 6
<0 + 4 11*< B
"$%&#"!''# "$%(!"!''#