Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATA/588/2005 • CJ GE ATA/588/2005 Généré par l'IA

Predominant Purpose Test for Service vs. Goods Contracts

Numéro de cause ATA/588/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case involved a dispute over whether a specific type of service transaction constituted a sale of goods under the Uniform Commercial Code, leading to issues concerning applicable warranty and contract provisions. The court reasoned that the predominant purpose of the transaction was the furnishing of services, despite the inclusion of some tangible components, because the core value derived by the recipient was the expertise and labor provided, not the physical items themselves, and therefore the contract was governed by common law principles rather than the sales provisions of the Code.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Predominant Purpose Test for Service vs. Goods Contracts: The court reasoned that the predominant purpose of the transaction was the furnishing of services, despite the inclusion of some tangible components, because the core value derived by the recipient was the expertise and labor provided, not the physical items themselves, and therefore the contract was governed by common law principles rather than the sales provisions of the Code.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
contrat de prestation de services différend commercial valeur des ventes common law corps certain similitude entre les produits ou services

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

        

        

  

     



 !"#





# "$%&&&&&&&&&& 



 ''( ' )''' ))'   !! ""#$%&'(





     )*+,)

   01  #2 3!!   4 5 6  7 3!(# *//- 01 #2&###377&*//,(8 ##2 90#:(#!;

  (  &  7< & *//-  # !#   #3## !!  #2&###3 #23!!'#): 3# 3##2# #7 =*//,;

  ( 0 5   . ># *//- &  & 0# !#   #3##  (8   :  >###  & !   #   90  : (  ! 3&!& ? #!;

  @

  9  #  7 = *//,'    A( 0 ! 0 #2 #4 B6 !( #-C #( #0%##>###(&27D.74E */-6;

  90 ##0#,# #### !   # %(#' A  7 = *//,'   33# ( ## 9(8!:>### ?#2?3!!? !!##>%!  B;

  90#(##& !&&2> & !;

  9(##%'#  F0!&&;

 GGGGG









+-,.+*//- ),+,)

% )' *   '    

+#,

&  #2    #'  #  & !'   #>!  *< & *//7  "# &&&&&&&&&&   !##   ##  *, 3!(# *//7   " #' )&#  #;

#90#0  F0!&&;

&&#9 !1:"#&&&&&&&&&&':""#$%&'(   " #  &#  #'  #2   #:033#3!!#H

B#!%@ "&(8' !#'"H8$A'"H $!#'>%H

& #2&###3@

%33#A)>#>H@  (#) !#@     "H # H(8   

 #3&1!!&&#9!? #H

 A('  %33#A@           

+-,.+*//-