Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATA/566/2007 • CJ GE ATA/566/2007 Généré par l'IA

Secured Party's Discretion in Payment Application Upheld

Numéro de cause ATA/566/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The situation involved a dispute over the payment of an obligation secured by an instrument, where the obligor claimed that the secured party had improperly applied payments. The court reasoned that the evidence supported the finding that the secured party acted within its rights in allocating the payments because the underlying agreement provided the secured party with discretion over the application of partial payments, and the obligor failed to timely and adequately protest that application or prove any wrongful conduct in that allocation.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Secured Party's Discretion in Payment Application Upheld: The court reasoned that the evidence supported the finding that the secured party acted within its rights in allocating the payments because the underlying agreement provided the secured party with discretion over the application of partial payments, and the obligor failed to timely and adequately protest that application or prove any wrongful conduct in that allocation.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
assignation demande partielle prétention en poursuite validité du contrat paiement de l'amende objet du litige

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied to order the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
C/15645/2014
Enforcement of Payment Order Upheld Despite Delay and Defect Claims
A/672/2005
Enforcement of Stipulated Judgment Despite Subsequent Payment Agreement
A/3653/2006
Contractual Payment Obligation Dispute
C/22156/2013
Payment Order Enforcement Following Settlement Agreement Interpretation
C/8671/2003
Financial Instruments Payment Obligation Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied to order the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



         

       

 



    

 !"#$%" 

&%"''"(&&)"&*' 





 &*"%+++++++ 



 ,   ,- 



     !"# 

 )**+*!,+-.!''(+/*-.* /*0* 1* +23 4 5 6* *** +  ) *)-*) 7 8*99999996*0+-**)0+-*  * **   ** *: ;)<0   +-*  * )0 /  +-*  * * ) 6): ;*))  ;) + +))7=+)/#,>*!''(?

 /2@)*)**:.?

 /   *>) + 8A 9999999  ,$ . !''(:  - B * *7*+).7**;66+*6?

 /)-**4 &/-.!''(:B;*)**-) ;++7**:B*/**)**B)?

*3

 B  ;* CC *) ,   *   +) -***/  ,!+-.,$D&1   &,'5:66+*6?

 B;7-E-*+**:;*)+-*2*+* ;66+*6?

 B6*:B;*)E+.*+*/)+)+);F++: >***+:-+**)E0/- -):*;66+*61ACCA! 5?

 B;*%%*),;)0;-**+   /)<* 7  ** *2  !( . ,$(C 1   4 (%,A&,5:  **;+-**)0/./+-***+  -E- )0*  /)<* ;* ++  +/:  ;   =: B;* G  20   **  B;*  7 -E-  * ; 6H I/)<*)0*+B+-*/*E/.?

 B    ; + +)) 7    = 7 B * )* /B)#,>*!''(?

 B;*)*6**7BE7**;66+*6:* .**  6*  +*   *  6:   B  -  +B;E>);;*;****0?





"#$%&"!''( #"# 

       

>-**J66+*6?

)/6*>B;7*>0)6?

* B: 6-)- @ * D!  */   * 6))   *. 6)),(>*!''&1 K 4,(#A,,'5:+))**+E+) >B**/*6**+ / *.6)):+/* -*2*+.*?-)-****B*: -*6-F+/+*0-*?* * E )  *. 6)): ,'''  ,%: + /* +  + /* )*B @ **  J* %!  KA  +) )**   +*2  +*  : */B) -- -F  +/: */ E >* 7 J/*?

--*B  +) )**:  +*: 7 8* 9999999 ** BJ /* -.*/*0*A

  +)* *.-***63     KAF<2 

+*6-)**))--*B)@+*A

 2/:  066*23         

"#$%&"!''(