Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATA/559/2007 • CJ GE ATA/559/2007 Généré par l'IA

Expert Testimony Admissibility and Evidentiary Challenges

Numéro de cause ATA/559/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party challenged the admissibility of evidence used in a civil trial, arguing the lower court improperly denied their motion to exclude expert testimony and related exhibits because the underlying testing was allegedly unreliable and conducted in violation of established protocols. The court reasoned that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the evidence, finding that the challenging party failed to timely raise the specific objections concerning protocol violations, and furthermore, the expert testimony was supported by adequate foundation evidence, thereby satisfying the requirements for admissibility.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Expert Testimony Admissibility and Evidentiary Challenges: The court reasoned that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the evidence, finding that the challenging party failed to timely raise the specific objections concerning protocol violations, and furthermore, the expert testimony was supported by adequate foundation evidence, thereby satisfying the requirements for admissibility.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
exigences de preuve dépositions des parties moyens de preuve inattendibles témoin-expert moyens de preuve tardifs transmission de preuves

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied for the allocation of court costs.
Généré par l'IA
A/1516/2001
Expert Testimony Admissibility Challenge Affirmed
A/1871/2006
Expert Testimony Admissibility Challenge
A/2633/2004
Evidence Admissibility and Expert Testimony Review
A/1940/2007
Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Evidentiary Review
A/1552/2003
Admissibility of Expert Financial Testimony Upheld

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied for the allocation of court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



        

       

  

    

 

!" # $%





%#$ &''''''''  !" #$%&&'(% 

% 

( ) (( && (( ( )* & 





     ")*+"

( 

01  !%233333333'0,45' %&22267(1%8 % &2%20)9(20,-01

)1  $%  %2  (2   %&%82     (2: 2% ;2"7< $ ='( 2&  6!133333333)-%(&8)//4 2%>?7(2 1

.1 1 ).9(2)//+'6/4#@,'!13333333322 (%2 %  AB2 2%(2&C&%& (2  %2 05D&*#'&:2 2 1

 81  C   )4 &2 )//+'  $    2  &2  %2  !133333333 &%2'2 2%> 205%2E   2 2% % 27  0, &8 0,4- ;  " $ +@01/0=1   22% E22 2( ? %2'&2( C %04&8 )//+1

@1 1 ),&2)//+'6/)#0/'!133333333E2 >%89 >% F% G>2 E#22   (%2   % 2  #(""%:21    %2%' 2 >  ( G>2  2      >2(' >B  % : B  ( ?>%%&%B0')):1%*%%1

  $%&2 22""#&:&2(%2'  &2 $ 1

 81 @92)//+'!133333333 2   6%B2  (%    (%2 1 %  E%&2  >:' 2    ? :"

E% 272&2%2'G>2(2 2:%&&  1

 1    2% ? :&' >2   22G G % 2' >2 2 2%% 2E22 >%89 (2 2E2./&2)//+'%2 &2 % FEE :&(%21 2 #EE ?2 >(2  9&2 (21

  $%2&2%2 22""#& (%B$ 1

41   00 92 )//+'  $    2  % &2 6 !1 33333333 6 2  %(2%21

51   C   0- 92  )//5'  $    2  &2  %2  !133333333   2? &%2' %  2%    96 82'  2 2%  > 2 05   %2 E   2 2% % 27  0,

*),-.*)//+ ".*+"

&80,4-; "$+@01/0=1%E2?G% 2 &'$   %&   >&8  2% ' 6 (%2   %2      >82 ),&2)//+ % 2 @92)//+1

  $>:2    2  > &%2 %%  )4 &2 )//+' > %2    % >? 2%6E2%(&1

+1  )%H )//5'!13333333322 28&22  2E>% % I(2% 2%  %2    8  %(%2 >2 2%   & J1  >2%%'2?%G>2?K2 %E2%#EE ?2  G>2 2 8E2> %E2%20,9(20,,,1  2   &2 2   %G   %#2G % 21  (2   EE  >%8 2 > %2 2% >?%2   (2  ?2 82   G2 2   %  &%     ? 2G' 6 (%2 LA ./M///1"'  %&  &1$>2(2 C 2(%&2'2%2  % 2&&  ?%& 2 > %2 2%G 2%2 (%G1

  !1 33333333  % %#  $  >(%2 (2% % %2  >C         2 (%2  % &2  &1  '  22%2 2:2(2%2 > 25 %( 2%(:%2  M#%&& 28 E%& @%(&80,4/; L"$/10/0=1

  E2'  %  %  6  &2 6     22% 2 2:21     2  (2  C  & 6 ? &%2   >    7( %& ? ' G (2  %&  2&2  6 2    22 2% ?#%%2>(% 1

-1    2 %       %& 2% %  0+  &8 )//+1

 1 !133333333%E2&%%'?% G22%)4&2 )//+2 2 %&2%2 &%2>(2  E  %   G>2 (2  (  % % &2  04 &8 )//+1 $>:2 >2((% ),&2)//+'222 E2 G>2> 2    (2' G>2 (2  8 ? 827   G      >B  : > %2 1   % 2 G' %EE  > #2 2' 2 2    2"2E&& %2 '%2&%  'I 2 # > 8  %#   &%#2J1  >(2   2:  E%&2  22 %(2%2  &2  %2'  2 > 2   > C  2(1  (2  % E%2K%22 E%&21

   :& 2 (2   G>2 %2   % &2  %2$  % 2(2 #EE ?27&21

  %G>2 (2    2  6  %  B2' 2  2  &2  % 2 &2  %2 G>2 (2   %(  " &1  (2  22G ?

*),-.*)//+ "@*+"

%2 G>2  2  2&&2 &   $  %   %( &21

 81   $ (G& 2  2%&2 (2   E2  2 1 > %2  (2  %&&2       22%%2% %%2%8( 2%'% &C& G % (%  > 2   &2   1  % (   28&22  2E(2 &%2&2 (2% 2%%2  >C  1 '$ 2 22% 21

,1  $G%2' :69:1

( & 

01   9   &  2 (   922 2% %&  '  %   (8; 145 %2M%:2 2%9222))%(&80,@0" " )/4N 15.10 1%2%&22  2(0)  &80,-4" " 40/=1

)1  % %#$ >(%2(2%%%2 >C  1

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

 81 M7'(2% 2%%2 MC  '& &2 $ '     (   28 &22  2E'  %  G  :2E   1

.1 1 2%G 28%2%  M8 2%2(#2 ; 1 .0 1 )  =1   % &&    2  8%2% 2 %  

*),-.*)//+ "4*+"

%  2%M%%: 2 %/'-:1%*%%%7: (2:( .0&8)//.; 14410 N 1.-M%% : M&22%% (#262 2%% 27)+ % %80,+5" "$+@0140N!1 '2(  2 &2 %2'0,-)'10@5% 10@,=1

 81    > 2 05 2 0   8  '  %2  > (#2  %&%82     >82     E  :( %    G >2     ? >%%   : G2E2    >%%  > &8 E %   ? >%%&2 2&2  &2  & 27 2 2%% 27)0&8)//.;$+@010.=1  > 20 2)2 %%'  G2E2 ?>%%&2/'-:1 %*%%%1

 1 %2 ),&2)//+( ?>%%:0')):1 %*%%'!133333333%&&2E :(1

@1 1 $% > 2 .- 2 0     >%% :  M&22%  % (#262 2%% 27)+% %80,+5; "$ +@0140='&2%2%2 C 22""#&%2%G %  &2E & 28%2%%  ?>%% :/'-:1%*%% &2 #B%&7 1> 2., 2G  %2 %E2&  2   22  &2  %2   22G  % %G: &1

 81 :&2(%2% &27%G>2  % ),&2)//+1E2 G2"22 E2:E%&2  22 %(2%2  #: 2 6 >EE2'  >   G>2  2"&C& '%%& 2%%'G>2(2 :2222> 2  >C 2(%&21

   2 %  ( G  E%&2 G2 2    &2 2 G' 9G>6G> %2 %&  2   '22%(2%2&2 &C&EE G>22% 2  2 2 6>2 %2  %  (#2 %&%82'B%&% %&21

 1 (G27'> (2G% % 2 G>2> 2   %  2  %  % 2  2%  @ 92 )//+1  %2  % (#2  9%"6' % G % &2  %2 (2    22' 2  2 %&&2E :(> 20520 E 1

41  $% > 2 05 2 )   8  '  &2  %2 %2  C   2%2%2?&%2&22&&'72E 2%:(2' %2G &2  2E%22%> 2E 2%&%B& :(1

*),-.*)//+ "5*+"

  >7'% %&&2?2E 2%:('%2 2( (% '2%2 >(#2% 2 1'%&22   2%E &%B& :(2GG27 1 &22& 2  %2?&%21

  2&2   2 &22&&:'$  7:&   %&   8%2 %E2%  % '  (  & >2E 2%12% '22%%E2&1

51   %  7: % G  22% 2 2:2 (2%2  > 2 5 L'7%G&( %2 C &% % 2%& 2  2% 227#G&22 1

  $>2   ?  G    E2?  &22&& :?'  &  2 6 > %2 > E2>?%%(%2>2 2%1 >7' $ > 2&2 &22&&(%2'%G% (2 'E%   &'%&&2?2E 2%:(6 17%':2E>  E% %2 C  1

+1  ! E%  %   9 1 $%  ' G2 %&8'  %& ?E2%'C >76 LA@//1"; 1-+10 =1 PPPPP

+  (&  (    

,-./" 0

(8%2 9 .%H )//+!%233333333%  22%(2 %&%82 (2: 2%0-92 )//+2 2 % &2%2 2?&%2N

./%0

9 N

& 6#:% &%&  LA@//1"N

2  G' %E%&&  ?  2 -)   2(    %2 E   28 E  0+ 92 )//4 ; A"$ 0+.100/='    C    C  %      9% G2 2(   % 2E2 2% "(   28 E'   (%2  %& 27%2 82N&&%2%%2 22G%2%' &% 2E &%B( % 2: % %%& 2N2 %2  C    28 E' 0///  0@'  (%2 %  %  (%2

*),-.*)//+ "+*+"

 %2G ? %2 2%  M 2 @)  A1    C     27  %2%  % ' 2(%G %&& &%B  (' %2(  C  9%2  6 M(%2N

%&&2G    C  6 ! " # $%&&' (%   %  22 GM(2 %&%82 (2: 2% 6M%EE2E% 61

$2: < !&%(B'2 '!!1B#7  #2'9:1

%& 28&22  2E<

:EE27"92 <  (2"2 <     12%"$2:2  1%(B   

%2%E%& C  %&&2G? 21

 7('  :EE27<           

*),-.*)//+