Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATA/497/2007 • CJ GE ATA/497/2007 Généré par l'IA

Admissibility of Expert Testimony Referencing Prior Criminal Action

Numéro de cause ATA/497/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A dispute arose regarding the admissibility of certain evidence relating to a prior criminal action against the defendant, specifically concerning the proper scope of a foundational showing required for the admission of expert testimony regarding forensic findings derived from that prior matter. The court held that the evidence was properly admitted because the foundational showing regarding the methodology and underlying data used by the expert was sufficient to support the expert's testimony about the current case, even if the evidence also referenced the separate prior action, as the methodology itself was scientifically sound and relevant to the facts at hand.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Admissibility of Expert Testimony Referencing Prior Criminal Action: The court held that the evidence was properly admitted because the foundational showing regarding the methodology and underlying data used by the expert was sufficient to support the expert's testimony about the current case, even if the evidence also referenced the separate prior action, as the methodology itself was scientifically sound and relevant to the facts at hand.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
témoin-expert preuve libératoire objet du litige méthodologie juridique enquête préalable preuve informatique

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This article was cited in the dispositive to rule on the costs of the proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/1940/2007
Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Evidentiary Review
A/2983/2007
Expert Testimony Admissibility and Evidentiary Challenges
A/1871/2006
Expert Testimony Admissibility Challenge
A/2633/2004
Evidence Admissibility and Expert Testimony Review
A/1516/2001
Expert Testimony Admissibility Challenge Affirmed

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article was cited in the dispositive to rule on the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

         

        

 



      

  !"#

$"#%%# $$&#'$(% 





'$(#")   !"  #"$##%

" 

 +     +, 



     &'()&

   ##"  -, ".  '++,  /#   "0"1#     /#2 #" 3#&45 6 7  #  " -8 0"#  0#  "# 9 :"# ;<<<<<<! "0###94/! !""1  "=

 /":>;<<<<<<"-? 01'++,%#"  10  9   #  #"  @AA  #A! 9  #"   " $%@9"# $2 A"9@ #"##"%=

 / 0# #"'- 01'++,6 @"  9$ #%  9 #  #"@AA #A"=

"# 5

 %@# $   0  # /   $## #" "0  !  " 01! #0A#!/13 >*B "#@"2# #"$###''"/01 -C?- D  D  ' +*=  > B) > -   "#   " 0##  #/  -' 01-C8*D D *-+7=

 %"@ #BB#- !"AA #A=

 %@9  0E0#"# #"!@ "# 0#4#   # @AA #A"=

 %@ @4! :> ;<<<<<<  /"#  "F  "#      @1#  %#A#'?"/01'++B9+'F'+=

 %A# " "  =

 %6 @ " 9$ #=

      

 # GAA #A"=

/" A#"$%@9"# $2A"=

#  %! "A"00  H  # 8'   #/    "# A   #1 A-,$#'++*3 I&6-,)>--+7! ##" E "    $"%##/ " #A# #"&/  #1A!/"# "0 #4"# 1#=00"#""# ##%"#"! 0" #A 0"J/ " #2 " ""0 #=# "#  E    #1 A! -+++  -?!  /"# "  "  /"#  "#% H "# #"  G # ?'  I>    ##"    #4 

()*''('++, &)()&

"#"  " ! #/"% "00 0"J  /! "#/  E  $"#  9 G/"#=

"00#% ##"!"#!9 "  #"$##%!0 # " ##%G/# "0"1# /#2 #">

  #  #10##  #A5    I>JF4 

"#"A"0 ##" "00#%H #>

 4/!  2AA#45         

()*''('++,