Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATA/481/2007 • CJ GE ATA/481/2007 Généré par l'IA

Enforceability of Contract Modification Lacking Consideration and Clear Assent

Numéro de cause ATA/481/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party alleged that a modification to a commercial agreement, specifically concerning the scope of a waiver, was not valid because it lacked proper consideration and was not supported by a clear, unmistakable agreement to the new terms. The court reasoned that while the modification did attempt to alter the relationship between the parties, the record did not demonstrate that the party seeking to enforce the modification provided any new consideration to support the relinquishment of existing rights, nor was there sufficient evidence of a clear and unambiguous assent by the other party to the specific terms of the modification, leading to the conclusion that the purported modification was unenforceable.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 68 al. 2 LTF; Enforceability of Contract Modification Lacking Consideration and Clear Assent: The court reasoned that while the modification did attempt to alter the relationship between the parties, the record did not demonstrate that the party seeking to enforce the modification provided any new consideration to support the relinquishment of existing rights, nor was there sufficient evidence of a clear and unambiguous assent by the other party to the specific terms of the modification, leading to the conclusion that the purported modification was unenforceable.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
contrat commercial renonciation au droit contrat d'enregistrement modification de la servitude notion de pouvoir adjudicateur nullité des ententes

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision governs the allocation of court costs and was explicitly cited in the final order concerning costs.

Art. 68 al. 2 LTF

This provision governs the allocation of legal costs between the parties and was explicitly cited in the final order regarding compensation for legal costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

         

        

 



      

 !"#$

%#$&&$!%%'$(%)& 





(%)$#*++++++  !"#$" "#%$# 

# 

 ,     ,*  



     &'('&

   # " -   '.  /0 '++,  !#" 111111 #   ""#$" #/#0" $"2 "#''#3 '++," " # /"#" "4/#"%##0  #5

 $6 ""'#"#/""  "$7' /0 789:5

 $6 ":;2/  "0/""  "<:<$"'++,5

      

 " 6<< "<#5

$# <"#-=6>#" -2<#5

"  =% #<#//  4  " 9'   "$    #" <   "0 <7,-"'++:? @&A7,)B77+C% ""# D #    -#=""$ # "<" "#&$  "0<%$#" #/ ";#" 0"5//#"##" ""=#"#% /# "< /#E$ # "2 # ##/ "5" #"  D    "0 <% 7+++  7.%  $#" #  #  $#"  #"= 4 #" "#  6 " .'  @B    ""#    ";  #"#  # % "$#= #// /#E  $% #"$  D  -#"  > 6$#"5

#//"= ""#%#"%>!"#$" "#%$# #  ""=6$" #/#0" $"2 "#B

  "  "0/""  "<F     @BEG; 

#"#<#/ ""# #//"=4 "B

 ;$%  2<<";F   

()*+'('++,