Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATA/468/2006 • CJ GE ATA/468/2006 Généré par l'IA

Property Dispute Settlement Agreement Affirmation

Numéro de cause ATA/468/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge de l'autorité
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant challenged a final judgment regarding a property dispute, asserting that the trial court erred in finding that the parties had reached a binding settlement agreement concerning the division of assets. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's ruling, reasoning that the evidence presented, including contemporaneous communications and conduct, sufficiently demonstrated that the parties intended to be bound by the terms reached during negotiations, thereby establishing a valid contract despite the absence of a formal, finalized document.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 64 LTF; Property Dispute Settlement Agreement Affirmation: The appellate court affirmed the trial court's ruling, reasoning that the evidence presented, including contemporaneous communications and conduct, sufficiently demonstrated that the parties intended to be bound by the terms reached during negotiations, thereby establishing a valid contract despite the absence of a formal, finalized document.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
règlement du litige documents valables notion de décision partage de la propriété partie au contrat contrat de mariage

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied for the allocation of costs in the final decision.
Art. 64 LTF
Applied regarding the allocation of costs, contingent on inability to pay.
Généré par l'IA
A/1915/2006
Affirmation of Judgment in Real Property Contract Dispute
A/2978/2006
Contract Validity Dispute and Affirmation
A/663/2005
Property Rights Dispute Affirmation
A/1810/2003
Settlement Agreement Validity Dispute
A/92/2007
Settlement Agreement Validity and Procedural Compliance in Property Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied for the allocation of costs in the final decision.

Art. 64 LTF

Applied regarding the allocation of costs, contingent on inability to pay.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



        

        

 

   

 

 !"#"$%&





&#%"'()))))) 



* + **,, *** +(, 





     !"# 

*

61,,6,!&7,$0&&*

!*  8  , 6, 6  4,  19,    4,:, ;, 63<8 =.5//1,3,, ,3*

>*   $' 7, !((#. 2 ()?##. 5,// ,,  4,     ,,.@5,A,5975B4,2 ?C#)536/,/* ,.,54//@5,, 2&&D1"?.1:/,//,.@4,/,,1,/2#(D1"?2 ,* ,,./61//!&D1"?*

%*   E/  !$ 1 !(().  8   ,/  61,  , 

,,,3$!/19$0#';  8&%$*($=*

  ,16,,1 2 5,   /,, ,,:,*  ,@,4,11,5,A,@,4,, 6,,@.AA?1A,.,4,//6,5,/6,9 9,5/A,.,4,66F/,4,15//* 1G44,6AA5:1,/914,*

    ,,/   A, @5  @ A,  7:. , /,   ://1 6H  ,*  54,  // .   6 6A,. , 4,, 6, ,H A 1,  4, 5 16:, 5@69 I1D,:J61?/,*/, 66/2/64,635:.,.*861,.,  4, 4 I5,11 ,AA,/ 6 1 ;= K?  ;= 69,,/J*

)*  6,//16,6$07,!(()*

//6/,/125,L4,*54,71,AA ?1A,66/54,6/1/,* 6., A,1/@5,,, 8,64,@5,6, 1/,19.@,516E?,516669,*

 9*  8   6,/   /,,.  4  5,16  5H3  4,*

"$%&'"!(() >"# 

* ,

$*  7/  16 , 4  7,,, 16/.    49;*#) ,M:,,7,,,!!419$0%$    !(#N*)>*$,*, 6/1,,,4$! 619$0'#    #$(=*

!*  ? , 6  ,:H   1@ .  6,,.  ,:HA,H4,1H,1;*!&*$ N$)!!M ,:,,,3#619$0&0O8.8&%$*!$. P$(' )!=*

>*   M,/,  ,/.  4, 1H,1 ://  4/?, 6 , #( D1"?. @  ,,   .   ,,   4,,9,,/A49M,%,/$M 3:   ,, ,3  $> 419 $0)! ;   8 &%$*$$N P $!$$!&. $00#))%=*

  8  7,6  ,9 A//  1,3 MH3  4, 2 M,/,M,/./614,1H,1,/#2 !(D1"?,6:4,/@,7,A,,164,1 M,$),/> ; P$!!>&. $00&&>>.,*$.6* &>&=./4,6,,3; P$!>$(). $00&&!#. ,*!9.66*&!' &!0/A*,*=*

   /61  !$ 2 !% D1"? ,. @ 2 ,.  ,A, 1F1:4,16,@3:://,61, M,$)9 *

   4?.  /61  !# D1"?  6 Q  6,,6  ,9,:,61,,.A1,AH6,647,A, MH34,HAM19,,.4:4,/1, : @M, 64@*   , .  7,6 ,3 @  11,4,,:,3M3:A1 ;*$)*$**0(?*! N P$!>$(). $00&&!#. ,*!.6*&>$/A*,*N P$!>>&.,*$.66*%( %$.8$00&66* #!& #!'N ">'!"$00'$)7,$00'=*

  ,6,,666,9@,,,,, A49    @  //   A,A , 9  14,*  M:,.  AA.   1,3. M  /,/  ,   A4,@6,9M/:,/,17,,9; P$$09 $#)N8$00>6*#>#N P$$'$0(N$('9)&N$(%9#$=*

   M63.  /61   4, ,/.  1  /.  //  !& D1"?. 63 /,   1:  /,/* 5H3 

"$%&'"!(() %"# 

4,  ,  2  ,1, ,A/,   :4. 1, , 5:, /1, 5 ,A,   /:,. ,, 6 5, $) ,/ $  *

   / 1,,1  ,  61,   , 1, 63  11,, 5 A :4*  /,,  8  5  2  1,,11. A,1/.H6,,,4H, @,11,5,A,@,64/,1E6,  ,/,  , 5/  /,/.  , ,,  , , 5/616,; P$!!$,*>96*)N "$#'"$00'$&1 $00'N "&$%"$00&  $'419 $00&N ")>)"$00)  !09 $00)N  R8 . 8?S,T,? 8A:T9?< UTD11. V,? $00&.!31/*.?*#*>% 6/,!$/19$0>&    8>$$*(=*

%*  6,1A/.7/*

   5,  ,,:.  /11  RP %((*   1, 2  ?:  .@,19;*'& =*

-  *, *   

./0'!"1

/,,4,19,4,:,!$1!((),, 61,6,1,N

0&1

7N

12?:/11 RP%((* N

, @. A1/1 H , 0&  ,4   , A// M:,, 7,,,.6/E6E6/.64,,1,,,A.   7 3  ,A,,. 6 4  ,9 A//N  1/1,  ,,,@,.1,A1F646,: 1,N,,E/,H16,1, ,9 A//. $(((  $%N  6/ E   6,3  6,  .,4@/111F64.,4E7,2M4,N

"$%&'"!(() #"# 

4,:,2MAA,A//2*

8,/:< +14F.6/,.++*F?3 ?/,.7:*

1 ,91,,,A<

:AA,3 7,7*<  4, 6/,<     +* , *4F   

6,A1E//11,@/H6,*

 34.  :AA,3<           

"$%&'"!(()