ATA/433/2007 · Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

ATA/433/2007 • CJ GE ATA/433/2007 Généré par l'IA

Instrument Validity and Statutory Interpretation Appeal

Numéro de cause ATA/433/2007

Autorité / Tribunal Cour de Justice (Cour civile) · Chambre administrative

Juridiction

Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)

Date de la décision 2007-08-28

Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)

Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellate court reviewed a dispute concerning the validity of an instrument where the dispute centered on whether the instrument was supported by consideration and whether the trial court properly interpreted relevant statutory provisions regarding the execution and enforcement of such instruments. The court reasoned that the trial court's finding of valid consideration was supported by sufficient evidence, as the record demonstrated a bargained-for exchange, and further determined that the statutory requirements for validity and enforceability were met under the circumstances presented, thereby affirming the lower court's judgment.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Instrument Validity and Statutory Interpretation Appeal: The court reasoned that the trial court's finding of valid consideration was supported by sufficient evidence, as the record demonstrated a bargained-for exchange, and further determined that the statutory requirements for validity and enforceability were met under the circumstances presented, thereby affirming the lower court's judgment.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA

condition légale interprétation de l'arrêt validité du contrat exécution contrôle juridictionnel consentement et validité au fond

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Imposes the costs of the federal court proceedings on the appellant.

Généré par l'IA

A/3379/2005

Statutory Compliance in Legal Instrument Validity and Amendment

A/1615/2003

Dispute Over Instrument Validity and Conflicting Lower Court Rulings

A/1420/2002

Appeals Concerning Validity and Interpretation of Prior Judgments

A/3481/2006

Property Instrument Validity Dispute

A/359/2007

Appeal Regarding Document Validity and Formal Compliance

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Imposes the costs of the federal court proceedings on the appellant.

Texte complet

!"# $#%&'

(#))))))

* + ** ,, ** * +- ,

!"#

'( )*)++++++,-'&#.,*///-0 12 3** 4/56/*/!%%#,//76*//6 -3/(

!( -// !$ */ !%%8, -- 9-/ : , ;/ *:/ ;/3/ </ 6=> ? @ /- 0 / 6-;/46*//7/--6-/-*/-/ /*6-*09*664/6=7//;// *-/-3<)@4/7-;6/0/;-1/ *:/(-//4//6/6=9*, *//,-//9*/(

/ -// -/ */;- 6 6/ -- */= // /= /; A 7/-- -/ / 7*6/ 7,/;/4-7-1B*=6/3(

$( #-*:!%%8,7)66(*/-;/ /44/-0C7///70///( --* 766-// 0 /6// 6*/ 6 7-:/ 79/ 71:/ -1B/A *, 7/--, //A 0 7-3 /4//,//-*/-0///07;/ 06*6*/-61:(7-;/6B1//A;/*/ -;//6/-6-/4/A*/A/7-/66 0 //A / *( = , 7/-- -/ /*-60/;-1/0*(

.( -//'#-*:!%%8,? ;-*6-;/; !$*/!%%8/-6*//0)*)++++++(

8( !D-*:!%%80!%1%8,7/--//0;-,-/3,0 5///6?/A7;/- 7,7B3B-;--97-*/',$."( ; 7; 1C9, 7 6- ;/ // / 6*7:/A031/;(*E;, 7 6 4*- 0 61 3 /39 ( // 6-;7;B7;317A/B-30*, A/;/-*-3/=*6/7; 1C96:/4A0 31//6?/(

"$%%&"!%%# $"#

#( '%4-;/!%%#,? */07)6/666/ -:/ $' F;/ !%%# 0 / 4/ */-, 4/ ;/ / //*///66#-*:!%%8(

D( /!.4-;/!%%#,7),;/7/-- /7-;-*!D-*:!%%8,/*-A7/9// -/9 A 0 76/ 0 / /, / :/ 6 6B1/A A / 66 0 7( 7 6A/ / 6// //A- 6 * 6;// / 6*/ / 7/*6;-;/(

G( -//!GF/!%%#,? -0)*)++++++ * 0 ; 96/ 6= 7), 4/ !D-*:!%%8 B *- /- 0 ;/ A 0 6/0/;-1/0*(-//4//6/ A7/*/0/96/,*//, -//9*/(

&( */ 0 6 ?/ !' H !%%# ; /// 7 0 =;, )* )++++++ 6= /: *///4 -// 6-/-, 0 /( -/ /*6-/4 A7 ; 6*/ /, /;/- 64/ /*6/A 6// 6 6 1/6-( !D -*: !%%8, //0;-;B/6A/6*//-/-( F 0 -/ /;/- 0 42 , 6-;B A7 /A/ :/ 7, ;/ 6-/-* -/- 7// *B */( 4/ 7-/ -- 6 *6 6= 796/ 0 6/ 0 / / -/ 9 A / / */4/- -/ / :4( ;*-//66/-(

'%( 7/ *6/ 6 6/ !!6*:!%%#, )* )++++++ 4/*- , -/-*0;96/(

''( /'':!%%#,7/--//A-A7;/-3- ;/ / ; 4/ !D -*: !%%8( 6-/- A7-/-*/*///-5;/-13-6*// 6*/ 4I/ -6/ 6 ? ( 7 4/ 4/ 6/=0F,7796-///---: 6-/B--6-0=;(

'!( 6= ;/ ;-/4/- / )* )++++++ -/ 3/- 3/ 744/ 66/ *///- 0 =; - A 7-/ 6 , 7/-- B - -6 6

"$%%&"!%%# ."#

5,='!*/!%%#,F3--3-,DF/!%%D,*-? 7/*//-//(

'$( '.F/!%%D,? -66744/*/;()*)++++++-/ F//76*///()2*/7-/6/ * ;/ 2 6/ 0 / 796/, /// 4/ 36*//-3////6-(

'.( / !8 F/ !%%D, /: *///4 *- 0 )*)++++++/6;7-136*// 6*/4I///A7/*//5(

'8( '$H!%%D,)*)++++++*//:-6/ 6*//4I/,-/;-.F/!%%#,6-3/ ',',//A747-//-,9**/ 0/"J ?;/(

* ,

'( F- *6 / ; F/// *6-, ;:<(8# /K3//F///!!;*:'&.' ! %8L ( #$ ( ' /( / 6- *///; '!6*:'&G8 8'%@(

!( 6*//62-/;-9/A/447 4*-6/60/<('./4-- // /= '& -*: '&8G ? D.'(%'@( , 7/- 0 *-/ / -/3- 6 *2*4/0//6-//-1/9( 9* 6B13/A / 76/ -/ 6B1/A A- / <( '': ( ' -3 K*// 6 ;-1/0///=!D:'&D# ?D.'(8'@(

76=, ? 6/7/--,A/ *6 766-// *-/ 7) B 66 #-*: !%%8 76/ 0 / , 6= A7/ / -- ;/- 4/ ; !D -*: !%%8( ; 6/= 6/ 6-, 4 A 7/- //*- /6/ 44/7--*6;/76/ 0 /( 7 / 61 ? 7;/ /*6- 0 /=;96/6=7)(

$( 4/ A / -*/ *///- 5 // 7 6*/ / 4I/ 7- 6/ 6/A7

"$%%&"!%%# 8"#

-// / 6*/ 0 / 6-;/4 7 -- 6- 0 7 7/--(*M/=/?/,13* 7-AA*A? 6/60/ ;667),7376*//-36; 2 // ; /6// A/ 766/A / 6*/ //<(.8(' @(

.( )4-,F-(-** J5.%%( */0 13,A/*:<(GD @(

NNNNN

. *, *

/01"(#2

-;:/F-!'H!%%#6)*)++++++ -//;/*:/;/3/!GF/!%%#L

1'2

*013-** J5.%%( L

/ A, 4*-* 9 / G! /; / 4-- /: 4-- 'D F/ !%%8 < 5 ? 'D$(''%@, 6- 2 6 2 6- F A/ /; /4// 6 ; /: 4--, 6 ;/ */=/6:/L*-*////A/, */4*B6;6/3*/L/ / 2 - /: 4--, '%%% '., 6 ;/ 6 6 ;/ -/A 9 // K/ .! 5( 6- 2 6/= 6/ , /;A- *B 6;, /; 2 F/ 0 K;/L

/A6-20)*)++++++//AK;/*:/ ;/3/0K44/4--0(

?/-3> )(B1=,6-/,)*J/,F3(

"$%%&"!%%# #"#

* /:*///4>

344/= F/F((/(> 6-/> ( 5(B1=

6/4*2--/A-96/(

=;, 344/=>

"$%%&"!%%#

Instrument Validity and Statutory Interpretation Appeal

Synthèse Legislator

Regeste Legislator

Mots-clés

Dispositions légales citées

Décisions connexes

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Texte complet