ATA/420/2006 • CJ GE ATA/420/2006 Généré par l'IA

Contract Valuation Dispute and Tort Claims Dismissal

Numéro de cause ATA/420/2006

Autorité / Tribunal Cour de Justice (Cour civile) · Chambre administrative

Juridiction

Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)

Date de la décision 2006-07-26

Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party sought relief based on a theory that the opposing party breached a contract and committed a tort by failing to provide accurate financial information and acting in bad faith concerning a business transaction, specifically challenging the valuation used for an interest in an entity as of a specific date. The court reasoned that the contract explicitly dictated the method for determining the valuation, which the opposing party followed, and there was no contractual basis or legal duty violated that would support the claims of breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, or misrepresentation, leading to a dismissal of the claims.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 93 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Contract Valuation Dispute and Tort Claims Dismissal: The court reasoned that the contract explicitly dictated the method for determining the valuation, which the opposing party followed, and there was no contractual basis or legal duty violated that would support the claims of breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, or misrepresentation, leading to a dismissal of the claims.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA

violation de la bonne foi devoir contractuel théorie juridique droit de caractère civil date déterminante d'évaluation transaction financière

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA

Used to declare the appeal inadmissible.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Imposed the court costs on the appellant because the appeal was dismissed.

Généré par l'IA

Contract Breach Regarding Valuation Methodologies

Contract Breach and Damages Award

Contract Breach and Damages Dispute

Breach of Contract and Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Claims Dismissed as Derivative

Contract Breach and Damages Award

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 93 BGG

Used to declare the appeal inadmissible.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Imposed the court costs on the appellant because the appeal was dismissed.

Texte complet

!"#$

#$! %&&&&&&

' ( '' )) '' ' (* )

!"#

'

$( ) *+ !&&' , -+ *.+ -+/+0+ 1234 5,+/,/+67(8999999 ,++ 4 !# -+ !&&'6 1*+ ++ ++1:;(

!( $< *+ !&&'6 4 *+ 7( 8999999 +. *+++=6 +>*+=*2?(

@( $%*+!&&'6/== +.*+++=+=*,7(8999999 ?.+/+=+A*++,?A+,1.+: / ? +-+, B +=+ B A+/ ,+ ,/ (7(8999999?1,+B+C+(

#( 1+, !DC+!&&'6 /== +. *+++= ,+,,+-+++*1+B7(8999999,+11,*+ $) C+ !&&'( 1+6 ,*, ,+ / C:? $&C+!&&'6,,1(

' )

$( 4 ?+ '# +, ! + 1, *+++- $! 1*.$D)<0 <$&56,B+,+*1, *+?==+BC+++*+++-*1, -+(?,1,,1,BB:+,,,B1*+2 +,(

C, *1 +6 -. B ,/ 0( '@ ( $ ( 5(

!( 4 C+16 + - +,6 1- +*1 / ==++ / C+++ A+/ +1,,+/,/0 E +. =,,!<-+$DD%61.+,+4$DD)1(@$$5(

2-/=F+0 "$@D"$DD)$&*$DD)5(

@( -+ +,, +=+, * ** G ++ 1 ==+-* 1+6 *+ ,CB : -+ - 1H2 ?+=6 :+ 1* ++ ? 1 +(?-+1,,-+,,*+++ **G+ ++B16?+?1+,,+

"$%%%"!&&' @"#

1 C =+A, B ==6 + C + 1 + ?-+ 0( I6 ,*+++-6!&&&61($&&,=,+,5(

#( ?1+=+AA+/+.6*/,A1+ ?>+-+6,+J*,++,1,-+,, +=+, -.* B ++( 1 ,: ,, +-.(

<( ,** KL #&&( *+ B H/ 6 :+ *.0()% 5( MMMMM

+ ') '

,-.# /0

, +-. +C, ) *+ !&&' 1 7+ 8999999 ?E, -+ *.+ -+/+ !# -+ !&&' 1*+++++1:;N

*BH/,** KL#&&( N

+:1,EB7+8999999++:?-+*.+ -+/+B?==+=,,B(

4+,/3 7(>H261,+67*K+6C/(

* +.*+++=3

/==+2 C+C(3 1,+3 7( + L(>H2

"$%%%"!&&' #"#

1+=*E,,+:,A1+(

2-6 /==+23

"$%%%"!&&'