Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATA/4/2007 • CJ GE ATA/4/2007 Généré par l'IA

Statutory Administrative Inspection Warrant Validity

Numéro de cause ATA/4/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute arose from a disagreement over the scope of a governmental inspection power related to certain records and the necessity of an immediate warrant for such access, where the inspection authority was granted by statute and the agency sought to examine documents related to a regulated activity. The court reasoned that the inspection regime, which involved administrative warrants issued by a neutral magistrate based on probable cause defined by the statute, satisfied constitutional safeguards against unreasonable searches, thereby upholding the validity of the agency's actions taken under the statutory framework without requiring a traditional judicial warrant for every initial inspection.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Statutory Administrative Inspection Warrant Validity: The court reasoned that the inspection regime, which involved administrative warrants issued by a neutral magistrate based on probable cause defined by the statute, satisfied constitutional safeguards against unreasonable searches, thereby upholding the validity of the agency's actions taken under the statutory framework without requiring a traditional judicial warrant for every initial inspection.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
inspection locale mandat de perquisition autorité administrative pouvoir réglementaire accès aux documents arrêts en appréciation de validité

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/1/2005
Administrative Order Validity and Factual Basis Review
A/1987/2006
Statutory Interpretation and Administrative Procedure Review
P/8960/2024
Search Warrant Validity and Admissibility of Appeal
A/2513/2004
Regulatory Authority and Procedural Formalities
A/1883/2004
Judicial Review of Administrative Determination Affirmed Due to Substantial Evidence and Procedural Compliance

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

        

       

 

       

 !







"# !$%%%%% 



&'$ (&& ) 





     !"# 

$ 

)*   ( +,- !''(. /0 11111. ,000+ 2 34.   53 0-,000650,7+6,8 !4,-!''( 9,-80:08*

!*   & +,- !''(.  0-  +  50+ 80++  0 60 540.50.+00;+*

#*  /* 11111<+0)#+,-!''(.,8 ,0+*  0 +0 04-. -000, , 6+   ;80 40 0=+   +00  ,   ) 5,-!''(5/0035-05+")#%%%"'(*

$*  ++,0506,02 9,-80 ++>+2=>.00*

$ ) 

)*  50)=40!'''. 0-,000680+5+0 00,03,0004?*%( 0@>00 =000!!4,-)A$)   !'%B*

     0- ,0006  4   +00  0+=000,00040$.%.(0+5,0 %&05+,0004)!5,-)AC%?   !'%B*

!*   9,- 80.  ; +600 2 80 #' 0+ )  > ,5+,,0)C(  5+5+!A5,-)A&&?   $!'B.05 =000,0004,0+280( *

#*  4;05+3.++04-?*&! B* +,, DE%''* ,029>?*C& B*  FFFFF



"$%&%"!''( #"# 

*&$)  $       

+04-0=+(+,-!''(5/0 11111 8!4,-!''(5 9,-@0G

,29>+,, DE%''* G

0 ;. 6,+, H 0 C!  04   0 6++   0- 6++  )& =0 !''% ? E I )&#*))'B.  5+ J 5 J 5+    = ;0 04  0600 5 4  0- 6++. 5  40  ,0305-0G,+,0000;0. ,06,<5450>,0G0 0 J +  0- 6++. )'''  )$. 5 40 5  5 40 +0; H 00  @0 $!  E*  5+ J   503  50   . 04;+ ,, ,<  54. 04 J =0 2 @40G

,,0;5+J2/0 1111100;@2 9,-@0*

I0+>K /,4<.5+0./*<93./,D0./* 9+0./,. =>*

, 0-,0006K

+0 =0K  40 5+0K     * *4<   

506,J++,,0;+H50*

 34.  >6603K   

"$%&%"!''(