Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATA/399/2007 • CJ GE ATA/399/2007 Généré par l'IA

Eminent Domain Challenge Based on Private Benefit Claim Fails

Numéro de cause ATA/399/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A property owner challenged a governmental entity's use of eminent domain to acquire land for a public improvement project, asserting that the acquisition was for a private benefit, specifically favoring one landowner over others, and that the necessity for the full extent of the taking was not adequately demonstrated. The court held that the evidence supported the governmental entity's determination that the taking was for a legitimate public purpose, finding that the proposed improvements served a significant public need and that the evidence did not sufficiently demonstrate that the taking was primarily motivated by an improper private purpose, thus affirming the right to condemn the property for the intended use.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Eminent Domain Challenge Based on Private Benefit Claim Fails: The court held that the evidence supported the governmental entity's determination that the taking was for a legitimate public purpose, finding that the proposed improvements served a significant public need and that the evidence did not sufficiently demonstrate that the taking was primarily motivated by an improper private purpose, thus affirming the right to condemn the property for the intended use.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
propriété privée droit d'exproprier droit d'utilisation usage particulier domaine public modification de la servitude

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied because costs are imposed on the appellant.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



         

        

 



            

 !

"#$%%$!""&$'"(% 





'"($#))))))  !"##$#%&' 

' 

  *   



     ()*+(

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

*),--*)../ (+*+(

  

        

A   2   #  #'  0::  #: '   0   ' '+.A# )../!'#3444444?

:#B#)F 2@)../ '#0  '''?

&' :#?

#  $% ':'22  B  # ==+   #&    '# :   #@ :=/A#)..D5 3(G=/+8==.9% ##' 1 '    A'$##& ' #:# #'(&  #@:%&'# '' #  #'@###?22'#''# ##$'#'% 2' #: 2'H& ' #; ' ''2 #?# '#  1    #@ :% =...  =-%  &'# '  '  &'#  '#$ B '# #'  0 # -)  38    ##'    #6  '#'  ' % #&'$ '22 2'H  &% '#&  1  A'#  C 0&'#?

  #  #@2##  #:7     38H"6 

'# ':'2    ##'    '22#$  '#  '     '#0  8

 6&%  ;::#67         

*),--*)../