Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATA/389/2007 • CJ GE ATA/389/2007 Généré par l'IA

Insurance Policy Interpretation and Duty to Defend/Indemnify

Numéro de cause ATA/389/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case addresses a dispute involving multiple overlapping agreements and insurance policies related to a property claim, where the core issue was determining which provision governed the obligation to defend and indemnify against covered losses, particularly concerning a specific exclusion related to property damage. The court reasoned that the interpretation of the comprehensive contractual scheme, when read together, established that a particular exclusion in one policy unequivocally applied to the damages claimed, thereby relieving the insurer of its duty to defend and indemnify under that specific agreement, a conclusion supported by the unambiguous language limiting coverage for the type of loss sustained.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Insurance Policy Interpretation and Duty to Defend/Indemnify: The court reasoned that the interpretation of the comprehensive contractual scheme, when read together, established that a particular exclusion in one policy unequivocally applied to the damages claimed, thereby relieving the insurer of its duty to defend and indemnify under that specific agreement, a conclusion supported by the unambiguous language limiting coverage for the type of loss sustained.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
police d'assurance dommages-intérêts contractuels accords particuliers dispositions anticumul réserve d'assurance dette alimentaire

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The final order dismisses the appeal and rules on the costs, citing this provision.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

        

        

  

    



 ! "#$





$!# % &&&&&&& 



' ( '' )) '' ' (* ) 





     !"# 

' 

()  *+,,,,,,,-.+++/,,,,,,- .0+1-++23.+ +45+-/+6/&7+!''')

!)  8+3+ +0.+++4-2 //.+9+++9++:6/+;)

<)  =4/6+!''&->(#:?=-2+//++624@0 >    :A  ++   3  @.) +4 >  +@++.+-+/++64@0;++6+ +)

?)  33(!4/6+!''&-@.;;2+ 2/+@@/4:A"06B6/+;-*),,,,,,, 26+33C/@>+@++.+;+/+>3:@ ++)6+3/>.0++6   8+  +   6+   06 3/+/  ++    +6) 26   4@ 6+ :/  4 +  6/:+  *),,,,,,,)

   @.  ++ 2++ 2 /.+ ;+  6+ > 2++   :A"06 B6/+;    6   ++)2+36+//+/30+36 4;+6+/;2:2/+3+D 4@- 2 0  2 0)  + 6+    D  ++ 06 B6/+;  ++    +6)  /.+ 6+ +../+. 4+ ;; 3     :A 6  @  +@++ .+- ;+ /+ >  3: 6 3    .:  4@ 0)  6+  ;;  6 ;  4  3  7-3+@)36+3+2E6+4@0)

=)  6+/36+.0+6+@+F+ 39G8 H> 4+6+06+-*),,,,,,,23.+4/)

#)  C/#.!''&-8 ++>*),,,,,,,4+@ 3.++/@+++3+.+- 33++  2+ (# +/ !     + 4//   ++ +9  ($ /.0 ($=% F   8 &?()'(H)  8    ;2+ 2@++2+4+@6)

&)  *) ,,,,,,,  ++  +0 .+++4 2    /++3/+/3((.!''&)2+6=76+FG 4/6+H!''&2/+34-+::+:.++3)

"$%&"!''& <"# 

 .0++  > 6+6  6+ /3/- 3  A   6/:+  @+  3+ +I+  .9 6   3   A/+)26+30J/4)

  *) ,,,,,,,   4+ 6+  0+ 34+  +3 26/:+>.-6+3+2++4+@+4+; ;+/. /3)8+2++++8+6+C 4+./-.31+20+@+++)

%)  3+//+.3+3!= 6+!''&)

  *),,,,,,,//6+31/6+ BK(&') ;++ //+4+@/>+4+3/+/)3+/.-  ++4+;2+6+3/+@++.+) ;2+ /+4-+6+6+34+6+//:/ 3.0+++6+)

$)   +0 .+++4  / 2++   .0++ +.3+;/++)

  2+!<.+!''&-/.+233//)

  / > 2+- *) ,,,,,,,  D3+;/ ;-  7  4+- + +.->=-.D+..#L.":)6++>963+;; 7.+::+E+6+)2D+3;4 +3/>2@;2+/+@@/4) 6:-+/+ +3C3/@)

   26+ 3 /  6+ ;2+ 6+ 5 + >  /6/.)

(')  /.+//2+!'7+!''&)

    D3/ ;2+ 6+  ;+ 6   +  ++  +6)6+3/3.+4-;+/+63++- +.D-6/@.->2++6 :A) +6/>:4-+/+/++6 6/:+;++6+@:) ..26+/0+3+-4D/+ 1:+/ >  +)  3+   2+/ ; 2 .0++ 26+33/+@++.+++)

  /.+//;2+4++77)6+; 4D/+1:+/-;+2.3C:+3@)

"$%&"!''& ?"# 

  3/3-/.+.+;3+6+3/ 3:GM4+-:0+.6+N)

  +./6+..:>?=L.":3/+/;2+216+  6/:+   @:)  +   6+ ./+  26+ 3 6  6/:+  *) ,,,,,,, 6  :)  26+ 3  3 @/   @:62@@4-//;4/+63 +)

(()  8;+-+0@/>7@)

' ) 

()  7/  .3 + 6  7+++ .3/-    60F)=# +O@++7+++!!6.0($?(    !'=P)#<)(+)+3/.+++6(! 3.0($%=    =('H)

!) ) : + 3  +@D   .; -  3++-  +@++ .+ F) !& ) (  P ) (#  #%  O   +@+++9=3.0($&$ 8&?()!( 8P ($%(?!?P K('&=(H)

 0) + ;    6+ 6+/  +@++ .+-  +0.+++4+3;+;O+00+/+/4;++  3:/)  44- +  //- + 0+      ;2 +  .3+ 3- ;2+ ::+  :.+-  +  6++>96;3+;;7) 396+4:./ ;2+6+3/@-+4++3.;46+3 C3/> 2@  ;2+ /+ @@/   4)  > 2 .0++ +.3+;/   ++-  +0 .+++4 96 ;2+ 0//4+++  26-4D/1:+/5-;+2. 3/)

<)   3.+   ;+  @6. .3.+  /+/  4++C+/F)(#)() P)<!)!O/@ O.++36/:+>+++9!&0 ($&#  H) :13:9/+/;-36++O9@ ++-//@/+D3/+/O+ 3++;F K('%0!=?P K('=0((%-3)!==P K('?0=!-  ($&%?'! ?'?P K($%'-3)?(?H)-/.++. ++.+F)(#)!)  H)233++ 2+(# +6./- +04//4+./;/

"$%&"!''& ="# 

.++.+3C/+F C +04//# )<%"!''# &3.0!''#H)

?)  2@ O 3.+  + /@ 3 C ++  6  +3++;+O33+;+3.+++F)?= P K('%0#' #(H)

=)  239-8 4++33+++/++ 44++;)

#)  6;+3/9-7/-/.. BK?'')  /.+>:@-;+.0F)%& H) QQQQQ

+  ')  '    

,-.% /

/60+7/(!.!''&3*+,,,,,,, /++6+.0+6+@+#.!''&+++ 4+ @   3.+  + /@   ++ + 3 + .+P

.$/

7P

.>:@/.. BK?'') P

+ ;- 4./. D + %!  +6   + 4//   +0 4//  (& 7+ !''= F K 8 (&<)(('H-  3/ C 3 C 3/    7 ;+ +6  +4++ 3 6  +0 4//- 3  6+  .+9+30+P./.++++;+- .+4.1363+@.+P+ + C /  +0 4//- ('''  (?- 3 6+ 3  3 6+ /+; D ++  O+ ?!  K)  3/ C   3+9  3+  - +6;/ .. .1  36- +6 C 7+ > O6+P

..+;3/C>*+,,,,,,,-6+.0+ 6+@+++;2>O44+4//>)

"$%&"!''& #"# 

8+/@G *.61-3/+-*)1:9*.B+-7@)

. +0.+++4G

@44+9 7+7))+)G  6+ 3/+G     ) )61    

3+4.C//..+;/D3+)

 96-  @44+9G           

"$%&"!''&