Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATA/384/2006 • CJ GE ATA/384/2006 Généré par l'IA

Arbitrator Authority Over Scope and Validity of Arbitration Agreement

Numéro de cause ATA/384/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute involved the validity of an arbitration agreement and subsequent awards related to a contractual relationship. The court reasoned that the arbitration agreement, despite containing an initial provision suggesting disputes regarding its scope should be resolved by a specific court, contained a subsequent, clear and unequivocal clause granting the arbitrator the authority to determine the scope and validity of the arbitration clause itself, which incorporated a broad arbitration rule granting the arbitrator power over all disputes arising under the contract. Therefore, the court found that the arbitrator properly exercised their authority in ruling on the scope of the agreement and confirmed the resulting awards.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Arbitrator Authority Over Scope and Validity of Arbitration Agreement: The court reasoned that the arbitration agreement, despite containing an initial provision suggesting disputes regarding its scope should be resolved by a specific court, contained a subsequent, clear and unequivocal clause granting the arbitrator the authority to determine the scope and validity of the arbitration clause itself, which incorporated a broad arbitration rule granting the arbitrator power over all disputes arising under the contract. Therefore, the court found that the arbitrator properly exercised their authority in ruling on the scope of the agreement and confirmed the resulting awards.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
validité de clause compromissoire juge arbitre clause contractuelle arbitrage international notion de pouvoir adjudicateur adjudication aux enchères

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the procedural costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



         

        





    

 ! "##$%

& '$(($%& &)$*&"( 



 ++,$$%-*&"$ '......  ! "#$ %  " 

 /  



     &'()&

 %%"%$ %"$%',,-%$$".%%/ $%%%/01%&/2345

 0  "%"   %  %"  !66  %6 %  *- 7% ',,-  3$ 3"%89999991%&/2":8999999"" 45

 0 $% %"3; < %  %"!66 %6" *,7% ',,- 0=66 %.$%5



-*&"0'+*%1

 ;% %= % ! %"">?":8999999<  3 "  %"  *-  $. ',,,  )* "?  ',,*#  % %" ! 7=$ 6%% %6 : "% %.: ">#%&$@$ 'A "? ',,B5

 ;!< %/"" #3%0 "$      " 0%.  60  .% < "$   *+ $.',,A5

 ;  % "$ #    ), $ ',,-#   & < $%/ 0 &  $"   C8*D,E&6035

 ;" "   %  :% % %"5

 ;!%!"" <!: %""0%"%%%"%$ %" 3$%',,-5

 ;% "%0"%"%0 %"%  " #3!""< %  %"!66 %6"5

 ;!< ! %--%*"%"$%%  %0*'  $.*+FA1 & A*,4#"66 %66%! "% % %$ ""!: %""".  "5

 ;!%>%"<% @  %% %=<!: %" %$$% %%" ;#"".  "#"<%"66  &%7;!<"% 7=6"5

 ;  %%         %  !" "%  "$ %;  !66  %6< " "5



('*++(',,- &)()&

 ; " : %""% /"@ 7 %6%% @  %%5

 ;!% @ %/0<0"%"$$% %=% 0% 5

 ;%" <>&G &;!/7=$ 6" ! =$ 5

 ;  3   0  ! % @  .% "  < !: %" %$$% %%" ;5

 ;!< % !% %$#"0.%% " % @  $%" 5

 ;!%0% "$.#%$ "$$% %=%% / "%$"%.5

 ;  /="<! %--%*;!% @ %0"   &%"% < % !66 %6"5

    

 % D66 %6"5

0" 6%"7;!<"% 7=6"5

"$$%; %%"#"%#<! "#$ %" %% ;!<%/0E

  %  %.$%%  %62     8E>G/ 

"%"6"$ %%" "$$%;: %E

 /0#  =66%/2         

('*++(',,-