Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATA/38/2008 • CJ GE ATA/38/2008 Généré par l'IA

Statutory Benefit Calculation: Compounding vs. Base Figure Increase

Numéro de cause ATA/38/2008
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute involved the proper calculation of certain statutory benefits or payments, specifically concerning whether compounding interest or an escalator clause should apply to a base amount over a period, with the disagreement centering on interpretations of relevant legislative language regarding incremental increases. The court reasoned that the statutory text plainly indicated that the mandated increase was not intended to be compounded or applied cumulatively on previously accrued increases, but rather should be calculated solely based on the specified original or current base figure, thereby affirming the lower calculation method.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Statutory Benefit Calculation: Compounding vs. Base Figure Increase: The court reasoned that the statutory text plainly indicated that the mandated increase was not intended to be compounded or applied cumulatively on previously accrued increases, but rather should be calculated solely based on the specified original or current base figure, thereby affirming the lower calculation method.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
calcul de la prestation paiement des intérêts ajustement du montant de base calcul de contribution d'entretien compensation de la différence erreur de calcul

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision is cited in the final order to regulate the court costs.
Généré par l'IA
A/1948/2005
Benefit Calculation Dispute
A/447/2006
Benefit Calculation Dispute Over Statutory Interpretation
A/881/2006
Statutory Interpretation of Minimum Benefit Calculation Dates
A/2128/2007
Statutory Rate Calculation in Settlement Entitlement Dispute
A/4641/2006
Statutory Interpretation of Benefit Calculation Baseline Dates and Economic Index Adjustments

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision is cited in the final order to regulate the court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



        

       

  

    

 !

"# $ %&'





'$ !()))))) 



* + ** ,, ** * +- , 





     !"# 

* 

()  *+,,,,,,-.(/0$-1+++.234)++5 61++.+4.(/7')

!)  8  + 6+ 6  4+  19+    4+:+ ;+ 63< 8 =-   5  ..  1+3  ++ +3)

0)  ((9!&&7-2(%>$#-5+..++4+ 16 2 +3 +++.2'#?1">-@4+.+ +1+.2#&?1">2+) ++-.614++... !#?1">-1:.+.#?1">.+)

$)  4+.68 25A6+1B5+C+6.+.-*),,,,,,  5 6 .)  5 C+ .. @5   16:- 2 6 5?+134+:-++1+.2#&?1">)

#)   D.  # .19 !&&'-  8   +.  61+   +  *),,,,,,6+1+-66++5+(7+C..   ++ +3  (! .19 (/#% ;   8 '$()&(=) 5+. 5    1++11 .:- 16   519  +- 1194+5+..95..)

7) ) +7.19!&&'.8 -*),,,,,,5.. 6+ 6  .4.+.   1-  +  ++.  .+)   E 5+. 4+ 1++  .++- + >++  6 5A.+ B@52  C+  1+  C.4+)  4+  CC 9+   61+ 6 16:  C11- @+ 4+  1 2  +1 >+1+>. 6+@B@52C+1+C.4+)

   6+     .. 4F.  +9 1+++C- @+ 5 :+.114)

 9) '.19!&&'-8 +.*),,,,,,2.661+ 0(1!&&%6)

')   6+ 11.  +16  (0 .19 !&&'-  B: ..:.  A6+@.   @  B+6  +9 C.. .+ +- 11  1+3 5A3  4+ 4 2 5+.+ 5 +.) ++-  .61   4+ +.  !# ?1">- 11  563- G+- C 1+C A6+-  + 1++11 9+:+  61+  +6+1+-4:4+.1+:@5+64@+)  .+  .CA+ .>.  (# B4+ !&&% +  .. . 6 

"$%&#"!&&' 0"# 

6+@5++26.).- +:.2B:5.+)

%)  B-*),,,,,,5.+2+)

* , 

()  B.  16 + 4  B+++ 16.-    49;)#7 +5:++B+++!!419(/$(    !&#H)70)(+)+6.1+++4(! 619(/%#    #(&=)

!)  > + 6  +:A   1@ -  6++-  +:AC+A4+1A+1;)!')( H(7!!5 +:+++3#619(/'/I8-8'$()!(- J(&% 7!=)

0)  5+.++.-4+1A+1:..4.>+6 + #& ?1">- @  ++   -   ++   4++9++.C495+$+.(5 3:+++3(0419 (/7!;  8'$()((H J (!((!'- (//#77$=)

  8  B+6  +9 C..  1+3 5A3  4+ 2 5+.+5+.-.614+1A+1+.#2 !&?1">+6:4+.@+B+C++164+1 5+(7+.0 ; J(!!0'- (//''00-+)(-6) '0'=-.4+6++3; J(!0(&7- (//''!#- +)!9-66)'!% '!/.C)+)=)

   .61  !( 2 !$ ?1"> +- @ 2 +-  +C+ 1F1:4+16+@3::..+61+ 5+(79 )

   4>-  .61  !# ?1">  6 G  6++6  +9+:+61++-6+41+++C+ :8+61++.:-C1+CA6+64 B+C+5A34+AC519++-4:4+. 1+:@5+64@)+-B+6+3 @11+4++:+353:C1 ;)(7)())/&>)! H J(!0(&7-  (//''!#-+)!-6)'0(.C)+)H J(!00'-+)(-66)$& $(-8 (//'66)#!' #!%H "0%!"(//%(7B+(//%=)

"$%&#"!&&' $"# 

  +6++666+9@+++++ C49    @  ..   C+C + 9  14+)  5:+-  CC-   1+3- 5  .+.  +   C4+@6+95.:+.+1B++9; J((/9 (#7H8(//06)#0#H J((%(/&H(&%97'H(&$9#(=)

   563-  .61   4+ +.-  1  .-..!#?1">63.+1:.+.)5:+5  :4- ++ 6 5+ (7 +. (    - @+ +16+@  + 9+:+61++)

$)  85+(7+.! -.1++1+ +1+6311++5C:4)C+ A6++662+6-@.++8 -@+5+2 1++11-4DC+1.)

#)  4@+6.3-B.)

  +4+25A.+1++:+63  !% C.4+ !&&%  +49-   +9 1+++C 5 6 16. 6  G)     .  9B- 6+@  8   6..+6.6K61+B@50(1!&&%)

7)   5+  ++:-  .11  LJ$&&)   1+ 2  >:  -@+19;)%' =) MMMMM

(  *,  *    

B-1E+49-+B.7.19!&&'6 *+,,,,,,.++4+19+4+:+ #.19!&&'++61++6+1+H

1.11 LJ$&&) 2>:H

+ @- C1.1 A + %!  +4   + C..   +9 C..  (' B+ !&&# ; J 8 ('0)((&=-  6. D 6 D 6.    B @+ +4  +C++ 6 4  +9 C..- 6  4+  1+3+69+H1.1++++@+- 1+C1F646+:1+H+ + D .  +9 C..- (&&&  ($- 6 4+ 6  6 4+ .+@ A ++  5+ $!  J)  6. D   6+3 

"$%&#"!&&' #"# 

6+  - +4@. 11 1F  64- +4 D B+ 2 54+H

11+@6.D2*+,,,,,,++@54+19+ 4+:+25CC+C..2)

8+.:< *14F-6.+-)F>3 >.+-B:)

1 +91+++C<

:CC+3 B+<  4+ 6.+<     )+ 8+:+ )4F   

6+C1D..11+@.A6+)

 34-  :CC+3<           

"$%&#"!&&'