Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATA/38/2006 • CJ GE ATA/38/2006 Généré par l'IA

Applicant v. Cantonal Commission (Building Permit Setbacks)

Numéro de cause ATA/38/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge de l'autorité

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An applicant sought annulment of a cantonal commission's decision that rejected their appeal concerning a building permit amendment relating to the execution of structural work on an existing building, specifically challenging the required setback distances. The administrative tribunal dismissed the appeal on the merits, reasoning that the applicable cantonal planning regulations concerning setback distances were correctly interpreted and applied by the commission, finding that the applicant failed to demonstrate any error of law or fact in the determination that the proposed modifications did not justify a deviation from the standard setback requirements.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Applicant v. Cantonal Commission (Building Permit Setbacks): The administrative tribunal dismissed the appeal on the merits, reasoning that the applicable cantonal planning regulations concerning setback distances were correctly interpreted and applied by the commission, finding that the applicant failed to demonstrate any error of law or fact in the determination that the proposed modifications did not justify a deviation from the standard setback requirements.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
modification du permis de construire distances par rapport aux limites erreur de fait erreur administrative réglementation de la construction autorisations de travail

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF

Used to declare the appeal inadmissible (stated in the formal decision part, referring to the procedure).

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied for the ordering of costs for the respondent.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

        

    A/4512/2005 TPE ATA/38/2006

DÉCISION SUR RÉCLAMATION

DU TRIBUNAL ADMINISTRATIF

du 24 janvier 2006





SOCIÉTÉ LUCIEN MONTANT S.A.  !"!#$%$" 

" 

 COMMISSION CANTONALE DE RECOURS EN MATIÈRE DE CONSTRUCTIONS  D PARTEMENT DES CONSTRUCTIONS ET DES TECHNOLOGIES DE L’INFORMATION  D PARTEMENT MUNICIPAL DE L’AM NAGEMENT, DES CONSTRUCTIONS ET DE LA VOIRIE DE LA VILLE DE GEN VE 





     &'()&

EN FAIT

+-  . +)"$/0',,) 121 2'*/./ /"2%  20 /22  23  4   "   "2  2 !"   5- -62&78"2 "/ 9"  "2 2"2$'' 4$2 ',,*    /  "  : ;/#/ %  ;<2/  "#/ = 4";>2"//:"  2"  >""#2;23"/ 2"62&78 9-

  ;2  2" ?  "2  @   .  $2  "/"  " //   "  20%<2; 2 "'*42',,) 2  "/ 2" "   2%  +' 42  ',,)-  2 "  < 'A /0/./%"2 "  "3"; ""1/"232 2"""2 7$% 22 2/"3"%";2  2"& 2-

   422 2"    /2 @  >#   "2   /"/   BC'D),,-& 2";2/2 "-

'-   +A /0 ',,)%  "2   "  / 2"-   1" <  2  7$ ;$2  2$2  "2 "2 %       : 2= 2@#23" 2 2"%/"2323"/;E"   "  2"  2 "   ;#2  > "0 $   "1 " " "3"2"-;<2 "//2  2 232# <; /"/  2 % 7 " <  /"232 2" <; "22 2  $2         2 $%  /./ 2  $2  /2 "" 2 @/1 /%"2 ;0 # ;0 ;/#/ ;/ 2"2$2"-

  "2 "27<;/"   BC),,-&2 "$0 2   /"/ - 5;#2   32   3%  "27 < 1&2 2 F. 2># 227$%7"<& 2$2   2## 2"""&$  20/22  23-

  / " @; 2";. +)"$/0',,) /"G$"2 232#/"/ ;/"   BC'D),,-&  /@<2&2"2 2 @ BC),,-&- " "@;" "2 ;2/2 "@>#27$-

H-   '' /0 ',,)%  /  22 <     2   "3""  23"/< 2 #@4#-

(*)+'(',,) &H()&

EN DROIT

+-  5" ; 2 IJ 2 *   "2   " /22  2$  +'  /0 +AI) 6  &  ) +,9%  /"/  .    422 2" /22  2$$ 32;"04 ;/ 2"2  4" 7  " 232 2"   22"-  ;7%  / 2"    "  / 2-

'-   422 2" /22  2$      32  "    /"/ % "3"//   22   "" 2"2  6 - IJ - +   H  9- ;2 '    2"2 2"  "2  422 2" /22  2$ @ "@ 2?  27/ " 2/ #22/2  "32220"-; 2'7#/  32% /"/    2/2   " /22  2$  H, 42  +AIK

6 )+,-,H L  7#/ 9  2 < ;/"/  ;17 %  7# #   3 "   2" ; / 1 "22 "     2332   227% BC +,D,,,-& 6 (JIK(',,)  '' "$/0 ',,)M (JIH(',,*+A" "0',,*9-

H-  5"42 203 422 2"% 22" 201/ 27D" @. /" 2$%D "2    2222#D2 2 2"D02 26 C ++*  HH' "2- '0 - HH*% +++  + - +&'M (HJK(+AAI  +K 42 +AAIM (+KK(+AAI'*/+AAIM ()+I(+AAJ'K"F +AAJM (*J'(+AAJ  K "F  +AAJM (JH,(+AAK  +, /0 +AAKM (K'K(+AAK  'A " "0 +AAKM ()A*(+AA*  'A "$/0 +AA*9-  1 22 <2 $2  D.   $  #/   / 27  32  >2 " D/"/ 6 (),,(',,''A"F ',,'9-

  ;2  2"    ""   "2 %  2 "    "  3"% " //  @  2  7$%  2 2 2/%  2  "/  "  2"/ 2""  2%/2 20F"""2>#;2 - ; 2$2 "?422 2"" 2/"  - "//" 2  / %2 1 < 2/" . 2"/   22<; "2 /222 2/; "2 2"  " 2 2 2#2-  3"2 "  "7&$0     / ;2  2" <  2   "    <  ;2  "/ 2" "   2%  /   2   " "% "2  <; ;$2   "0   23 2"   "2  <; $2  $"   27 2   'A  /0 ',,)- 22%  422 2"      / @   .   3"% 4    "2"   2"; "2 2"" 2'A4$2',,*2"2 - &27"220/ "/0%"2"  4 < 02 /./  1" /2   .   232   /#/  <; 2 

(*)+'(',,) &*()&

$"2 "0   "  "-  22 ; "/ 2" 1 32 > 7 "  #23  ;02 2- 5;#2    <" 2     " 20 2"%; 2"" 2"#; 2$2 "? 20%202 2-

    @  $  "/ 2"   "// 2 2/   "  3"    ;    7$ @   22 2" 1 >""2 ;$"    "2 % 2 332   < &2  "/0%  "2" ?    4 -  ;? $2  7 "  2  2 " ;2/2 @<$2 " <;2 /2  @/-

*-   / % <"2<; "/0%    "/ @  "$ /"/  "    " 6 JIK(',,) 2 M (KH*(',,)'J /0',,)  ()I'(',,)H,"F ',,)9- NNNNN

PAR CES MOTIFS LE TRIBUNAL ADMINISTRATIF

à la forme :

 $0  / 2" 3"/   "2  2 !"   5- - "  ;.  20/22  23')"$/0',,) au fond :

4 M

2 <D2D OD/"/ M

"//2< 22" @!" !#$%$"  "2  2 !"   5- -% @  "//22"  "  "  / 27  "  2"%   /   "  2"    >""#2  ;23"/ 2"     /  /22;/#/ %"  2" $"2227$-

52# 8 !/"$?%2 %!-?>7%!/B2%!- >2%!/"% 4#-





(*)+'(',,) &)()&

"/ 20/22  238

#3327&42 4-8  $2&2 8     !- ""2 -"$?  

"2"3"/ .  "//2<1 2-

7$%  #33278           

(*)+'(',,)