ATA/371/2006 • CJ GE ATA/371/2006 Généré par l'IA

Contractual Performance Metrics and Penalty Dispute

Numéro de cause ATA/371/2006

Autorité / Tribunal Cour de Justice (Cour civile) · Chambre administrative

Juridiction

Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)

Date de la décision 2006-06-29

Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A dispute arose concerning contractual provisions related to performance metrics and associated penalties, specifically involving clauses regarding delivery schedules and product specifications which allegedly led to financial detriment for one party. The court reasoned that the language in the governing agreements, when read in its entirety and in context with the established course of dealing between the parties, clearly delineated the conditions under which penalties were applicable, ultimately finding that the plaintiff failed to establish a material breach by the defendant that triggered the stipulated remedies, thus upholding the contractual allocation of risk.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contractual Performance Metrics and Penalty Dispute: The court reasoned that the language in the governing agreements, when read in its entirety and in context with the established course of dealing between the parties, clearly delineated the conditions under which penalties were applicable, ultimately finding that the plaintiff failed to establish a material breach by the defendant that triggered the stipulated remedies, thus upholding the contractual allocation of risk.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA

clause pénale cahier des charges qualification du contrat dispositions financières responsabilité de l'entrepreneur différend commercial

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited to order the appellant to pay the costs of the federal procedure.

Généré par l'IA

Breach of Contract Based on Failure to Meet Performance Metrics

Breach of Contract for Failure to Meet Performance Metrics

Contractual Performance Metrics and Liquidated Damages

Contractual Interpretation and Breach of Performance Metrics

Contract Interpretation Dispute Over Performance Metric Calculation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited to order the appellant to pay the costs of the federal procedure.

Texte complet

!

"#$%"#%"&#'( " '!!%))%"

'!" %# !"#! $%&'

'

+

"()*"

$$'/0$(++.1'22$'1 3$"45 1 6%#$ 0 2$ '4&7

&'!'$8888883$"45!9888888'' 6%0$ .:$(++.;1 $<' =7

&'$' $ $'<122 $2=$' 7

&'1 '$ $ $0(+:$(++.7

'$ 5

# ' > $ .. $ 0$ '$ ' 0$$ $& ?( 0@?A-B3 " B?+6%'22 $2;0'$#> '$ #$ $$$' #>$ ''>C $'''@ '7

#'>$(0D0$'$ $'% $@0$$ $2 $ >22 $2 ; 0 ' $ ' $ D ' E&0 0 '#>$ D @$' >F''7

#>; > $ (? $ 0$ % > '$ >'22$ ' #D ''0'&$$'C$E @'$G 7

#0' ''$ >$>E$ > '$ 'E$ '>:$$ $'0$$ $&3 9(?9( 67

# $'$ $' $ $E'$' 0$$ $&%'H$ %';> @$0 2$ 7

#1$ >F $ 0$ >4 $ @ $ 0 '&$$' ";#$ $;> @$0 2$ 3 )(.+)(++.(?0$(++.7 )-B/)(++B?/0@(++B67

#1&$E '00 #D 0 '&$$'% 0 < $ $' 122 $2= ' ' '$ D : ' 0' $2$& 5

#12$E'$'$2'7

# 0$4 2$ 'H$@ :$ ' $

3 )(.+)(++.$ 7 !)(?)(++B?A&$(++B7 )((.)(++/?.&$ (++/7 ).-B)(++*?- 0@(++*79IJ <''E$H!H0 $0 K E&2H K E'L= $ 0 '&$'$ '$&$%0$$ $& %?AA,%9(.B67

)(+,-)(++. "*)*"

# 0 $0 $' $$ ' E0 'H$@ :$ 3 M ?(* *A '$9 * 9 /?7 M ??A B+* '$9( * 9 B+B"B+.7 '' 99 M (- :$ ?AAB 97 )-.,)(++//'&0@(++/ $$'$ 67

# 1E$ 1 0'F $' '@ '$% $@ # '' " H " $ E $' 1 0'F $$ ; '

3 ),A+)(++(?+0@(++( ).,,)?AAA?.'&0@?AAA67

#1' $ 4 ' ' ' &'$ 0 '&$$'#1$'$ '@ $2'7

#1$??'G (++. $0 $;1 ' 0$2'7

: #D 0'&$$' #1 &@7

$0 $ $??'G (++.;1'22$'1 ' 0$ 2'7

$ #1$1 N10'0 7

&' 2$':#1;'$ :E2'7

'00$# $$'% '$% ; ! "# ! $% &' ' $$#>;1'22$'> 9

$ $@0$$ $25 M9FH4

'$'2'0 $$' '00$#C $9

4&% E22$45

)(+,-)(++.