Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATA/37/2006 • CJ GE ATA/37/2006 Généré par l'IA

Statutory Damages Calculation Interpretation

Numéro de cause ATA/37/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The litigation concerns a dispute over the interpretation and application of statutory provisions governing liability for certain commercial transactions, specifically involving the calculation of damages under multiple applicable clauses. The court reasoned that the relevant statutory scheme mandated that when multiple provisions define the measure of damages, the provision yielding the greater recovery for the injured party must be applied, as the legislative intent was to provide the maximum protection to the protected class, and therefore affirmed the lower court's decision applying the more favorable damages calculation method.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Statutory Damages Calculation Interpretation: The court reasoned that the relevant statutory scheme mandated that when multiple provisions define the measure of damages, the provision yielding the greater recovery for the injured party must be applied, as the legislative intent was to provide the maximum protection to the protected class, and therefore affirmed the lower court's decision applying the more favorable damages calculation method.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
calcul du dommage contentieux commercial violation de normes protectrices interprétation du contrat responsabilité de l'assuré hypothèque légale du vendeur d'immeuble

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision governs the allocation of judicial costs, as applied in order 6.
Généré par l'IA
A/227/2004
Statutory Interpretation of Damage Calculation Formulas
A/1939/2004
Statutory Interpretation and Damages in Commercial Liability
A/5001/2007
Statutory Interpretation of Monetary Obligation Calculation
A/652/2007
Breach of Contract Damages Calculation: Lost Profits and Statutory Interpretation
A/5/2007
Statutory Damages Calculation Aggregation Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision governs the allocation of judicial costs, as applied in order 6.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

        

        

 

   

 !"#$







% &"#$ 

 

 ' (()    





     !"#$!

 

&)  *+  ,  +  -+  &$ . "((/ 0 -- 1  2 -+3  1+ 4 0  5 61+   !,2#3758  6 94 :;&<='(()!)0+11>?? +&@A()

")   $ B+ "(($5 *) ,  ?-?  1 0+  91- 3+ +91C+!- 3DE)?++7 ?5-3   2 F5 ? -+71  &@'%  &@'<5  + 7+  9  B+) 7+ - +?1 6-  7 911+6  0 114)?+6G19)

/)   B?1- ?++"."(($51+FH- +2 4-+3915+ :;<=A"()!- 5?+-? + 8 4  -+3 -  @(I  91  + 4  1J1 -? +    8  ?+ +F? +  4 :; %='(()!  -+3 -   C+11>  +   &@<<!

&@A(E4 :;%='$%)!-+3- C+11> + &@A&!&@A$E)

%)  +?++??F+ 1?  ?1+"(> "(($)

$)     ?  &@ >  "(($   ? 4  5 *) ,       ?++ - ?+?) , 91  0?+ -  6+2 ?+>? ?- 51+?+?9 + H6G 7+   -+>++?  7+   F)  ?+ B  4  6 6 0 911+6 7+ 7?1- 3 7+0 ) ++437?+-+FF++- 9 ) - 37+  -8?8 F ++F5++ + :;$(()!- 1+- 7+7 )

      1+ 0 - ?+?  +> 1++ +F  "' 71>  "(($)

<)    ?-  &/ B7+  "((<5   0 --?   5  910+? ?-7J 619? ++78  - -+3- )

( 

&)   B?  1- + 7  B +++ 1-?5     7>C )$< + = 9++B+++ ""71> &@%&! ! "($K  )&A )$5<%)" </ )& +)+ - ?  1++ +7&"-1> &@'$! ! $&(E)

#%&'%#"(($ !/#$!

")   +  - J  1+  >??F+ = +  91 +  8 +6 91+F1 - 5?9 4 74 F 5+?697911+? 2- ?+  +7?+1B C )/@ )&+9??  91

- ++  &A71> "(((5 ?7+9  &&B7+ "((&!!%($E)

  =+? /   +-++ - ?+ H  + =  ? 1+  ++ 2H  +    + 4  +5 ++ H    !+)

   7   = + "" +? &     391 =2?+   + 9??     91   - +  +   "% . &@@"C ! %($)(&E =+  91  - - J   ? 2 +  H+5 - 37+ ?? H+5B+F+-H=?697911+ ? 2- ?+ +7?+1B - 2)

/)  ,0 +/@ +?"5+ =+11>1+4 -?91J 1+>??F+=+1J1 ++5 -   H  91 H=+ - ?- 2  1 F+2? - = +/@5=!4!+ H91+J 9 ??- = )

   8     ? ++H  91 +7  -  2  1 1+   +11> 1+ 4  +5 1-   0?   +0+11>C )/@)/E)

  >+-++0?7+ H0+91 75  + 14F++?+54F+ -+18  -?7?  +  91 22 C #%&&#&@@@  < B+ &@@@   B +- +?E)

%)  0-3591  0?->7+?5+ 8+ 021+ 0+-J 9 ??+-++- ?+?)

$)   +> 1++ +F   1+ F+ =+  F+ 1  

- +H+4++ ++H1+3 - +28      375 18 ?H -  - 1  =-- ?+   +1++    8     - +7?  2    ->+ C #<%'#"(($%> "(($ ?F? +?E)

  ++591-J 9 ?? H8 - -+3?- 8  18 -  -+3  @( I  91 1-   1J1 1>   -+3   + 4  1J1 ?-H C #<%'#"(($ - ?+?   ?F?  +?E)



#%&'%#"(($ !%#$!

  ,++H0 ,  +7+78 437 ?>+  1+ "(($5 + -- L H -   91 4 8  +>   +  &@<<&@A(511+51- "-+31+5@(I 8 - -+3  6+FF 4 :; $0&(()!-  -- 1 2-+3 :;%=A&<)!- -- 1 +-+35+ :;%=@(')! - -- 12-+31+),09+0+11> +  &@A&  &@A$5  8    6+FF  -+71 4 :; $=&(()! - 2-+3 :;%='(()!-  +-+35+ :;%=@$()!-  2 -+3  1+ C +7  8  4 375 1+ "(($5 > &)()& -9&@!"("/!"%E)

  18 - -+3  0?374 :;<0A"()!  ++ >+ -? +  4  ?F?  1+?)  5 0-- 1  -J 619?) +91-J  8?)

<)    +++J  B?)

  >        0+  ++95 +    - 1+ 0?1146 9  57++F++3 +FF++C )'A  E) MMMMM

' (      

*+,%$-#.

?  7>  + B?/(71> "(($- *+ ,  ?++  ?1++ +91"(> "(($K

,% .

 BK

+H0+0-- N0?11K

11+H  - ?  J 4 *+  , ++ H=4  + +  91)

,+?9D *1785- ?+5*)863 5*1: +5*) 6?+*15 B9)



#%&'%#"(($ !$#$!

1 +>1++ +FD

9 FF+3 !B +B)D  7+!- ?+D     *) + )78  

-+F 1 J??11+H?2- +)

 375  9 FF+3 D           

#%&'%#"(($