Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATA/369/2006 • CJ GE ATA/369/2006 Généré par l'IA

Agreement Voidability Due to Material Financial Non-Disclosure

Numéro de cause ATA/369/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellate court reviewed a dispute regarding the validity of an agreement where one party claimed the other breached by failing to disclose pertinent financial information necessary for the agreement's purpose, resulting in substantial financial loss upon discovery. The court reasoned that the claimed breach constituted a material misrepresentation or omission, as the undisclosed facts were essential to the bargain's foundation and the aggrieved party relied reasonably on the available information. Consequently, the court affirmed the lower tribunal's finding that the agreement was voidable due to the fraudulent inducement stemming from the significant non-disclosure.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Agreement Voidability Due to Material Financial Non-Disclosure: The court reasoned that the claimed breach constituted a material misrepresentation or omission, as the undisclosed facts were essential to the bargain's foundation and the aggrieved party relied reasonably on the available information. Consequently, the court affirmed the lower tribunal's finding that the agreement was voidable due to the fraudulent inducement stemming from the significant non-disclosure.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
déclaration de la situation financière consentement et validité au fond validité du contrat dol principal perte financière violation de la bonne foi

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied for the allocation of costs related to the proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/2328/2003
Misrepresentation and Contract Voidability Based on Lack of Justifiable Reliance
A/3543/2006
Appellate Review of Financial Misrepresentation and Contract Breach Dismissal Based on Disclosure Terms
A/1953/2004
Contract Validity Due to Misrepresentation and Lack of Consideration
A/255/2005
Misrepresentation Voids Contractual Assent
A/2978/2006
Contract Validity Dispute and Affirmation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied for the allocation of costs related to the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

         

        

 



        

 !

"#$%"#%"&#'( " '!!%))%" 





**$% ++++++ 



        



     !"# 

 ())$*+)!''%,),,() )-+)))  -..)    ) / 01 ).)2 3 4+ 05555556 +)))( 3 786 .))  8)  ) .+))  - 0 ,)$9$*&*6)+)))86())-)(( :)(68;2,:67$<)!''%=

 8>()),()(((((:();=

 8   )<(  $# <) !''% , 4+ 0555555   ()) ,()( , >   3  > -.. ,). ) ( 3  ()) >(=

 8  (+))  !# <) !''%   )  28)  +,)/  1+)))-..,).=

)(?

 >  @) %% )( ,+)   )   ,( +)))8  $!,+;$*&A/   A$'16..,).3+)>@)(>) ,)())>(@)(@:();=

 >@)(!+B+),))6 );+))).,) @.. ,). 3  +   ,)   )(B  28+ +( >-)(B,;),(,(@C,,=

 >-3   @) !$ )( ,+)  6 @)( , @..)   >B+,8)):)2;)9(=

 >+(,,()@)@2)@)((2) @<)))+)))8/D!$D! 1=

 >),)))((,)2((),( +)))86,E,)6(3@(;)+.)=

 >>B8B<(6)@C,)(+)@,7) ; ) + ,8)) ,   3   >)  () 3 @(;)+.)=

 >   +  ()  ); +))). - 3 -))+()8)+,(:)(7$<)!''%=

 >->B@,,;<@)@..,).6+)8)3 >()  <))) )) @  + ,8))  3 )- 03,C,),())=

"!$%&"!''% #"# 

 >   +  8)) ,  +))  -(  .)  3  82 -)(B +,+)6  ,()(  -)( ))+(   8;))( -(,+)=

 >@)7,E);(,<),/ F$!##*)D# ,DG$= F$$*A'#)D!#,DA'A A'%=D,D F !&<) $AD= "$"!''%G<8)!''%(.D)(1=

 >-(>6+))-..,).6 )(++++,8))6<(D

         

<++,8))=

(8.),(<>-3)<2(.=

++)>  ,( ())6  ,)6 3 4+ 0555555 )) >@3 -..) )D

  ,() );+))).?     FDCE7 

,).+())((++)>(:,)D

 786  2..)7?         

"!$%&"!''%