Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATA/339/2006 • CJ GE ATA/339/2006 Généré par l'IA

Marital Asset Division and Issue Preclusion on Military Retirement Benefits

Numéro de cause ATA/339/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court addressed the proper interpretation of an order related to the division of assets in a marital dissolution, specifically concerning the valuation and distribution of military retirement benefits accrued during the marriage. The court reasoned that the previous order, which directed the division of the present value of the accrued retirement benefits, constituted a final adjudication of the parties' rights to those benefits under governing state law concerning marital property, and thus, the subsequent attempt by one party to modify the method of payment or value was barred by the doctrine of issue preclusion, as the issue had been previously litigated and decided.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Marital Asset Division and Issue Preclusion on Military Retirement Benefits: The court reasoned that the previous order, which directed the division of the present value of the accrued retirement benefits, constituted a final adjudication of the parties' rights to those benefits under governing state law concerning marital property, and thus, the subsequent attempt by one party to modify the method of payment or value was barred by the doctrine of issue preclusion, as the issue had been previously litigated and decided.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
dissolution du mariage mise à la retraite partage de la propriété partage de la rente pour couple paiement des prestations biens étatiques

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

         

        

 



      

  

!"#$$#%!!&# !$ 





''(#))))))

#%

))))))  !"#!"$%&" 

" 

    *      



     '()*'

   " . /   *- 0. (--1  !0 222222     ".  222222 3.'45  ". 6 "   .."  78 0. (--1   0   9""0.       3.'45   0 6%  : ". "";   "%  .#  9<". 9:".  ."  .# = 222222>% ?222222 @ 4&% .A.# @!02222220 BC*D(--E'F

+, !-"' %.

 GA0 .  ;.0  A.:@-(<-- .:0".0".% . ."  9 . 87 . 7      ".     ."%  ;.   ;"." 9<;#0 780;7HI83BJ((76F

 G  "  "  ;0  @   .  ."  9AA  .A% &  G  .."  K. %  A. %  A0   9 ;.0 % .'.   "& (*<@-+<--F

 G 71/.(--1% 0 9 ""@0 .'  ."9AA .A%0"L". .".0.  ." 9<".F

 G9&<%9 ". . .0G.@GM %9#. .0  90. .#.F

 G9@   9 . 11 .   ".   " 0..  .&  7(  0; 7HI+ 3  J  + 7-6%  "  AA  .A% @ 0". G 9 ".  . .09. ""9: ."..". .#."";  "F

 G"9.(0M0.". ."% .;0..  .A  .  9AA  .A @  0    . "   . M  "  #&0  0% "  G9. M ;." 9N""F

 G"/.%.N.9AA  . M ;.  .&/%  .G9 ".  . ."0 <4 "3 )(++)(--,7I"&0;(--*  )+8)(--*7*0(--*6F

 G 9. M  .&   " %    ""0.G% @ "&". :".  "  ;.0  '@  : <  0 .   .0"  %  &  < 9"& 9 ;.0 F

 G9. M ;. .:;.G. M "  F

 G .; .G90 .G/@ ""%. &  .."  .   .; 0..  .A  78 " "; (--+

3 )1I8)(--+6    9   " &.   0M0 . .0%  G.  ."0;;0 &".&"F

)*++,)(--+ '*)*'

 G9 &   G. 4%  .   .; 0..  .A /   0   .  ."  9AA  .A% &  G   0   /..0 A.:9<A0 @:<0 .%G.0  . "0   GA. . M " F

           

/ GM  .  ."DAA .AF

&" A."/G9@". /#A"F

"00.G .."%".%@!"#!"$%&" "  ..GD 0 D""0.  E

  .  .;0..  .A5     CEN<4 

"."A"0 .." "00.G: .E

 4&%  #AA.45         

)*++,)(--+