Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATA/338/2006 • CJ GE ATA/338/2006 Généré par l'IA

Public Records Access vs. Employee Privacy in Internal Affairs Investigation

Numéro de cause ATA/338/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party sought enforcement of a statutory right to inspect records, challenging a ruling that denied access to documents related to a governmental entity's internal affairs, particularly concerning employee conduct and personnel matters. The court reasoned that while the statute generally favors public access to governmental records, the specific records sought fell under an exemption designed to protect ongoing investigations and the privacy interests of employees, concluding that the public interest in disclosure was outweighed by the need to preserve the integrity of internal administrative processes and individual confidentiality.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Public Records Access vs. Employee Privacy in Internal Affairs Investigation: The court reasoned that while the statute generally favors public access to governmental records, the specific records sought fell under an exemption designed to protect ongoing investigations and the privacy interests of employees, concluding that the public interest in disclosure was outweighed by the need to preserve the integrity of internal administrative processes and individual confidentiality.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
sphère privée accès aux documents enquête administrative exécution prétention légale accès aux actes du contribuable

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article governs the allocation of court costs, which was explicitly applied in the final order.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

         

        

 



        

 

!"#$$#%!!&# !$ 







 ''(#))))))  !"#" $%#&      &          *      



     '()*'

   ""& "   #"   &" "&      / 0&   !$111111%""& +23"(--.$"& "4"/0" +53" (--./+,6--7"89

 #"4 "&/&"  "&%:" :&"& ;6:<$  +,$:+=>,7?'((+8&6/0" %'"0@    06  4$  < / (56--   @  & $$  &<"  "$ "&$" &" "&= +-3"(--.A$"0"  " $"&&" "&<$& B# 9

 #0$ ?C50---D'"4"</!$111111 0&4$  0 :"$  & +- 3& /  "  +. 3" (--. / +,6--%   ""&    E &"&&:  &9

 #&&<44 ":$""  "4+.3"(--./->6*- !$111111% A'"&"" :$  "  "&044  "4  &  "$"" $  / 0& &" 0 " $ " & &$ &<$  "&9

 #  $""&  &" "  &  #" " "$ # 0& &" 0"3&$F$/+(6--& $"$044 "49

 #  &:# "&    "G &"    "  0 &"  " "$ &"< "  "&"4 "&<9

    

 B& ; " .. " $"   &"   & $""  "#  +(  $:+=>27 ' 2+-8%&44 "4%/$&"A0 &" A" "  ""& A0" &&0E "&&&:  &D   0"( "&" "&% ":$""  "4  " 044 "4/ $ "& " F & <#$ $%&A0" F  :"& 0@&&9

 0" F  "#   &  / 0& &"  044  "4   $"4 D  4$ & :"$ &"E3&% $"G: %   /"3" "D

  0"#% 0" F  :"      &"     A""  :"A    "$&  %$""44" /3 "4"%0  &"%$" "&& "&9

 #; "2G<$  ":$""  "4*- $:(--*9



)(+,()(--. '*)*'

         

&"+','-,#(# %H

 " ;44 "4&9

!",#$. H

& &"/& "+53" (--./$"" &&$ &&9

#& 4"&3A0/&" 3<4&9

&$$"A ""&%&"  &"%/!"#" $%#&    &  "" A;  $   ;&&$"      % #"   &" "&   D

  D&D"  ":$""  "4 CD@6GH  D?"    3<< 

&"&4&$ ""& &$$"AE "D

 G#%  <44"GH         

)(+,()(--.