Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATA/335/2006 • CJ GE ATA/335/2006 Généré par l'IA

Claimant's Failure to Meet Statutory Filing Deadline for Extension of Time

Numéro de cause ATA/335/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party sought review of a judgment affirming a decision that disallowed a claim for an extension of time to file a response to an administrative action, asserting that the statutory period for filing had expired before the claim was submitted and that the administrative decision was not a formal document that required service to trigger the filing deadline. The court reasoned that the relevant statute mandated filing within a specific period following a specified event, and the claimant failed to meet this deadline, further determining that the administrative action taken was sufficient to commence the statutory clock, regardless of whether it was a formally served document, thereby affirming the lower court's dismissal.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 64 LTF; Claimant's Failure to Meet Statutory Filing Deadline for Extension of Time: The court reasoned that the relevant statute mandated filing within a specific period following a specified event, and the claimant failed to meet this deadline, further determining that the administrative action taken was sufficient to commence the statutory clock, regardless of whether it was a formally served document, thereby affirming the lower court's dismissal.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
délai légal moment du dépôt délai de contrôle licenciement administratif retard injustifié forclusion pour tardiveté

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied for the allocation of court costs.

Art. 64 LTF

Applied for the allocation of legal aid.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

        

      

 

  









  !"#$$$$$$ 



   





     !"# 

%

$(  )$$*+!&&',-.+.,-+!&/)//+0  +1 /+++2  /+ -+/    3/ 4555555 .++*+6**/-+ +/+7+ -89:  ;0!%1!&&#(

  6++ < + =  ) *+ // /-.  +/-+-6>)>-+   -  = +  +?/ 6.+ ?/ ,-+/.(

   @+++  .  /+ =  A?  6+..  .//  BC%&&( /)//=:  ( +/+. 6...(

!(   !D *+ !&&'0 3/ 4555555  .  +1 /+++2  +  >  ++>  - *+  /< 2++ + 6.?+ .+-+6)-.+.0++>+-+ >6*A>*+-< BC%&&( 6.//(

% 

$(  : 6+ ED +. #   +   -. /+++*  $!-/1 $FE% 7    % $&;0  .// ). -  @+++ /+++*-*2+61@6./+.+@ 8+2++.++( 6-80+!D*+!&&'0+. //./+0...-./-+(

!(   @+++ /+++*    2+  -.   .//0 2/./  -++-   --++. 7( ED ( $  G ;( 6+ !  8?/   2+0 .//  +/+.  -./+++*G&@+$FE'7 %$&(&GH8?/;+-> 6.// 6,8 -0  8? ?..  2 + 6 /- ,++  -.  +22+. -++80 BC $&I&&&( 

7 "DE'"!&&%!!*/1!&&%J "DEG"!&&#$F1!&&#;(

G(  :@+- +12..@+++.0 .+++1,/+8.-I-=)/+*.0I+.  - + +. -  -++- ?..  I+++  I1++

7 C$$#  GG! +( !1 -( GG#0 $$$  $ -( $ !J "GD'"$FFE  $' @+ $FFEJ "$''"$FFE  !# / $FFEJ "%$E"$FFD  !' K $FFDJ

"$%##"!&&' G"# 

"#D!"$FFD'K$FFD;( ,-++->+*+I) --. * .?/  /+8  2+  A+  I.//

7 "%&&"!&&!!FK!&&!;(

   0./</+L*@+<-+/ /1.0  --+ 6 .// =  A? .+ @+2+.   -++-( .?=6+*+..-<.0/0-*+?+8/  /,+// ++0 6--M - 1++( 2+0 +  ./ /++../++2++8068?->6 +6+-+.6>+6.//(

#(  .>0 ./+@.(:0>+/10 2+-/.=.//--.-.0 @+-+1.7 "%E!"!&&%G&K!&&%;(

 NNNNN

  %  %  

&' ()*!"+

.*1./++@.!E*+!&&'-3/4555555 .++ +1/+++2$$*+!&&'J

()+

@J

+>I+I--OI.//J

//+>-.)=3/4555555(

:+.?9 3(<A80-.+03/*<B+03( A.+03/0 @?(







"$%##"!&&' #"# 

/ +1/+++29

?22+8 @+9  -.+9     (+ :+?+ C(<A8  

-+2/)..//+>.,-+(

 8*0  ?22+89           

"$%##"!&&'