ATA/32/2006 • CJ GE ATA/32/2006 Généré par l'IA

Validity of Rights Assignment in Related Agreements

Numéro de cause ATA/32/2006

Autorité / Tribunal Cour de Justice (Cour civile) · Chambre administrative

Juridiction

Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)

Date de la décision 2006-01-24

Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)

Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute centered on whether a purported assignment of rights was effective, particularly concerning a set of related agreements spanning several years. The court reasoned that the language in the relevant assignment documents clearly evidenced an intent to transfer the rights in question, despite subsequent actions or ambiguities in related instruments. The court found that the assignment was validly executed and that the assignee possessed the requisite rights, consequently affirming the lower court's determination regarding the enforceability of those rights against the opposing party.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Validity of Rights Assignment in Related Agreements: The court reasoned that the language in the relevant assignment documents clearly evidenced an intent to transfer the rights in question, despite subsequent actions or ambiguities in related instruments. The court found that the assignment was validly executed and that the assignee possessed the requisite rights, consequently affirming the lower court's determination regarding the enforceability of those rights against the opposing party.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA

cessionnaire validité de cession de créance droits et obligations contractuels clause d'effectivité jouissance des droits procuration valable

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article was cited in the dispositive concerning the allocation of costs.

Généré par l'IA

Validity of Judgment Assignment Based on Underlying Contract

Contractual Assignment Validity and Notice Dispute

Property Right Agreement Validity Affirmed

Contractual Assignment Validity and Statutory Compliance

Contractual Assignment Validity Without Consent

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article was cited in the dispositive concerning the allocation of costs.

Texte complet

!"#

$ %&$$$& &'()*&

+,%, & ,& &- & &&)) !! "#$%& && &- &.& $&/$&&& &&$,

'()*'

&

+/ ,0(..*%123&2442252' 671 8 02! 344!9&2322&26& 52' 67 &2 3228 3! 22 6& 52'

67 3! 8% : 2 3; 2< &!;2 2! < 22/

!2!242<!(.!90(..*%=++;..% 944 &2322/

(/ 2 ! ! 44 !2 29 2% 3 2 2 22&2 > ? 2 % "< / @A 52'

67222&28!02=$0;?% 2!!"24?/ /%#:=26B=''/

C/ +(&2(..-%9;!42 3:222 &!;2 2! < 22 !! DB! = 2!! "24 ?/ /

*/ &2 6& 249! 2 22&2 !22 +C &2(..-/

-/ !(+&2(..-%26!22 6 2092224/

0%:3&2E!22 0&42 / &2 D23&2 2:!9 2 322 2 922 % 22% &2 ;! > 90 :2 F2G < 9 &2B% E @1 -.3.../' ;FG 26A/

222&23 22%322:!9# &3 :220!32344 24/

H/ "24?/ /3 !:!2(I92 (..-/ % 2 42 ! % = : 2'2 2 !! 2&0%4232H-2!+(2 !9222&+( 90+J,-5 ' -+.8/

I/ +.D2(..-%&23! D29 ! /

)+(,-)(..- 'C)*'

,/ &2 322 3! 22B2< & "24?/ / 2&9C.D2*D2(..-/

J/ 2 22&2 ! 2:! ++ D2 (..-% !2&23! 244! 2/

+./ &23! 2!2222 2:++K(..-/

++/ "24?/ /429L9++K(..-/

+(/ ?:2%!!B!=DB/

&,

+/ / ?32H-2! 92 %32% 2 32&022!% !2B2 !22 :! 2 5 )+IC)(..*(9(..*M )-(H)(...(JK(...8/

0/ 20!!9932DB%92 9;! 02% :3 992 0 = 2&: B9 ;2: 22: 992% 2% 9# & 42 26% !2 2&05 )IJ-)(..-((&90(..-8/

D2 & 29 22 3 6/ 44% 3 2 2 322: 9# &/ 3B92 !& ! N 6 &B !9 9 :2 2 22 22 !B2 2 9;! 02 2 !! &2! < &2 D2/ 2%3&62&0/

(/ !99 @1 +3-../' 92 = ;B % :2 90/ 292! ! @1+3.../' ! = "24 ?/ /% :2 02 B2 / ! 3292! &2322&26&%2=3! 22 6&%<# !!2<&23&5/,I 8/ OOOOO

)+(,-)(..- '*)*'

%$&, &

!2&02D!(+&2(..- ? 2 %"< /@%!22D2&2322&2 6&3 ! 226&+C&2(..-M

9=;B!99 @1+3-../'M

292! ! @1 +3.../' = "24 ?/ /% = ;B M

992: !L= ? 2 %"< /@%22:3&2 322&26&%=3! 226&= "#$%&"24?/ /

?2!B7 "9&#% !2%"/#;6%"9@2%"/ ;!2%"9% DB/

9 20922247

B4426'D2D/7 &2' !27 "/ 2 /&#

249L!!992:!< 2/

6&% B44267

)+(,-)(..-