Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATA/317/2005 • CJ GE ATA/317/2005 Généré par l'IA

Administrative Fee Assessment Challenge Upheld on Due Process Grounds

Numéro de cause ATA/317/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant challenged an assessment regarding an administrative fee, arguing the fee structure was unduly retroactive and vague, thereby violating due process by failing to provide clear notice of the obligation. The court held that the administrative fee statute, as applied, was sufficiently clear and provided adequate notice through regulatory guidance and historical practice, even if the statute itself was broad, thus affirming the assessment because the application was not shown to be impermissibly retroactive or so vague as to prevent compliance.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Administrative Fee Assessment Challenge Upheld on Due Process Grounds: The court held that the administrative fee statute, as applied, was sufficiently clear and provided adequate notice through regulatory guidance and historical practice, even if the statute itself was broad, thus affirming the assessment because the application was not shown to be impermissibly retroactive or so vague as to prevent compliance.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
émolument administratif moyens invocables fixation des honoraires demande adressée à l'autorité fixation de l'amende réclamation administrative préalable

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision governs the allocation of court costs, as explicitly ordered in the final dispositive.
Généré par l'IA
A/2064/2007
Assessment Challenge Regarding Due Process
A/1050/2021
Administrative Fee Regulation Legality Challenge Upheld
cause/No/A/1361/1995
Fee Assessment Challenge Rejected
A/2818/2006
Fee Validity Challenge Based on Uniform Assessment Structure
A/158/2002
Fee Assessment Challenge Upheld Despite Claim of Disproportionality

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision governs the allocation of court costs, as explicitly ordered in the final dispositive.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

        

        

  

    

 !

"#$%$&' ()





()% $  !  "#$%&" 

" 

+ , ++ -- ++ + ,. - 





     '()*'

+ 

./  !"#  000000000%   .1*2% "3### 000000000% .(,* 4&%   # #53#"#"&6#73" #&74& 2," "8.19+/

(/  :"""#; "3"8## "# &# "3"8#    &#< #" =#'4> : ?%  "        3 #4  # #"" #4%7&"# # 3##@3"#""*A&# .11-"&"#"#   ;8# /

2/  (1"&38(,,+7.B6*,%;# ## &"# ;&  63%# #"!#6':& %"C;#; 3 ;"  #"#  7  # " D7 <<   <  # /  # "  6    6   ;  &  #'3E3/     <43  8/

+/  &#    :  7 "#  "8& #"% !/ 000000000 ;  "  A# C## # "6/#&"C8"#"A#" #";&6#73" /@F# "A#"3G& #&#  A"#A#3 &"&6# "# &#; #  # #C "   "<  ;/  &#  8"# C" ##3   " &6#/

*/  ##".+D&#(,,*%: ? #3#"# !/000000000 C 3"#%# #"5 #.B#2     "# A   # #" " #4  .1 38 .1*- =  ' :9+./,.?/  :     C ;#   D #A##    8"# "A#" ;     C    #" ; "3"8##  ; #   8" "3  H  3"#A&#.11-;  / "3   ;38  #" % ; "#  ""F#   3 C# ; #   3##33</

B/  !/000000000## #83##  #A; ""  ##"# % (2A&#(,,*/;"  A# C##  # "6%3##@#CC;#"# &"#<6;&  63%"CA#"#   #  ""/ #&# &6#7 CC#@34 # /&# &" " "  #"7# #"% 3# # ;&#   &  # " <<   <%    # "#    6%C## # 3C&6# "& 7"# ;   3"  7#C&# E  #&#/

  " 7 #" # 7@3"#/

)+,-)(,,* '2)*'

9/     #  "3 #" "  (, &# (,,*% !/000000000# @# #" "#"/

  : # ##" #%"#< C;#A## &  &#  "C  #   # "%  "I  <<   < " <% # D/

-/   #4"#C!/000000000""3# "#3#: +3(,,*/

+ - 

./   D   3  # &   D## #" "3  %  "   &8= /*B "#5"<# #"D###(("&38.1+.' ' (,*J /B2/. //"#"3##  #&.(  38.1-*' ' *.,?/

(/   # #"  "3  "#  # "# <#   A"3    =(,,(%/(9B9J" /(9-.?% #  <#4<&#< 3"3 ;#A #"/

2/ " A## @# " &6= /22/.  ?/

  & <"# "%" #&  ##4  %  8"#% 5E  " #  #"#  @ # " C#  "& D7<"5K<< = /22/( ?/

+/   &"#    ##4 #3" @  "3"8##  75"6 5 < " # "    3   #   #  "AA    </ : &#" #" " #  ##  A  5 <&#   # = )*-()(,,+  B D#  (,,+   A/ # /?/    5 # B  5""4<# #"" #4.2"&38.1B(= ' :9+./..?%&#<#.D#.11+%A""&"# "   "3"8## #"# @<" C# 7#/

*/   #   &"    &"#    #"  #  #'

%  "   &#"  #"# #" # / : A   #  E  3"##"# #"# #" C## ;E  "&/  #  #   AA  ;E  ;    &#<#  7 ;"6  <  # C# #" #  C"I #;&# 8" &##8##    "# %    C 3E3  "3" 3  #C   "# E "67; "3"8## C### " 3  &"#'7/  #83##  #A"#4"C5 78""# C:  A"3# #<#5 #.B#2 /

)+,-)(,,* '+)*'

B/      #    A#@ "  #" /    5 3"#  3##33= /.9/ / ?/

  #& A  "#&  E  #  "# #"% " 33   <&#  "8D #&   8D #&   A %      5#  ## C  8"# "A#" = / 22 / (  J L .,- 8 (*1J / ::M)/ : % "## #"" #4%"33 #%.11B%/(.-J!/  %#&  # 3#"#%.1-(%/.--?/  @3%  "C  5#A #" "33#  #  &"#  #A ##& = L .19- / (--?/  %   5  #     #85E A#@'73##33<%3E3"C5#  8"  = L.1-./*,?/

  "C5 #  &#  &  # " <<   <  # 7# 3 5&"# E & <% 68# 3 #A#<&#C 7#@3"#"8"#"A#"  538#" = )B2()(,,+*"N (,,+ A # ?/

9/   4%: "" # 5C  3"#%C# # "3 7A"#A "33#OC#3 ;  "  '##C;88"#"A#"#"5 3#"#/

   "C%  ##"  5 "# %  " "#  "A"3 7  D#%# E # #C "A#3/

-/  ""D /

   ;#  # #<%  3"3   $L 2,,/'  3# 7  6<  " %C#"38= /-9 ?/ PPPPP

/  +- 0 +    

1!2(#$3

 &8  " # D   (2 A&# (,,*  !"#  000000000 " ##"&# "3"8# &#< #".+D&#(,,*#  # "3#"#"C 3"#J



)+,-)(,,* '*)*'

2()3

D J

3 76<" 3"3  $L2,,/'J

#  C% "A"33  @  # 19   #&    "# A 5"<# #" D###% E  E " %&"#""# 3##  #A%   D"4" #A# #"%&  #8AJ33"#" "#  ##C  "#"% 3" #A   3"K  &   "   #<   "  "  " 3 #J # "#  E    "# @3#  3"#  #8 A% .,,,  .+J    E     #4  "#"  " %#&"C"333"K&%"#& E D"# 75&"#J

"33#C    E  7 !  "# $% &"   "  ## C5 &# "3"8# &#< #" 75"AA#A" 7/

:#< > !3"&K%# %!!/K64% 6#%D</

"3 #83##  #A>

<AA#4'D# >  &#'# >     /#"':#<#  /"&K   

"#"A"3 E  "33#C@ #/

 4&%  <AA#4>           

)+,-)(,,*