Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATA/313/2008 • CJ GE ATA/313/2008 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Insufficient Procedural Grounds

Numéro de cause ATA/313/2008
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appeal concerned a decision made by a lower administrative court, though the specific subject matter of the initial dispute is not detailed in the provided summary text. The higher court declared the appeal inadmissible because the procedural grounds upon which the appellant sought review were not sufficiently established or did not meet the legal requirements for the appellate body to consider the merits of the case.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 93 al. 1 let. a LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Insufficient Procedural Grounds: The higher court declared the appeal inadmissible because the procedural grounds upon which the appellant sought review were not sufficiently established or did not meet the legal requirements for the appellate body to consider the merits of the case.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
motif de révision condition de recevabilité recours contre décision de renvoi motif légal d'exclusion objet du litige demande adressée à l'autorité

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 93 al. 1 let. a LTF
The appeal was declared inadmissible because it was directed against a non-appealable decision (interlocutory decision).
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The appellant was ordered to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/3513/2014
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Procedural Defect
C/12000/2020
Appeal Inadmissibility for Lack of Substantive Grounds
C/16673/2019
Appeal Inadmissibility for Lack of Legal Grounds
C/23933/2019
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Procedural Deficiency
C/27267/2017
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Lack of Specific Grounds

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 93 al. 1 let. a LTF

The appeal was declared inadmissible because it was directed against a non-appealable decision (interlocutory decision).

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The appellant was ordered to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/1574/2008

### [ATA/313/2008](/apps/decis/fr/ata/show/1882560) du 10.06.2008 ( LCR ) , IRRECEVABLE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/ata/file/2008/0003/ATA_000313_2008_A_1574_2008.pdf)

* /