Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATA/281/2007 • CJ GE ATA/281/2007 Généré par l'IA

Subsequent Remedial Measures as Evidence of Negligence

Numéro de cause ATA/281/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court considered the permissibility of introducing evidence of subsequent remedial measures taken by a party after an event causing injury, which the opposing party sought to use to demonstrate negligence. The court reasoned that the legislative intent behind the rule excluding such evidence is to encourage parties to undertake safety improvements without fear that those improvements will be used against them in litigation as admissions of fault, thereby holding that evidence of subsequent repairs or design changes is generally inadmissible to prove prior negligence, although it may be admissible for other purposes such as proving ownership or control, or feasibility of precautionary measures if genuinely controverted.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Subsequent Remedial Measures as Evidence of Negligence: The court reasoned that the legislative intent behind the rule excluding such evidence is to encourage parties to undertake safety improvements without fear that those improvements will be used against them in litigation as admissions of fault, thereby holding that evidence of subsequent repairs or design changes is generally inadmissible to prove prior negligence, although it may be admissible for other purposes such as proving ownership or control, or feasibility of precautionary measures if genuinely controverted.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
responsabilité pour cas fortuit usage antérieur mesures provisionnelles administration des preuves contrôle obligatoire preuve insuffisante d'aggravation médicale

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Cited for the decision on costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

        

       

 

    









 !" ###### 



$%    &$'((     $ 





     !"# 

 

&(  )*++++++,-&.#/,**012* 322  4* 1*  !& 5* &...(  6*  768 !''9, * 0 1--7:44687041*4*61;-(

  <-#2-7*!''$,0*----*-=412* 3224**-116**661;-(

!(  &!6*!''#,)(++++++-1-1:7*** 1-160-6*->* 1:?-16@ A<7*=8***041*7*4*18*  A*- 0*-1(   41*A- A0* 07* 1 1  1  *0-8*62**B*1*6C'D4 *A( 17*116-16* 022*1*,*1**=3,-*7,0* ,*6607* EF$G'''( (

9(  &'5*!''#,-16-*=)(++++++, 6*2A0*6A*1*:4*61 H( 1, A---*26-A6*61:I1-16 1:&C6*!''#*11**-*1011** *1****(

$(  )( ++++++  -  *  -16  !& 5* !''#  **1-0-**26(2*41** 3B     2*6- A0*  17* 1 7 =  1-  * 0 -8*6 2**   4 *A( 2*, *  6-  -16  17* 0 A* 1 76 6  EF&G'''( (

C(   <-  9' 8 !''#,  -16  2-  -*7 0** 041* **-( 0*-- 07* 1 --  6  6-160681*:-*1*6 A<,6<66167;-5*!''#(

#(   !. 768 !''#, )( ++++++  **  *8 6***2 0 (   13-  -16   1 7* 1*  *-* 0*6118:66-*,661-B4*A( 7* -  *22*- 1 8*  *   *  61*( 2*,*6-=A0-***-1-B 76**-4*A(

/(  %57*!''/,-16011-(

"$$%&"!''# 9"# 

   1*: A* 07* 1 -- 1*   -* 1-7 1  *1** **,  A )(++++++ 7*  6 (  -16  -B6 2- 0  6*:   1*6   4 *A16*-,0*%&*-9:B604-** 7*4*%-68&...> 4*JE&9'('&@16 1(

%(   &! 2-7* !''/,  1*  -- 7A- 1  *  61*1,=A)(++++++2*-2( -1 6,*61-1**(

   7 *   *  &! 6 !''/,    A  6*A0*07*16*-161*: *7*8*(*-*11*82*B*8* *7*-28***72*61;-(

.(   &! 7* !''/,  -16  **A- A  6  0-7 4*A* EFC9G'''( (2**-1*617*1 A6**-66A*()(++++++0;16* -167-022*1*,*0-*11*80-8* 78**-(

&'(   *  &9 7* !''/,    **A- A0* K>1*@ 1666***27*1L(

&&(   !# 7* !''/,  -16 0 11- =  1*   1-(

&!(  HA*,--B-=5B(

 ( 

&(  5-  61 * 7  5*** 61-,    78>(C# *GB**5***!!768&.$&    !'CM(#9(&*(*1-6***7&! 168&.%C    C&'@(

!(  -7*B, 4*8B-*7* 4*!#6&...> 4*@(

  :6,:B604-**7*4* %-68&...> 4*@--8B-1 4*(

9( ( H0*C9*-& 4*,3224*** 12*32261;-322*-161;-

"$$%&"!''# $"# 

0 4*,A*,0-7*B*,46*: 22*7  12*,  7* -*7   12*  322 4*1-717-B**(

 8( H0B*  16*  7* 18*,   16*: - 1: 0-  7*B    4*,  41* 0 4*  16*  *6, **  87 041* 7  & 57* !''$  4I*7*-70*C% 4*,*=8--2**0 16*  7* 18*, 1  A0* 4  6*: 22*7  12*    1 -5=  8--2* 0  16*,  A0* *  61 *-10*!' 4*>(C%(!(8  4*@(  16*  -*7-  1*6 0 4 *A   6 -1     -8  0*7*-,  *1*,   12*>(!&($C%($ 4*@(

   1, 4 6  0* && *- &  4*, 0**  -*7- =  1 13;*A A0   8--2* 0  12*3224*>(@,7*-*716*7* 18* >( 8@, *1 0  12* 2*4     :7=A1<*,661--1318** =A22**->(@,5*2*78**- 22***=*61*>(@11*-*1 *B 0 7-3* -1 4 4*B  * 2--     4*, *66*-=6:7>(@(

$(  H 0* C *- &  4*,  78**- 0 A- * < 46*-807-022*1*2*** 6**(1,0*-#,!:6136<6*1**1-7*A A- * 11  17, * 1  * 0 -8*6 2**, *  -1 0B 1:  -16, A0* *1   66-*11;41-7=0*!&*-$*(

  H0*%&*-& 4*,-1612**-  1*6 1  1*6   4( 0*- 9   *1** 1-*- *1 2* A  2**-  17 1,  64*66, A   6**-  6    4  A0 *7 *61*A  1*6 6-B*161*6*-B-*-11 N6*(

C(   01:, *  -8* A )( ++++++  *1 1   66 -* 1 1;  6**-   4 *A * 0 * 0 -8*6B*1*6(1,6B--*A**7*-- 2*4-,012*7-022*1*,** *61*804678**-(

"$$%&"!''# C"# 

    *,  -** **B* 2  -*7  0****-2-5-(

#(   7   *, 6* 1 * 61   ** 2**: -*,-661I>(%/ @( OOOOO

%' (        

)*+,"-!.

- 78   *5-  !. 768 !''# 1 )* ++++++ -**-16G-6*-9'8!''#M

+,.

5M

*A0*011I0-66M

* A, 26-6 4 * %!  *7   * 2--   *8 2--  &/ 5* !''C > F H &/9(&&'@,  1- < 1 < 1-    5 A* *7  *2** 1 7  *8 2--, 1  7*  6*:*18*M6-6****A*, 6*26;171*B6*M* * < -  *8 2--, &'''  &$, 1 7* 1  1 7* -*A 4 **  G* $!  F(  1- <   1*:  1*  , *7A- 66 6;  17, *7 < 5* = G7*M

66*A  1- < = )* ++++++ ** A0 -16  G-6*-(

"$$%&"!''# #"# 

H*-B? )(;3:,1-*,)67;E*,) 3-*,)6,5B(

6 *86***2?

B22*: 5*?  1-*?     (* H*B* F(;3:   

1*26<--66*A-41*(

 :7,  B22*:?           

"$$%&"!''#