Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATA/229/2007 • CJ GE ATA/229/2007 Généré par l'IA

Contractual Performance and Breach Dispute

Numéro de cause ATA/229/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A dispute arose regarding a contractual obligation involving a specific performance, leading to litigation over whether the claimed performance had been duly tendered or if a material breach had occurred due to an alleged failure in that regard. The court reasoned that the existence and sufficiency of the tender were matters of factual determination, and upon review of the evidence presented by both parties, it found that the claimant failed to establish the required performance, thus affirming the lower court's finding of breach, while also addressing and rejecting various affirmative defenses raised by the breaching party, including arguments related to waiver and cure.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contractual Performance and Breach Dispute: The court reasoned that the existence and sufficiency of the tender were matters of factual determination, and upon review of the evidence presented by both parties, it found that the claimant failed to establish the required performance, thus affirming the lower court's finding of breach, while also addressing and rejecting various affirmative defenses raised by the breaching party, including arguments related to waiver and cure.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
inexécution d'une obligation contractuelle objet du litige exécution en nature offre effective qualification du contrat obligation de prester de l'assureur

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Cited in the final order concerning the distribution of court costs.
Généré par l'IA
A/2303/2003
Contract Breach and Performance Dispute
A/3733/2005
Contract Breach and Specific Performance Dispute
A/1781/2002
Contractual Breach and Performance Dispute
A/277/2005
Contractual Breach and Interpretation of Performance Obligations
A/1098/2006
Contractual Breach and Defective Performance Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Cited in the final order concerning the distribution of court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

        

       

 

    



 ! "#$%









 $%!  &&&&&&          ' ( '' )) '' ' (* ) 





     !"# 

' 

()  *+ ,,,,,,- .+++/ 0 *1+-  ++ 2 3.+  ++3+3+/)

!)  ('4+!&&#0&$5%!-+++6+1+ +++/72+8+2942:6+)+ 0(&(;."576+3+/+#&;."5) 3</+ .=/+/-/3.88+8++>%;."5)

  6+6/8+++6((46+!&&')

>)  *),,,,,,3//96+!%46+!&&'8+6+ 72+6++5?@,,,,,,+++6/5+43 2+0223+)47+-+6+330 /.++/+)216+3A5A7+26+ ++/ 0  3 6+) 3+- + 6+ B  . A/A 7+ + 6+ 6+B-2372+6+9+6/5+36+)

C)   /++  (! 8/6+ !&&'-  6+  .9+    6+=+D+ 3<EF G3/+3.+2/+ .+ 3  .++.. /=- +/ 72+ 2=++ 2 +8+ =6 H <=   ++ +<  2+ (# +/ ( +8//+++<(!/.9($%ID   F'C()&(G)

%)  3/(&.!&&'-*),,,,,,/++ 3< +9.+++8)2H<6+7++/+35/2/+ 36+/32+(# )+6+.+=/+/    2 =)  3- 2   ++ +< .++7?5+/-+.++6+/+8+H/0 I&;."5)2H<6+72+6+..+6+J7(%;."5   >% ;."5) 8+- + +=+ 72+ 26+  //- 7  /++33.+<+8+/+HJ../6<72+6+3+ +8..+)

  4+=+2. KL#%&) 72+6+B0724+ /.. KL#&) +2/+7+/)

#)   3+  //   2 +  .3+ 3!&6+!&&') 3+/H3++)

"$%!"!&&' >"# 

 ) 8+6+72+6+9+3.++3 2+02@,,,,,,0<6.+/=.0+ )

 9) 3/F 3+//++7/-8. .++../=)

')  F7+-//=/04=)

' ) 

()  4/  .3 + 6  4+++ .3/-    69D)%# +M=++4+++!!6.9($C(    !&%N)#>)(+)+3/.+++6(! 3.9($I%    %(&G)

!)  K+/-6+.H+.=//6/5+3+ I&;."5-7++-++6++9++/ 869  M+ C +/ (    M   <=   +++<(>6.9($#!D  F'C()((N L(!( (!'-  ($$%##CG)FM+/%.J.+3++-+=H36 ++7 M 6+ .H+.-  + / 33+9  +  3 +.++=//6+)

  F  4+3  +9 8//  .+< MH<  6+ 0 MH/+M+/-+++7+M35//3/- /3.6+.H+.+/%0!%;."5+  3  =6+/ 7+ 4+8+  +.3 6+.    M+ (# +/ >   D L (!>  (&#-  ($$'  '!%- +) !9- 33) '!I '!$  /8) +)G)   M+8+ 3++<. /=<- +  / 0  . .+++6D)(#)C G)

  7/3.+!#!$;."5-8=6+/ .1D L(!C !%$G+.3+7<= =//+3.+ M+(#9+/!08 NM+/+8+ +3 MH.+  +  M3<- +   36+ +9. + 7M+ M/+ 3  3 0 M+/+ M +/)  H.   + + 7MH3+.  4=  M.+++ 0   +  3.+  + D L (!#  CI +)!3)%(G)

   65-  /3.  >& ;."5  3 O  3++3  + 9+=+  3.+  + 8 .+8 H3+ 36 4+8+ MH<  6+  H  8  M.9++   +

"$%!"!&&' C"# 

9+=+  3.+  +- 6  =6+/   .+  = 7M+ 367)   + -  4+3 +< 7    ..+6++=+<M<=8.D) (#)!)08 N)$&5)!  N L(!> (&#- ($$' '!%- +)!-3)'>(/8)+)N L(!>>'-+)(-33)C& C(-F($$'33) %!' %!IN "'>%"!&&%(6.9!&&%G)

  +3++333+97+++++ 869    7  //   8+8 + 9  .6+)  M=+-  88-   .+<- M  /+/  +   86+73+9M/=+/+.4++9D L(($9 (%#NF($$>3)%>%N L((I($&N(&I9#'N(&C9%(G)

>)  8./. 0 2+ C +/ %  2   <=   ++ +<  (> 6.9 ($#!     F 'C()((G- A7  +=H++726+.H+.- +33+9+ 3+.++=//6+A)

  23<-6+/++++.+/0#&;."53I&;."5) /72H<6+>%;."5)

C)  +H3/-H<6+++8+ =6    2+ (# +/ (     3+72  ++-    3+  +7  .  =  /+/ 2+)  .+  = 9+  88+ D "!%#"!&&#  $ .+ !&&#G) F  + < 3++< 36 + 0 +/ 7  ++ 2=9+/+H23+8+D "'!&"!&&%!%9 !&&%G.++3/+/23<)

%)  7+9+38+/=/3-H +363.8+H.+8/+.++../= 7+9+230JH.+/D L(>!!>C-+)!)>3)!>' 588H+G)

#)  3+.8/-4/)

   /..  KL C&&)   .+ 0  5=   D) I'  G)







"$%!"!&&' %"# 

+  ')  '    

,-.$ /

/69+4/(&.!&&'3*+,,,,,, /++6+.9+6+=+(!8/6+!&&'++ 3.++3/+.+N

.$%/

4N

.05=/.. KLC&&) N

+ 7- 8./. H + I!  +6   + 8//   +9 8//  (' 4+ !&&% D L F ('>)((&G-  3/ J 3 J 3/    4 7+ +6  +8++ 3 6  +9 8//- 3  6+  .+<+39+N./.++++7+- .+8.1363+=.+N+ + J /  +9 8//- (&&&  (C- 3 6+ 3  3 6+ /+7 H ++  M+ C!  L)  3/ J   3+<  3+  - +67/ .. .1  36- +6 J 4+ 0 M6+N

..+73/J0*+,,,,,,-6+.9+ 6+=+++720M88+8//0)

F+/=E *)15<-3/+-*.K+-4=)

. +9.+++8E

=88+< 4+E  3/+E     )+ F+=+ L)15<   



"$%!"!&&' #"# 

3+8.J//..+7/H3+)

 <6-  =88+<E           

"$%!"!&&'