Federal Tribunal Upholds Denial of Benefits for Non-Accidental Meniscus Injury
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe claimant, whose meniscus injury did not result from an accident, was denied social insurance benefits, leading to a Federal Tribunal appeal. The court rejected the appeal, upholding the denial because the injury did not meet the legal definition of an accident as required under the relevant social insurance legislation.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAFederal Tribunal Upholds Denial of Benefits for Non-Accidental Meniscus Injury: The court rejected the appeal, upholding the denial because the injury did not meet the legal definition of an accident as required under the relevant social insurance legislation.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IATexte complet
A/420/1995
### [ATA/22/1996](/apps/decis/fr/ata/show/1870795) du 23.01.1996 ( ASSU ) , REJETE Recours TF déposé le 29.02.1996, rendu le 28.11.1996, REJETE, U 63/96 Descripteurs :
ASSURANCE SOCIALE; ACCIDENT; AA; NOTION; ASSU
Normes :
OLAA.9 al.1
Parties :
BROENNIMANN Martin-Paul / WINTERTHUR ASSURANCES
Résumé : Lésion méniscale ne résultant pas d'un accident. Prestations refusées.
Pas de document HTML