Claimant Injury Compensation Incidental to Employment
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe reviewing body considered whether a claimant was entitled to compensation after being injured while performing duties outside their explicitly defined employment contract, specifically while engaging in an activity that was customary for their role and known to the employer. The court reasoned that the activity was sufficiently incidental to the claimant's employment duties, given the established practice and the employer's awareness, to fall within the scope of employment, thereby justifying the award of compensation for the resulting injury.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 66 al. 1 LTF; Claimant Injury Compensation Incidental to Employment: The court reasoned that the activity was sufficiently incidental to the claimant's employment duties, given the established practice and the employer's awareness, to fall within the scope of employment, thereby justifying the award of compensation for the resulting injury.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThis provision was cited in the dispositive concerning the allocation of court costs.
Texte complet
!
"#$$#%""&#'" $
( ) *(
+ , +) + ( #% *
!"#
&'()*!%%$+&,-(&& && *&,&.& +,/* *&&0!1'-&!%%$(&-23*(+&, - 45((+*4&(&647&4-&* .& +,/(+*01'&!%%1&*&8#%9*":-&-(:&68 &4&+(6+(&*,4+ -&;
- & & ,- 8 4& (&& &&7&-&&(+*3&<4&+-5(= *<>-&&>6?-&-(:& &&*&(8!%9*":;
- & (+*6 !1 * !%%$6 &7( + & ,-6 * 8 < 433 +&3 &( & &( 8 < +(&+6-+++&;
-6 +&* 3&6 3*&( & +&&+ ++& &(6-&82&*+&&&-<(&(;
&@33+&3;
-#!$ %/
+ +& +(6 & )A )B & +(*&&&-C!+*2CBA$. $C%0;
& < @&& +& + (& (& +& + &&7;
& < @&( + 3& @33& @&& @2 (& +&6 8 @(:( @ ( 8 *+ ' ? (&& +D+&&<(=+&;
(-3&+('<48&'7(3;
&< +( (&&6 +&6 8 & ,-6 && <@8 * *&& *&, & (+* 4&(&647&4-&*E
"$#%"!%%$ #"#
+(& &2*&&&3/ FEG:,
+&3*(&&((&<(=+&E
,-6 733&,/
"$#%"!%%$